Add RSS RSS

Skaddenfreude: Dickstein Shapiro, Friday Open Thread

100 dollar bill Above the Law Above the Law law firm salary legal blog legal tabloid Above the Law.JPGDickstein Shapiro can be removed from the LIST OF SHAME. Their memo appears after the jump.

And here's an open thread, in which you can discuss the latest associate compensation developments. It's a perfect space for speculating, as some of you are already doing, about whether today might be the day for some Texas law firm announcements.

Please continue to send us announcements by email. As we've previously stated, we keep the identities of our tipster confidential (unless attribution is requested). Thanks!

Dickstein Shapiro 1 pay raise base salary Above the Law.JPG

Dickstein Shapiro 2 pay raise base salary Above the Law.JPG

Dickstein Shapiro 3 pay raise base salary Above the Law.JPG

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:46 AM

So wait, Dickstein doesn't pay you $30-50k of your BASE salary until you hit 2300 hours?

That's some serious bullshit right there.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:51 AM

10:46 am,

Deferred compensation is Dickstein-speak for bonus in the DC and LA markets. So you get your base salary (that's a given), and then hours in excess of 2100, 2200, 2300, etc. qualify you for a bonus ("deferred compensation"). See table in memo above.

avatar
3 Posted by Hoping In Texas | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:51 AM

BB? V&E? FJ? Who is going to step up to the plate today?

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:56 AM

Could Dickstein come up with a more complex set of descriptors for its associate classes?

avatar
5 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:58 AM

did they raise the billable requirements for their bonus structure? I'm just amazed at how much better my "shame list" compensation is (hours v. comp + bonus) than that (or at least was yesterday before they raised salaries)

avatar
6 Posted by Big Tex | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 10:58 AM

My guess is Fulbright, they want to help erase the little recruiting slip of the tongue incident.

avatar
7 Posted by Bigger Tex | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 11:01 AM

^
|
|

Riiiiiiigght. You keep on thinking that. Don't hold your breath on FJ coming to the rescue.

avatar
8 Posted by Terminator | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 11:06 AM

Duane Morris has raised to $135,000 for first-year associates in the Philadelphia office (see law.com).

avatar
9 Posted by Biggest Tex | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 11:07 AM

V&E has the most to lose by remaining below BB. My bet is with them. Then again, I doubt they want to be leap frogged again.

avatar
10 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:03 PM

C'mon Texas, let's get the ball rolling and make this a good weekend for everyone!

avatar
11 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:13 PM

So the NY office isn't lockstep bonuses?

avatar
12 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:29 PM

If the deferred compensation list is supposed to signify a "bonus," these guys are incredibly cheap. There is no bonus if you are under 2100 hours. Pathetic. Last year I billed 1998 hours at a top 25 firm (according to Vault) and got a $40k bonus. I would have to work an extra 302 hours to get $30k at Dickstein. Unbelievable.

avatar
13 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:30 PM

If the deferred compensation list is supposed to signify a "bonus," these guys are incredibly cheap. There is no bonus if you are under 2100 hours. Pathetic. Last year I billed 1998 hours at a top 25 firm (according to Vault) and got a $40k bonus. I would have to work an extra 302 hours to get $30k at Dickstein. Unbelievable.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:47 PM

have any other philly firms raised? i know dechert, mlb, dla, blank rome, duane morris... any others?

avatar
15 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 12:55 PM

Is the amount of deferred compensation on the chart what an associate gets for each level of hours incrementally or is it the cumulative amount in each box?

avatar
16 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 1:03 PM

So any word on the street about forthcoming Texas raises? Speculation about what Big Tex firms are thinking?

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 1:16 PM

last time firms raised salaries, f&j took two months after the initial set of raises to match the market. my guess is that it will happen, but not for a while. f&j has missed out on the opportunity to grab headlines by falling into lockstep with the big NY firms immediately, and it already has its summer class set for 2007. so until serious recruiting starts again, they will be in no rush to bump.

avatar
18 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 1:53 PM

You have listed all the Philly firms that have raised.

avatar
19 Posted by A | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 2:04 PM

what philly firms have raised - and to what?

avatar
20 Posted by In the Know | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 2:11 PM

Dickstein claims that its bonus structure (deferred compensation) is so low because it wants to discourage its associates from working any more than the 1950 minimum a year. Of course people who end up working that much out of no choice of their own get fucked.

avatar
21 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 2:23 PM

Dechert/Morgan- $145,000

Duane/DLA Piper/Blank- $135,000

These are the only firms that have raised.

avatar
22 Posted by Dissatisfied | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 2:31 PM

Yeah, Dickstein giveth with one hand and yanks it right back with the other. Contrary to their inflated egos, they are by no means a top tier firm.

avatar
23 Posted by In the Know | Permalink Friday, February 23, 2007 3:17 PM

Well, Dissatisfied, if you work there, I understand why Dickstein is "by no means a top firm." Using "they" and "their" to describe "it" and "its" - pathetic.

avatar
24 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 24, 2007 8:32 AM

Drinker in Philadelphia also raised to 135 but it is not effective until September 07.

avatar
25 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Saturday, February 24, 2007 8:54 AM

I heard Drinker raised for their NJ offices but not for Philly. If they raised for Philly why didn't they bother to tell anybody?

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:49 PM

time for an update to the List of Shame

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 12:46 PM

the SHAMEFUL final 11:
43. Baker & McKenzie (3)
50. Fulbright & Jaworski (36)
58. Vinson & Elkins (39)
75. Nixon Peabody (64)
77. Bryan Cave (56)
82. Reed Smith (33)
83. Dorsey & Whitney (68)
86. McGuireWoods (65)
90. Baker & Hostetler (73)
92. Mintz Levin (91)
100. Seyfarth Shaw (66)

SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME SHAME

avatar
28 Posted by Anon | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 8:09 PM

The Real List of Shame

17. Williams & Connolly
42. Freshfields
43. Baker & McKenzie
45. Boies Schiller
50. Fulbright & Jaworski
56. Irell & Manella
58. Vinson & Elkins
71. Patton Boggs
75. Nixon Peabody
77. Bryan Cave
80. Howrey
82. Reed Smith
83. Dorsey & Whitney
87. Squire Sanders
89. Finnegan Henderson
90. Baker & Hostetler
92. Mintz Levin
93. Kilpatrick Stockton
94. Fenwick & West
96. Venable
100. Seyfarth Shaw

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 9:38 PM

Venable sucks. They wont raise ... lame Baltimore firm.

avatar
30 Posted by anon | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:16 PM

Why is Squire Sanders even mentioned? they're a has-been. i hear theyre still at 125,000

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:20 PM

a little bird told me that Reed Smith is in danger of losing at least 2 associates in the DC & Philly offices if they do not raise soon ...

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, February 25, 2007 11:47 PM

ooh, two associates

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, February 26, 2007 6:24 AM

In response to the question about why Drinker didn't tell anyone if they raised in Philly. My only knowledge is the Legal Intelligencer (Philly's legal paper) which noted that Drinker raised to 135, effective in Sept.

avatar
34 Posted by Bigtex | Permalink Monday, February 26, 2007 8:00 AM

Can Anyone Confirm

http://www.infirmation.com/bboard/clubs-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0037SB

Post Your Comment