Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: White & Case Weighs In

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGCongratulations to Emily Pataki. It appears that her employer, White & Case, is raising base salaries for its associates. Here's the memo:

WHITE & CASE LLP

Date: January 25, 2007
To: All New York Associates
From: David N. Koschik
Re: Salary Increases

I am pleased to announce that effective January 1, 2007 the base salaries for New York associates in the following classes will be increased as follows:

Class / 2007 Base Salary
2006 $160,000
2005 $170,000
2004 $185,000
2003 $210,000
2002 $230,000
2001 $250,000
2000 $265,000
1999 $280,000

Increases for associates in the class of 1998 and senior will be determined on an individual basis. All increases, including the retroactive portion to the beginning of the year, will be reflected in your February 14 paycheck. On behalf of the Firm, I would like to personally thank you for all of your dedication and hard work.

cc: New York Partners

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:42 AM

How about Debevoise? Any word?

avatar
2 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:45 AM

whats with DC getting shafted here?

avatar
3 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:45 AM

also should post Hogan & Hartson. No memo, but reported by law.com as mentioned in another comment

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:45 AM

Continuing the only-NY trend...Not good, not good.

I think it's time that DC & LA associates start complaining to their partners...

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:49 AM

I am sure the W&C associates in DC love the fact that they are making $25,000 less than their NY counterparts.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:51 AM

what makes you think DC and LA associates deserve the NY-level pay?

avatar
7 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:52 AM

What's the word on Hogan?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:52 AM

And what did DC get?

DC got hosed!

avatar
9 Posted by stuart | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:53 AM

W&C DC is at 145, not 135. That said, DC should march to 160. It's about recruitment.

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:56 AM

maybe the DC assocs got a separate memo...hopefully thats the case.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:57 AM

W&C DC also doesn't give bonuses, so if one assumes the 30K bonus is here to stay, first-year DC Skaddenites get total comp of $190, while W&C 1Ls are pulling down $145 total. That's a slap in the face!

avatar
12 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:57 AM

"what makes you think DC and LA associates deserve the NY-level pay?"

I assure you, at 11 last night (after at least two weeks, including weekends, of 11 every night), DC associates begin to get odd thoughts in their heads about billing that many hours and paying several thousand dollars a month for 600 square feet, not including parking.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:58 AM

10:51

I don't think they necessarily deserve the exact same thing as NY, but give me a break. Just two years ago, all firms were at $125,000 and market differences were made through bonuses (NY associates have always gotten bigger bonuses).

Are you trying to tell me that the same Ivy League first year associate in DC or LA isn't close to the same value as the same person in NY?

A $10K or $15K difference is one thing, but when the disparity becomes so large that it's $25,000 and up, DC is going to start losing associates to NY.

avatar
14 Posted by David Lat | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:58 AM

Hogan & Hartson is raising in NY but not in DC (yet). The info appears in this article:

http://www.law.com/jsp/dc/PubArticleDC.jsp?id=1169632952916&hub=TopStories

(I'm trying to post it on the main page, but our technical difficulties have returned...)

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:02 AM

I just finished Jack Welsh's book. One of his "winning" answers is to advertize on ATL the same month as an S&C harassment scandal, and NY law firm raises.

Smart guy, apparently...

avatar
16 Posted by Angry Associate | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:04 AM

So let me get this straight b/c I still can't believe my firm hasn't matched yet (crossing fingers).H&H, W&C, and Morgan, Lewis have all matched today? H&H and MLB memos are forthcoming I take it? Debevoise, Cravath, CC, helloooo??

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:06 AM

Every firm in DC (that isn't a NY outpost) is waiting for someone else to make a move. Who will it be? A Chicagoan like Kirkland? A westcoaster like Latham? C'mon, bust this shit open!

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:08 AM

LeBoeuf?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:12 AM

Williams and Connolly matched.

avatar
20 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:12 AM

Any chance a firm like DPW or CSM will come over the top to 170k?

avatar
21 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:13 AM

I wonder about LeBoeuf, too

avatar
22 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:14 AM

I wonder about LeBoeuf, too

avatar
23 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:15 AM

Miami W&C associates make a measly 125K, that's 35k less than NY. Have you SEEN real estate prices in Miami lately? That's why I'm going to Weil in Miami.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:16 AM

Williams & Connolly matched in DC? Or, are they being confused for White & Case, which matched in NY (both W&C)?

avatar
25 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:19 AM

Miami W&C associates make a measly 125K, that's 35k less than NY. Have you SEEN real estate prices in Miami lately? That's why I'm going to Weil in Miami.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:31 AM

No, DC's own Williams & Connolly.

avatar
27 Posted by Sheesh | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:36 AM

Seriously, what's with looking down your noses at associates in DC and Cali, these are your same ivy league classmates here..it's about recruiting. when I started law school it was 125K across the board, had I known this would happen I might have interviewed more with NY offices of the firms that I had callbacks at and maybe gotten YOUR job.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:37 AM

True. Why would anyone in Miami choose White & Case or Greenberg when salaries at Weil are tens of thousands of dollars higher? Weil is going to get flooded with resumes from associates wanting to jump ship.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:40 AM

True. Why would anyone in Miami choose White & Case or Greenberg when salaries at Weil are tens of thousands of dollars higher? Weil is going to get flooded with resumes from associates wanting to jump ship.

avatar
30 Posted by Memo for Williams DC? | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:42 AM

Did Williams and Connelly actually raise DC associates to 160 starting? If so, how did you find out? Any memo or numbers to post?

