Is she on the Board of the Dalton School or not? Anyone know? Asking the school proved fruitless. Anyone? Anyone?

Dominatrix with greasy hair?

This is such a train wreck.

Bueller? Bueller?!

I've really had enough of this bullshit. The judge needs to sanction Charney for the despicable way in which he's handled his frivolous lawsuit.

Why the excess vitriol suddenly becasue Alexandra Korry is up here on the Board? I don't get it. Why the obcesity NOW?

Poor woman, my ass. She must pull down $3 million a year or more. She probably has an office bigger than my condo with a view of the Hudson River. I don't think she gives a damn about what is said on here anyway. Poor woman, oh yeah, I feel real sorry for her. Huh.

I think Korry or someeone in her family must be posting on here b/c let's face it, who else would have such violent reactions? I mean, I think she looks kind of homely and all that but she shouldn't be attacked. Still - I would not go all mental in her defense like we are seeing in some of these posts.

I'm sure all that was handed to her. She didn't have to work hard for it. I guarantee you she put up with 50x more harassment than Charney ever did.

The point is YOU'RE HARASSING HER WORST THAN CHARNEY WAS EVER HARASSED. AND YOU'RE DOING IT PUBLICLY. DO YOU KNOW WHAT A HYPOCRITE IS?

I've never seen a more vindictive and frivolous lawsuit in my life.

Korry doesn't have time to look at this board, she's out at her usual 3 martini lunch at Le Cirque or something. I, on the other hand, with my idiotic, unemployed clients on contingency who sit on their beat-up couches all day drinking Colt 40 and call me about six times before noon to ask when their settlement check is coming, have plenty of time while I contemplate why I ever went to law school and post to these boards.

To be clear - This is a private person. Unlike Charney she didn't seek the public spotlight. Charney's frivolous lawsuit and vindictive marketing thrust her into the public spotlight.

Her dad was a US Ambassador. poor poor gal. She clwed her way up from the gutter, huh?

Whatever. She sure is loathed at S&C though. It's all sad

This board is closed to all family members and relatives of Korry.

I 2nd that motion made by poster @12:55!

Huh?

May be Krautheimer (BA SUNY-Binghampton, JD Western New England) had Ivy Envy, and Charney was a good target.

Do you need a 140 LSAT to get into WNE Law?

And let the Krautheimer harassment begin. He didn't go to Harvard. He's ugly.

What would John Foster Dulles said about this law suit?

Now let's make fun of John Foster Dulles. mmmm... I don't like the airport they named after him? LOL

I'm a gay lawyer and a fair person. The couple posts with the anti-gay slurs seriously bum me out and I feel a little sad after reading them.

This dispute is between a guy named Aaron and a law firm. Leave gays out of this. "Gays" as a whole are neither the named plaintiff, nor a named defendant, but I note that at least one gay partner is portrayed as an enabler of the discrimination. So, with a gay on both sides of the complaint, I don't see how you can read it and slur "gays."

I sympathize with everyone involved in the complaint. I understand gay readers of the complaint who are hurt and want to lash out at the named wrongdoers, and I understand those who doubt the complaint and feel revulsion toward Charney. But I don't understand the posts that this single complaint justifies being anti-gay.

You can tell just by looking at her that she is a total bitch.

Does anyone have Reichen's phone number? He's a real pretty gay.

What about the other associate -- Gera G.

How does this law suit affect him?

Inquiring Mind

Does Korry have PMS 24-7, 365?

What's the deal.

Give specifics of her antics!

this has become an exercise in cruelty. does anyone posting here realize that we are talking about real people with lifetimes spent building careers -- with information based on the venting of a few associates and the unsubstantiated claims of a single person?

"Does Korry have PMS 24-7, 365?" That's not sexist.

Hypocrites. Absolute vindictive, libelous, asshole hypocrites.

In summary. People like Charney are why respectable homosexuals can't come out. I'm just sick of it.

Sometimes when you career is built on destroying others careers, family life, etc. it comes back to bite you in the ass.

To 2:11, now you are blaming Charney for why gays can't come out? Do you realize that it is actually okay to discriminate against gays in the workplace in most states. Charney, fortunately, works in NYC, which actually protects the rights of gay employees. If Charney were alleging harrassment because he was black, would you be saying the same thing?

It sounds like you are self-loating and have your own issues. Deal with them. But if anything, Charney's actions at least have the appearance of trying to help people to come out at the office.

And if you happen to be the same "Anon" who posted at 12:38, I just feel sorry for you. I hope you are not this vitriolic in public, otherwise, you must be a very sad and lonely person. And don't blame your hatred of gay people on this one law suit. It's clear that you are just a bigot waiting for an opportunity to shoot your mouth off. What you don't realize is that the hatred in your posts make your underlying opinions lack any credibility whatsoever.

Please. We have the most vanity of any sociological group out there.

anon 2:41 - you are an asian female then, right?

BTW I'm not out and I have a lot of issues with mainstream gay culture. I'm sure there are many more gay people like me. Not everyone is flaming.

You do realize there is a whole world of difference between "out" and "flaming." I think you are one of the issues that is plaguing gay culture. You're attitude towards homosexuality (i.e., that it is something of which to be ashamed) gives people the idea that it is okay to demean, discriminate, harrass, beat up (I could go on and on, but I hope you get the point).

Oh, and I'm also kind of ugly and went to a crappy law school. That's why I got so prickly when you all made fun of Eric Krautheimer.

Here's the diff. bet. making fun of Eric Krautheimer vs. Aaron Charney. If you're a pole smoker, can't do much about that. "Therapy" for gays has a v. low success rate.

But if you're (a) fat, bald, and ugly, and (b) a Sullivan & Cromwell partner, there ARE things you can do. You make millions of $$$ a year. So liposuction, a personal trainer, diet delivery meals, hair replacement surgery, and cosmetic surgery are all things you can afford.

So wrong dude. Just the other day I was walking down Santa Monica Blvd. when a stranger flat out tried to pick me up on the street, in open daylight. He gushed like I was Tom Cruise - who I've been told I look like. It was embarassing.

Look. I'm interested in gay issues. Why else would I have spent about three hours a day the last three days on this board? But you need to admit that Charney's case heavily leans towards being bullshit and hurts the community. The heros at S&C are the 10 or so homosexuals who worked hard and made partner, and the gay associates who couldn't make it, but didn't blame it on their homosexuality.

David Lat asked us to comment on Korry. So we did.

This is no worse than what gets said about Korry behind her back. If I were her, I'd rather know what people are saying, so I can deal with it pro-actively.

How are things at S&C?

I wonder if ANY work is getting done over there. I bet people are just sitting around and gossiping all day.

Of course no work is getting done. We're too busy concocting conspiracy theories about why certain highly-detailed comments to the WSJ law blog were pulled...(these posts were fairly specific in their criticisms of S&C and, in particular certain partners/wannabe underlings...

4:44

What are some of the conpiracy theories you have come up with thus far?

Please say that these comments can be recreated for those of us whose free time allows for the constant refreshing of only one legal gossip blog.

4:44 PM: We have an email into Peter Lattman about this. Also, please note that ATL has a general "no moderation" policy with respect to comments. So if the WSJ Law Blog posters would like to reproduce their comments here, they are welcome to do so.

(An exception to our "no moderation" policy: We pull comments that appear to be accidental duplicates -- e.g., double- or triple-posted comments.)