Skaddenfreude: A Few Announcements, End of Day Open Thread
Today was a little more interesting than yesterday. A few announcements were made -- or were finally brought to our attention and confirmed, if they were made previously.
After the jump, more information about DLA Piper, Katten Muchin Rosenman, King & Spalding, and Jones Day (Atlanta).
(And, of course, your comments.)
DLA PIPER
From: Conner, Beth
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 10:20 AM
Subject: Message from Frank, Lee, Jeff and Terry re: 2007 Associate Compensation
DLA Piper's financial performance directly reflects the success of our firm's commitment to superior client service, and we deeply appreciate the contributions of our associates to this mission. Our associate compensation system is designed to express our appreciation for these contributions in a tangible way, and we reaffirm our determination to provide base salaries that reflect prevailing salary levels in each of our markets.
To that end, we are pleased to announce a salary increase to $145,000 for new attorneys joining the firm in the following markets: Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, DC, Los Angeles, Northern Virginia, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle, and Silicon Valley. In New York, the starting salary for new attorneys will increase to $160,000.
In each of these markets, similar lock-step increases will be applied for other class years. Please refer to the attached grid for more details.
As communicated in past years, those who meet our admittedly high performance expectations should be confident of receiving the base salary increase that has been set for their practice and market. You will each receive an individual communication by Monday, February 12 confirming your salary. Increases will be retroactive to January 1 and included in paychecks dated February 16.
We look forward to even greater success this year. Thanks again for all you do for the firm and, most of all, for the outstanding service you provide our clients.
Frank, Lee, Jeff and Terry
Atlanta 2007 Los Angeles 2007 San Diego 2007
2006 125,000 2006 145,000 2006 145,000
2005 130,000 2005 155,000 2005 155,000
2004 135,000 2004 170,000 2004 170,000
2003 140,000 2003 190,000 2003 190,000
2002 150,000 2002 210,000 2002 210,000
2001 160,000 2001 230,000 2001 230,000
2000 170,000 2000 245,000 2000 245,000
1999 180,000 1999 245,000 1999 245,000
1998 190,000 1998 245,000 1998 245,000
Austin 2007 New York 2007 San Francisco 2007
2006 145,000 2006 160,000 2006 145,000
2005 155,000 2005 170,000 2005 155,000
2004 170,000 2004 185,000 2004 170,000
2003 190,000 2003 210,000 2003 190,000
2002 210,000 2002 230,000 2002 210,000
2001 230,000 2001 250,000 2001 230,000
2000 245,000 2000 265,000 2000 245,000
1999 245,000 1999 280,000 1999 245,000
1998 245,000 1998 280,000 1998 245,000
Baltimore 2007 Northern VA 2007 Seattle 2007
2006 145,000 2006 145,000 2006 145,000
2005 155,000 2005 155,000 2005 155,000
2004 170,000 2004 170,000 2004 170,000
2003 190,000 2003 190,000 2003 190,000
2002 210,000 2002 210,000 2002 210,000
2001 230,000 2001 230,000 2001 230,000
2000 245,000 2000 245,000 2000 245,000
1999 245,000 1999 245,000 1999 245,000
1998 245,000 1998 245,000 1998 245,000
Boston 2007 Philadelphia 2007 Silicon Valley 2007
2006 145,000 2006 135,000 2006 145,000
2005 155,000 2005 140,000 2005 155,000
2004 170,000 2004 145,000 2004 170,000
2003 190,000 2003 150,000 2003 190,000
2002 210,000 2002 160,000 2002 210,000
2001 230,000 2001 170,000 2001 230,000
2000 245,000 2000 180,000 2000 245,000
1999 245,000 1999 190,000 1999 245,000
1998 245,000 1998 200,000 1998 245,000
Chicago 2007 Raleigh 2007 Tampa 2007
2006 145,000 2006 135,000 2006 125,000
2005 155,000 2005 140,000 2005 130,000
2004 170,000 2004 145,000 2004 135,000
2003 190,000 2003 150,000 2003 140,000
2002 210,000 2002 160,000 2002 150,000
2001 230,000 2001 170,000 2001 160,000
2000 245,000 2000 180,000 2000 170,000
1999 245,000 1999 190,000 1999 180,000
1998 245,000 1998 200,000 1998 190,000
Dallas 2007 Sacramento 2007 Washington, DC 2007
2006 135,000 2006 135,000 2006 145,000
2005 155,000 2005 145,000 2005 155,000
2004 160,000 2004 160,000 2004 170,000
2003 170,000 2003 175,000 2003 190,000
2002 185,000 2002 195,000 2002 210,000
2001 195,000 2001 205,000 2001 230,000
2000 205,000 2000 215,000 2000 245,000
1999 215,000 1999 220,000 1999 245,000
1998 220,000 1998 225,000 1998 245,000
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN
From: Sergi, Vincent A. F.