Thanks!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:45 AM

Also, isn't Williams and Connolly generally above DC market because they don't do bonuses?

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:47 AM

Also, isn't Williams and Connolly generally above DC market because they don't do bonuses?

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:12 PM

let's here more about this Williams and Connolly raise. That would be the first DC-based firm to make the move so far, right?

avatar
34 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:15 PM

I think it's possible people are confusing Williams & Connolly (W&C) with White & Case (W&C). What time did the W&C memo go out?

avatar
35 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:17 PM

Sorry confused myself there a bit...I think it's possible people are confusing Williams & Connolly (W&C) with White & Case (W&C). What time did the official White & Case memo go out?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:18 PM

If Williams & Connolly (DC) actually raised, can someone please send Lat the memo?

avatar
37 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:20 PM

Lat, can we have an open thread to get comments more centralized?

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:28 PM

I'm not confusing White and Case and Williams and Connolly. Every Williams and Connolly associate received a voice mail this morning informing them of the increases. As far as I know, there has not been and will not be a memo.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:29 PM

"W&C DC also doesn't give bonuses, so if one assumes the 30K bonus is here to stay, first-year DC Skaddenites get total comp of $190, while W&C 1Ls are pulling down $145 total. That's a slap in the face! "

Bull S**t, White & Case DC associates get bonuses!!!

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:31 PM

Can we get corroboration from a Williams and Connolly associate that they have indeed gone to 160k?

avatar
41 Posted by uvalaw | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:32 PM

any news on orrick or akin gump? help a law student (future 2007 summer associate) out.

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:33 PM

12:29: that comment that you quote was referring to Williams and Connolly. They don't give bonuses.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:33 PM

"W&C DC also doesn't give bonuses, so if one assumes the 30K bonus is here to stay, first-year DC Skaddenites get total comp of $190, while W&C 1Ls are pulling down $145 total. That's a slap in the face!"


I believe that was about Williams, not White and Case.

avatar
44 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:47 PM

any word on Gibson?

avatar
45 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:53 PM

Umm, Akin Gump is not competitive with Orrick. As a future summer associate you should not be deciding between the two.

avatar
46 Posted by Jimmy Wayne | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:58 PM

anyone else wondering where Cravath is?

avatar
47 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:00 PM

anybody got any info on Bingham McCutchen?

avatar
48 Posted by ahiringpartner | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:01 PM

well, it is certainly reassuring see that the first year associates, working so hard on the job from 7am-11pm, are still able to balance life by commenting on a blog during working hours...

maybe I will walk down the hall and see what my first years are doing on their computers right now...

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:05 PM

Cravath needs to come out at 170. The truly "top" firms need to distance themselves from the pack, as it seems even the Legal Aid Society in NYC will be able to match 160.

avatar
50 Posted by afirstyearassociate | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:06 PM

we're obsessively refreshing this blog to see if you're going to make our hours worth it or whether we need to start planning our exit strategies, ya cheapskate.

avatar
51 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:07 PM

NY DA's office just went to 160.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:09 PM

Clifford Chance matched

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:10 PM

Clifford Chance matched

avatar
54 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:13 PM

i meant bingham in boston

avatar
55 Posted by Ananymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:13 PM

any word on Ropes or Gibson?

avatar
56 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:14 PM

Anyone know anything about Boston?

avatar
57 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:15 PM

i meant bingham in boston

avatar
58 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:16 PM

i meant bingham in boston

avatar
59 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:17 PM

Anyone know anything about Boston?

avatar
60 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:18 PM

Anyone know anything about Boston?

avatar
61 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:18 PM

Does this raise apply in general across the board to summers or does it depend on each firm (mainly Weil)

avatar
62 Posted by ay oh | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:21 PM

any word on king and spalding, nyc?

avatar
63 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:23 PM

Does this apply to summers across the board or does it depend on each firm (wondering about Weil)?

avatar
64 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:24 PM

"Umm, Akin Gump is not competitive with Orrick. As a future summer associate you should not be deciding between the two."

Not sure what you're trying to say here, but Akin has not matched yet but partners have discussed it and word is it's in the works.

avatar
65 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:24 PM

"Umm, Akin Gump is not competitive with Orrick. As a future summer associate you should not be deciding between the two."

