Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: Let's Make Our Own Skadden Memo!

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGHere's what the associate pay raise memo for Skadden's Class of 2003 looked like:

From: Garfinkel, Jodie
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 12:26 PM
To: [redacted]
Subject: Compensation

TO: Class of 2003

We are pleased to advise you that we are increasing base salaries retroactive to January 1, 2007. The salary for most associates in the class of 2003 will be increased from $190,000 to $210,000. Increases will be reflected in paychecks of February 15th and retroactive payments will be made only to those attorneys who are employed with the Firm on February 15th.

Annual bonuses will be determined at year end based upon individual performance, levels of activity in the Firm's practice areas and the economic environment as it affects our Firm.

We thank you for your continued commitment and dedication.

SASM&F

********************************

If you're a Skadden associate in a class other than 2003, please provide your new base salary in the comments. We will "Wiki" our way towards a comprehensive Skadden memo. Thanks everyone!

Earlier: Previous announcements of law firm associate salary increases (scroll down through "Skaddenfreude" archives)

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by What? | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:34 PM

What on earth does "most associates" mean? Are they making this discretionary? I haven't seen that in any other increase memo...

avatar
2 Posted by Received from a Skadden Associate | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:36 PM

O: Class of 2005

We are pleased to advise you that we are increasing base salaries retroactive to January 1, 2007. The salary for
most associates in the class of 2005 will be increased from $155,000 to
$170,000. Increases will be reflected in paychecks of February 15th and
retroactive payments will be made only to those attorneys who are employed
with the Firm on February 15th.

Annual bonuses will be determined at year end based upon individual performance, levels of activity in the Firm's practice areas and the economic environment as it affects our Firm.

We thank you for your continued commitment and
dedication.

SASM&F

avatar
3 Posted by The Dude | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:37 PM

"Most associates" probably refers those who didn't make billables in one or more of the previous years and thus didn't get the full raise? Just guessing.

avatar
4 Posted by Received from a Skadden Associate | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:37 PM

O: Class of 2005

We are pleased to advise you that we are increasing base salaries retroactive to January 1, 2007. The salary for
most associates in the class of 2005 will be increased from $155,000 to
$170,000. Increases will be reflected in paychecks of February 15th and
retroactive payments will be made only to those attorneys who are employed
with the Firm on February 15th.

Annual bonuses will be determined at year end based upon individual performance, levels of activity in the Firm's practice areas and the economic environment as it affects our Firm.

We thank you for your continued commitment and
dedication.

SASM&F

avatar
5 Posted by What? | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:41 PM

The Dude: most firms just don't give those people a bonus I thought? At my firm you don't get a bonus if you don't make your hours, but you ALWAYS get the standard class year raise.

avatar
6 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:53 PM

What?:

My firm doesnt give a bonus if you dont hit 2000, but you dont advance a class year if you dont hit some lesser number (maybe 1700?).

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:58 PM

"most associates" means the rest will be shown the door?

Also I really hope that someone does a reply-to-all on that e-mail.

avatar
8 Posted by blark | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:58 PM

"Most associates" is probably a reference to part-time associates. I highly doubt Skadden is signaling anything. You people are pret-ty excitable.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 7:59 PM

Also, what is the summer associate salary status?

Anyone other than STB announce?

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:00 PM

Is the raise for all offices? Do all skadden offices also get the same bonuses?

avatar
11 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:07 PM

David: How about redacting the names of the Skadden associates while keeping the essential info? I'm sure some of those people would not appreciate having their salary AND their name (in the same document) broadcast to the world. Let your clever readers deduce who is making what, if they really want to know.

avatar
12 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:10 PM

I'm sure Richard J Zuromski Jr. wants everyone to know that, even though he went to Loyola Law School, he made it.

avatar
13 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:14 PM

"most" is probably used because some of the 2003 associates make more than their peers due to an advanced degree or the like.

avatar
14 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:22 PM

Anon at 8:14: I don't think firms make those distinctions. I think if anything they just make you a higher class year. Anyone at a firm that actually pays different salaries to full time associates of the same year? Just curious.

avatar
15 Posted by futureSKADDEN detective | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:22 PM

From the memo posted with names, I went to Skadden's website. There are associates from every office on that list. Thus, the raise is for all offices.