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:12 PM
To: FRM-Associate
Cc: Sergi, Vincent A. F.; Sprogis, Andrew
Subject: Associate Base Compensation
In recognition of the Firm's continuing success, the efforts of our Associates and changes in the marketplace, the Firm will be increasing Associate salaries in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York and Washington per the chart below. At this time, there are no changes in our Charlotte compensation scale, but we will continue to monitor the market for changes, and will adjust as necessary to remain competitive.
The Associate Compensation Committee will follow up with a memo regarding 2006 Bonuses and 2007 standards shortly. Class increases will be reflected in your March 1, 2007 payroll along with a catch-up payment retroactive to January 1, 2007.
Thanks again for your hard work this year.
Chicago
Los Angeles
Washington New York
2006 $145,000 $160,000
2005 155,000 170,000
2004 170,000 185,000
2003 190,000 210,000
2002 210,000 230,000
2001 225,000 250,000
2000 240,000 265,000
As has been our practice, Associates in classes senior to the class of 2000 will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
_________________________________________________
Vincent A.F. Sergi, Esq.
National Managing Partner
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
JONES DAY (Atlanta)
KING & SPALDING
The Daily Report article that we linked to earlier has been updated, with information about Jones Day (Atlanta) and King & Spalding. Check out the new version over here.
A tipster summarizes it as follows:
K&S matches A&B in Atlanta with $15k more across the board. Jones Day Atlanta goes up $15k as well to $135k (which includes a built-in bonus).
And who's on first?
Alston, King & Spalding and Jones Day announce pay raises [Fulton County Daily Report]
Earlier: Prior ATL coverage of associate pay raise news (scroll down)













Comments
What exactly is going on with Chadbourne? I have seen a whole bunch of rumors both here and on Greedy Associates, but nothing seems to be confirmed.
Anyone?
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 06:54 PM
The memo to DLA Piper came with a huge caveat:
"As communicated in past years, those who meet our admittedly high performance expectations should be confident of receiving the base salary increase that has been set for their practice and market. You will each receive an individual communication by Monday, February 12 confirming your salary. Increases will be retroactive to January 1 and included in paychecks dated February 16."
This is a way of projecting to the world that DLA Piper is increasing Associate salaries while quietly informing many Associates that they will not be receiving salary increases that match the market. Many Associates will likely be held back.
From what I gather, this problem may particularly acute in the Baltimore and Washington offices, where Associates are not getting enough work.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 06:56 PM
Chadbourne has NOT RAISEd. So consider that confirmed.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:04 PM
can we put together a list of NY firms (or from anywhere, who cares) of firms who haven't yet matched??
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 07:06 PM
I'm just a 3L. Can someone please explain the growing gap in compensation between NY and CA associates? There doesn't seem to be much difference in COL. Do NY associates really bill that much more than CA associates? First-year salaries were 125,000 across the board just two years ago and now there's a 15,000 gap; have NY billable hour averages been increasing at a faster rate than CA averages? I'm genuinely curious...
Posted by: FrankMurphy | February 6, 2007 07:07 PM
wow...very glad I didn't take that DLA (AKA The Borg) offer...bad work/life and bad pay.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:08 PM
FrankMurphy - the New York market is driven by a lot of financial markets work that is only or mostly done in NYC. Generally that work has higher margins then other legal work. So most firms with substantial NYC operations make more money there then elsewhere.
That means they have more money to throw around to compete for associates.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:10 PM
confirmation that K&L gates NY matched.