Not sure what you're trying to say here, but Akin has not matched yet but partners have discussed it and word is it's in the works.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:27 PM

law students are so friggin stupid.

yes, the raises will all apply to the summer classes as well.

avatar
67 Posted by Bill | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:27 PM

Chances are if you have not heard about firm x or firm y, then there IS NO WORD about firm x or firm y. Stop asking us for information and start getting us some.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM

Anonymous at 1:27:

Ha! I agree.

avatar
69 Posted by qwerty | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:30 PM

anon 1:24: do you work at Akin? What is your source?

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:34 PM

law students are so friggin stupid.

yes, the raises will all apply to the summer classes as well.

avatar
71 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:34 PM

Has anyone heard anything about the mighty Wachtell?

avatar
72 Posted by harvard rocks! | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:38 PM

has any one heard about 1-800-LAWYERS? Did they go to $160k? trying to make my summer decision...

avatar
73 Posted by 1-800-JM-Lawyer | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:42 PM

JACOBY & MEYERS MATCHED!!!!!!!

avatar
74 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:42 PM

what about kirkland.... shouldnt they have to raise their chicago salary at least to 145k

avatar
75 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:47 PM

"anon 1:24: do you work at Akin? What is your source?

Yes, I work here.

avatar
76 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:47 PM

what about kirkland.... shouldnt they have to raise their chicago salary at least to 145k

avatar
77 Posted by 1-800-JM-Lawyer | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:56 PM

JACOBY & MEYERS MATCHED!!!!!!!

avatar
78 Posted by 1800JMLawyer | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:57 PM

JACOBY & MEYERS MATCHED!!!!!!!

avatar
79 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:11 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
80 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:19 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
81 Posted by TickedoffAssociate | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:20 PM

When the F is L&W going to match this $160 level? This is ticking me off.

avatar
82 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:21 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
83 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:24 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
84 Posted by only 160? | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:40 PM

I'm going to be a summer associate and I want more than 160. Base should be at least 200 in NY. Obviously only one firm has to raise and the rest will (eventually) follow. Maybe that's what Wachtell is going to do. Wouldn't that be nice.

avatar
85 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:41 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:44 PM

Sidley Austin?

avatar
87 Posted by waiting | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:50 PM

Any word on Chicago-based firms?

avatar
88 Posted by waiting | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:54 PM

any word on chicago-based firms, like mayer, brown or katten?

avatar
89 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:56 PM

I would love to see one memo honestly say ' we would have been happy to pay you the same or less as we did last year but since it seems like we are painted into a corner with everyone else raising or about to raise salaries, we have no choice for purposes of prestige, recrutiing and retention but to do the same, goddamn STB. you better be f*!$g grateful because we didnt get treated like this when we were associates...oh, yah, and thanks for the hard work, better be even harder now"

avatar
90 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:56 PM

I would love to see one memo honestly say ' we would have been happy to pay you the same or less as we did last year but since it seems like we are painted into a corner with everyone else raising or about to raise salaries, we have no choice for purposes of prestige, recrutiing and retention but to do the same, goddamn STB. you better be f*!$g grateful because we didnt get treated like this when we were associates...oh, yah, and thanks for the hard work, better be even harder now"

avatar
91 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:20 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
92 Posted by annonymous | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:02 PM

We have heard a lot about associate raises. Does anyone have any info on special counsel compensation?

avatar
93 Posted by S&C? 310k? | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:26 PM

Could someone from Sullivan fill all of us in on what their new payscale is? What's up with the 310k for 1998? Does that mean a higher payscale for other mid-level and senior associates as well?

avatar
94 Posted by unknown | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:46 PM

what about Latham, & Watkins, Baker & McKenzie, and California firms, like Orrick?

avatar
95 Posted by unknown | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:50 PM

what about Latham, & Watkins, Baker & McKenzie, and California firms, like Orrick?

avatar
96 Posted by yeh | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:13 PM

Does anyone know how the new associate raises affect special counsel compensation?

avatar
97 Posted by yeh | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:41 PM

What about Proskauer and Chadbourne?

avatar
98 Posted by go blue | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:44 PM

Prior to this recent wave of increases, many of the higher end mid-size 'boutique' firms were on the following pay schedule:

Class / 2007 Base Salary
2006 $135,000
2005 $145,000
2004 $155,000
2003 $170,000
2002 $185,000
2001 $210,000
2000 and earlier are out of lock-step

The way such mid-size boutiques have been responding is by increasing by $10k for classes of 2006, 2005 and 2004 and by $15k for classes of 2003, 2002 and 2001 each time the big firms have bumped up over the past year or so.

avatar
99 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 6:53 PM

Law Offices of Larry H. Parker just matched!!

avatar
100 Posted by n'daloop | Permalink Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:12 PM

Hogan DC

2006 -145
2005 -155
2004 -170
2003 -190
2002 -210
2001 -225
2000 -240
99 and up -250

avatar
101 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, January 26, 2007 9:59 AM

White & Case DC was making $135 and NOT the $145 that one of the posters suggested. I suspect that they'll go to $150 after a whining and kvetching period.

Post Your Comment