"most" has no underlying meaning - no one would get paid less than this amount.

avatar
16 Posted by Skadden Insider | Permalink Wednesday, January 24, 2007 8:30 PM

Class of 1999 on up moved from $250,000 to $280,000. As always, Skadden has no matched at the senior levels.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:39 AM

class of 2006 got a memo raising to $160,000

avatar
18 Posted by Lexi | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:54 AM

I'm just glad to see my old boyfriend from the Fernald School in Waltham is doing so well!

avatar
19 Posted by Lexi | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 9:58 AM

I'm just glad to see my ex-boyfriend from Fernald is doing so well!

avatar
20 Posted by Clay | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:25 AM

I am just a simple landscaper from the midwest but these salaries seem sinful.

avatar
21 Posted by Yards | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:59 AM

Clay, I too used be a landscaper (and it was fun). But then I decided to go to college and law school (both also fun). Now I herd sheep, but my classmates who work all the time deserve a lot of money. It's not sinful, it's fun!

avatar
22 Posted by Shoot Me Now | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:15 AM

OK, I am a SASMF '03 and I have no email. I also have no idear why.

avatar
23 Posted by Iwantanon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:41 AM

Better call Jodie Garfinkle

avatar
24 Posted by Shoot Me Now | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:51 AM

Never mind. Silly me. My outlook has been down since Wednesday morning. Glad the gun wasn't loaded.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:53 AM

Ok, why do we care about Shanetta Cutlar right now? Eyes on the prize David Lat.

avatar
26 Posted by Iloveskadslave | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:44 PM

"most" means some will get more, some will get less, most will get the same. now, that's an idear.

avatar
27 Posted by I love CB | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:55 PM

I think "most" means all but those who work less than 3000 hours a year. Slackers!

avatar
28 Posted by clay | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:07 PM

Given the sinfulness of these salaries, would anyone be willing to donate anything to my community's house of worship, Cedarville Baptist Church? We've needed a new roof for years, and it really is the center of our community. Thanks in advance for your kind responses.

avatar
29 Posted by Happy with 145 | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:15 PM

Anonymous 11:53: Why do you care so much about money?

avatar
30 Posted by Happy with 145 | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:21 PM

Anonymous 11:53: Why do you care so much about money?

avatar
31 Posted by Richard Z | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:47 PM

Hey there "anonymous." Thanks for compounding the issue by using my name in your post. If you are going to make your comments personal, at least get some balls and use your name.

avatar
32 Posted by Richard Z | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:54 PM

Hey there "anonymous." Thanks for posting my name a second time - I really do appreciate it. But if you are going to make these posts a personal attack, why not get some balls and use your real name.

avatar
33 Posted by Richard Z | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:57 PM

Hey there "anonymous." Thanks for posting my name a second time - I really do appreciate it. But if you are going to make these posts a personal attack, why not get some balls and use your real name.

avatar
34 Posted by Richard Z | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:58 PM

Hey there "anonymous." Thanks for posting my name a second time - I really do appreciate it. But if you are going to make these posts a personal attack, why not get some balls and use your real name.

avatar
35 Posted by Joe Blogs | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 10:10 AM

I think you should remove the names of the people in the email.

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 10:16 AM

I doubt Lat will do that. Names and other proper nouns generate Google and other search engine traffic.

Anyway, why? These people are all on the Skadden website. This is all public information, available to anyone with an internet connection.

avatar
37 Posted by anon | Permalink Sunday, January 28, 2007 7:20 PM

any word on if the raise will apply to summers as well?

avatar
38 Posted by iu | Permalink Sunday, January 28, 2007 7:49 PM

of course it will apply to summers

avatar
39 Posted by futurelawclerk | Permalink Monday, January 29, 2007 8:47 PM

Here's a thought: when I started law school - starting salary in NY was 125K. Now the starting salary is 160K and it's a change that reflects the market value of recent graduates. However, the bonus given to people who clerk has remained at 15K. Every year law firms raise their salaries only increases the amount of money students give up in order to clerk. That amount is now more than 110K. True that clerks benefit from the prestige of clerkships on the resume, but most have just as many loans to pay and I refuse to believe the value of an associate has appreciated but the value of a law clerk has not. If law firms want to attract clerks, it's about time that they raise the clerkship bonus to reflect the change in market.

avatar
40 Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, January 29, 2007 9:10 PM

futurelawclerk: what are you going to do if clerkship bonuses don't increase? i bet you'll still end up at a firm. base salaries in new york went up because of pressure from the non-legal market. but i-banks don't really care if you clerked.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, January 29, 2007 9:37 PM

futurelawclerk:

I'm not sure what level of clerkship you are talking about, but I know some firms will now give between $30,000 - 40,000 for circuit court clerks. In fact, almost every firm I have researched is giving at least $20,000 for a circuit court clerk.

avatar
42 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, February 1, 2007 11:10 AM

regarding the "most associates" language, I believe it is the equivalent of the language in other firms' memos indicating that associates "in good standing" will receive the increase (ex. see Milbank memo). Those associates who are not "in good standing" were likely put on notice of that fact and know who they are.

Post Your Comment