Posted by: anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:11 PM
Post K&L numbers.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:12 PM
So DLA is paying $145K in Seattle? Wonder if anyone will match that. It's pathetic that the local firms are still paying only $100K.
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 07:13 PM
Why is DLA Piper in Dallas paying 135K for first-years and 155K for second-years? Is that a typo for the first year pay? It seems that they meant 145K for that year to be in line with their Austin and other offices.
Posted by: LatFan | February 6, 2007 07:15 PM
Why are Dallas associates at DLA paid less than Austin associates?
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 07:16 PM
Frank: Depends on who you ask. NYers say yes to both your questions (COL and billables). We here in CA say bullshit. (Same as to DC.) And the $15k gap grows to $35k-$65k in the upper levels. Ridiculous.
Yes, I know I'm bitter.....
Posted by: Petey | February 6, 2007 07:17 PM
"I'm just a 3L. Can someone please explain the growing gap in compensation between NY and CA associates? There doesn't seem to be much difference in COL. Do NY associates really bill that much more than CA associates? First-year salaries were 125,000 across the board just two years ago and now there's a 15,000 gap; have NY billable hour averages been increasing at a faster rate than CA averages? I'm genuinely curious..."
I'm going to speculate that supply and demand has something to do with this ...
Posted by: guess | February 6, 2007 07:18 PM
dont have the numbers- the e mail just went out to associates today. i'm sure someone more in the know will post the numbers... i just know they matched 160
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:18 PM
FrankMurphy:
according to the CNN/Money COL calculator:
$160,000 in NYC is equal to:
$116,672.23 in LA;
$134,773.78 in SF;
$114,383.79 in the OC.
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 07:18 PM
7:18 -- I imagine you mean matched 160 in NYC?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:19 PM
yes, i said k&l NY i dont know anything about the other offices.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:20 PM
is there any proof about Ropes?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:27 PM
no proof about Ropes...all rumor and conjecture at this point
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:28 PM
do people think that since mlb is now $145k & dla is now $135k in philly that other philly firms currently paying $125k will raise also?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:30 PM
Seattle: totally messed up market, but the local firms pay more than $100k to start. Before the current round of raises (which is just trickling up here), but big NW firms paid ~$110-$115 to start. Maybe they'll also institute some raises. The national firms pay more. Now Orrick will pay $125 to start, DLA will pay $145. WSGR hasn't raised anywhere yet, but currently pays $135.
Posted by: rex | February 6, 2007 07:40 PM
7:18 --
COL doesn't explain the disparity btw NY-based firms in DC and virtually any firm in LA:
Salary in Washington-Arlington-Alexandria DC-VA: $160,000
Comparable salary in Los Angeles-Long Beach CA: $176,897.5
from CNN's calculator
i.e., DC assocs at 160K are making a KILLING
Posted by: LA assoc | February 6, 2007 07:44 PM
What's the word on the result of the Wiley associates meeting?
Posted by: anon | February 6, 2007 07:45 PM
FrankMurphy 7:07: Law firms base salaries on what they need to pay associates to keep them from leaving to join competing firms or to help with recruiting (as in "we are just as prestigious as X firm because we pay as much as X firm"). Law firms do not care about cost of living. Generally, law firms also do not consider it a problem if an associate in CA bills the same rate for the same number of hours as a NY associate but gets less compensation. This is not a fairness thing, it is a market thing.
Posted by: anonymouslikeahippopotamus | February 6, 2007 07:50 PM
Wiley Rein raised to 145 for first years on the 1950 track, and 125 for first years on the 1800 track. They basically followed Hogan's salary structure, with one or two slight differences in upper-levels.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 07:56 PM
I hear Foley & Lardner also has a similar comp structure as Hogan. What's the deal with that? Has Foley raised in DC, NY and Chicago?
Posted by: Christian | February 6, 2007 08:04 PM
WSGR went to $160 NY, $145 all other offices.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:10 PM
Who the F is WGSR?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:32 PM
7:56, can you explain the "tracks?"
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:33 PM
Can someone post the A&K (Texas) memo?
Posted by: htown | February 6, 2007 08:41 PM
WSGR stands for Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:41 PM
According to greedy WSGR has matched the $160k NYC / $145k elsewhere scale by voicemail. Still no memo though.
http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?topic=Greedy%20SF%2fSV&msg_id=0036qS
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:42 PM
Firms paying 160 in Texas:
Fish and Richardson (Dallas, Austin)
Skadden (Houston)
Weil (Dallas, Houston, Austin)
Firms paying 155 in Texas:
????
Firms paying 145 in Texas:
Gibson Dunn (Dallas)
Patton Boggs (Dallas)
Jenner & Block (Dallas)
DLA Piper (Dallas, Austin)
WSGR (Austin)
Firms paying 135/140:
V&E
Baker Botts
Fulbright
A&K
Akin
Winstead
Locke
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:52 PM
"Why are Dallas associates at DLA paid less than Austin associates?"
That is weird. It's not like the Texas firms are going to pay more in Austin than Dallas.
Was that a DLA, Piper Rudnik or Gray Cary office before? Maybe that has something to do with it? It shouldn't, but that's the only thing I can think of.
I know the office is tiny as well. Could be another reason.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 08:56 PM
8:56:
The only thing that makes sense is politics. How else do you explain that Seattle, Baltimore and Austin are being paid on par with Chicago and D.C.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 09:06 PM
So Chicago firms we're waiting on:
Baker & McKenzie
Kirkland & Ellis
Winston & Strawn
Vedder Price
Foley & Lardner
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 09:17 PM
The MSM has reported the prompting for the recent raise in salaries is due to, at least in large part, to hedge funds competing for lawyers (see the WSJ blog). So it makes sense that the firms with strong investment management competencies would match, since those would be the attorneys first to defect...so that means essentially Seward & Kissel and Schulte in NYC. Schulte matched, but don't see any word from Seward? They were at mkt rate last year when I interviewed with them, but now?
Posted by: Anon | February 6, 2007 09:36 PM
I don't think these Chicago firms announced.
Ungaretti
Bell Boyd
Sachnoff
Seyfarth
Wildman
McGuise Woods
Hinshaw
Lord Bissell
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:01 PM
Also silent in Chicago:
Chapman Cutler
Burke Warren
Bryan Cave
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:03 PM
"7:56, can you explain the "tracks?""
If you bill 1800, you get 125
If you bill 1950, you get 145
The different billable amounts you can choose are called tracks.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:09 PM
Seattle: Two of the biggest Seattle firms ONLY pay 100K. Perkins pays $100 plus a 10 bonus to first years so technically $110K. But Davis Wright only pays $102K - still!! And K&L Gates only changed increased to $115 after the merger so it is only a very recent change. I don't think DLA or WSGR will have much of an impact on the big Seattle firms - but they should or highly qualified candidates are going to start looking elsewhere.
Posted by: anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:21 PM
Foley hasn't announced this year, but first years make 135 at 1850 and 145 at 1950.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:25 PM
I imagine Foley would go to 145 at 1850 and a bit higher at 1950?
Posted by: Christian | February 6, 2007 10:31 PM
Which Foley? Lardner or Hoag?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:43 PM
Lardner. Foley H ain't moving in Boston (at least for now)
Posted by: Ms. Piggy Jr. | February 6, 2007 10:46 PM
Which Foley office are we talking about?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 10:58 PM
holland + knight where are you?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 11:04 PM
Any word on Dechert yet? Any chance they could go to 160 in non-NY offices (a la Fish and Dewey)?
Posted by: Anon | February 6, 2007 11:26 PM
seriously enough with the COL "debate". Accept it as fact. NY is more expensive to live in. You dont believe me, leave CA and come here and STOP WHINING!
Posted by: meow | February 6, 2007 11:55 PM
re: COL issue, CNN's calculator comes up with results that sometimes vary quite a bit with those of bankrate, and these probably differ from all the other calculators. Point is, don't trust just one. For example:
$125,000 in DC/Arlington/Alexandria is worth $189,500 in Manhattan dollars per CNN, and worth $179,400 per bankrate.
$125,000 in LA/Long Beach is worth 171,000 in Manhattan per CNN, but only worth $160,600 per bankrate.
$125,000 in Chicago is worth $134,000 in DC/Arlington/Alexandria per CNN, and worth $151,000 per bankrate.
Those are some significant differences, especially over the course of a few years.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 6, 2007 11:59 PM
WSGR matched but no retroactivity. It only goes back to Feb 1st which is the start of the firm's fiscal year.
Posted by: Anon | February 7, 2007 12:05 AM
Any word on Reed Smith?
Posted by: gmoney | February 7, 2007 12:19 AM
Chadbourne did match, at least through mid levels. Individual memos to each associate.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 12:48 AM
anon 11:26
Dechert.............non-NY 160?
You're a funny guy.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 12:51 AM
Anon 12:51 - Their PPP is nearly $2 million. Going to 160 would be a good way of announcing that they see themselves as on par with the Weil Gotshals and Jones Days of the world.
But you're probably right; wishful thinking on my part.
Posted by: Anon | February 7, 2007 01:28 AM
Can anyone confirm the WSGR scale???
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 08:07 AM
anon 1:28
Don't get me wrong, with their PPP they shpould definitely be going in that direction......but they won't.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 08:34 AM
So no one in Philadelphia has done squat, right?
And Philly complains about the brain drain to NYC and DC....
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:15 AM
philly - no surprise there.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:29 AM
DLA in Philly went to $135k. Check out the DLA Memo from yesterday.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:36 AM
Dechert and Morgan Lewis were already at 135 (from last year).
Nothing is going to happen.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:37 AM
According to Greedy Associates, Drinker Biddle went to $135,000 in Philly.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:39 AM
thought DLA was already at 135K which started last year's raises.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:44 AM
considering two firms in philly have already raised 10k this week in response to the STB raise, I think you're being a little presumptuous in saying nothing is going to happen.
Posted by: anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:49 AM
Fine, no one is going to go above Dechert or Morgan Lewis.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:53 AM
Agreed - 145 is tops for the philly market. i think you'll see pepper, blank, drinker and the other notables go to 135. the only wrinkle in the situation is that drinker was already rumoured to have been making a move to match mlb and dechert prior to the stb raise, so maybe they go to 145, and that might drag the rest of big firms up with them.
Posted by: anonymous | February 7, 2007 09:56 AM
Did DLA really bump in Philly? The memo in this thread doesn't list the Philly office as receiving an increase.
So, the two firms in Philly that bumped are DLA and what?
Posted by: Chris | February 7, 2007 10:07 AM
Did DLA really bump in Philly? The memo in this thread doesn't list the Philly office as receiving an increase.
So, the two firms in Philly that bumped are DLA and what?
Posted by: Chris | February 7, 2007 10:08 AM
If you look in the big memo, with the break down for all offices at the top of the thread, you'll see the philly pay raise. The other firm to make a raise was Morgan Lewis who went to 145. Someone above also reported that Drinker Biddle has gone to 135.
Posted by: anonymous | February 7, 2007 10:12 AM
WHAT is going on with the conflicting Chadbourne rumors? Lat can you please find a source there?
Posted by: anon | February 7, 2007 10:19 AM
Let's take the party over to the new thread:
http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/02/skaddenfreude_the_latest_news.php
Posted by: good housekeeping | February 7, 2007 11:29 AM
DLA sounds MISERABLE
GET OUT ALL OF YOU AT DLA - RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 11:49 AM
MLB in philly is actually at 145k
Posted by: anon | February 7, 2007 02:05 PM
Is Katten Muchin still deferring 'base' compensation?
Posted by: Katten Muchin | February 7, 2007 02:05 PM
What is the problem at DLA? How is it different than other biglawfirms?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 02:08 PM
145k can buy you a lot of pretzels in Philly.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 02:19 PM
145k can buy you a lot of pretzels in Philly.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 02:22 PM
Seattle market sucks
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2007 06:35 PM
Does anyone have confirmation of the rumor that Finnegan Henderson has gone to 160 in DC?
http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0036y9
2006-160
2005-170
2004-185
2003-200
2002-215
2001-230
2000-250
1999-270
5% bonus per 100 hours over 2000 up to 2400 up to 20% merit bonus
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2007 06:19 PM
what is finnegan henderson?
Posted by: anon | February 11, 2007 06:25 PM