Add RSS RSS

Even More Prestigious Than Gallion & Spielvogel?

Addison Butler LLP Stephan Addison Benjamin Butler Stephen Addison.jpgWe're short on time, so we'll have to be brief. But we expect that you will have plenty of comments on this post.

First read this. Then read this. Thoughts?

Our two reactions:

1. This wins the Gallion & Spielvogel award for Self-Aggrandizement by a Boutique Law Firm:

Addison & Butler LLP is a full service law firm with its primary office located in the City of Chicago. Incorporating years of experience practicing law at two of the nation’s largest and most prestigious law firms, the attorneys of Addison & Butler LLP offer a full range of legal services for businesses and individuals nationwide.

"Primary office"? From their contact info page, it looks like it's their ONLY office.

2. We think that Stephan Addison and Benjamin Butler will work well as a team. They've been through a lot together. And it sounds like they certainly have affection for each other, too.

Addison & Butler LLP [official website]

Earlier: Biglaw Boys Up To No Good

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:02 PM

Well, with 2 lawyers, the idea of a branch office sounds a little silly.

If I were one of the lawyers, I'd get 3 cell phones, each with a different area code, and I'd refer to one as my "San Francisco office," another as my "New York office," and the third as my "DC office."

I'd also note on the website that I was considering expansion.

avatar
2 Posted by Anon Mouse | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:13 PM

Well that's just outstanding. I have a suggested addition to their firm summary for the web site:

"Allow us to take the wheel and drive your legal problems away. If your business comes to a grinding halt, we will provide the lubricant so you can get back on the road to success. Our tag-team approach to problem-solving allows us to penetrate even the most challenging issues."

avatar
3 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:19 PM

If I open a boutique firm and give it a prestigious website, will anyone buy it?

I envision a site where all text looks like fountain pen on parchment paper.

avatar
4 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:24 PM

4:02 - looks like they already did that with their Chicago office. Belmont Avenue is solidly in 773 territory (on the North Side of the city), yet they got a 312 area code. Makes me wonder if their "primary" office phone is also their "primary" cell phone number.

avatar
5 Posted by jrs | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:29 PM

I live right by their, um, office.

Next door to Addison & Butler, LLP, one can visit Good Morning Colonic and Skin Care.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:40 PM

Can one be Order of the Coif and cum laude at the same time? At my school, and at most schools I am familiar with, the math works out that you have to at least be magna cum laude to qualify for the Order.

avatar
7 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:42 PM

"Can one be Order of the Coif and cum laude at the same time?"

I don't know, but apparently they can cum loudly. Bwaha.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:43 PM

These two kids both graduated from law school in 2004.

"Years of experience": what a Gallionesq statement.

I bet they know more about criminal law that corporate or real estate law.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:46 PM

4:40, it's possible. My school was a bit more stingy than magna, and magna came out to roughly top 5% of the class.

avatar
10 Posted by 4:46 | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:47 PM

"a bit more stingy than yours w/r/t magna," I meant to say...

...as if anyone cares

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 4:49 PM

"full service law firm":

hmm

avatar
12 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:11 PM

I love how they describe their experience - "represented buyers and sellers in complex corporate mergers, stock purchases and asset purchases ranging in value from $200,000 to $200 million, and has provided general corporate advice to businesses both prior to and following such transactions" (the big firm practice that they left behind); "also represents individuals who have suffered personal injury as a result of someone else’s negligence" (the PI work they aspire to); "also handles legal matters in the areas of DUI defense, traffic violations and other criminal defense, divorces, landlord-tenant disputes and general real estate matters" (what they know they'll really be doing).

avatar
13 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:14 PM

This is an entertaining site with a sordid pedigree, but overall it's no match for GSBarristers. I went back and checked their cached page at findlaw, just to be sure I wasn't misremembering, and I was right - G & S hit it completely out of the park. That record is going to stand for some time.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:30 PM

Well that's lovely. Proof that you can do anything short of murder (hell, maybe murder too) and still keep your license to practice law.

Anyone who doubts what liars these pricks are only needs to take a peek at their website, where they conveniently leave off their class years.

Assholes.

avatar
15 Posted by WHTFH | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:44 PM

All I know is, one of them stole the other's graphic. Compare:

http://www.internalinvestigationlaw.com/

and

http://www.addisonbutler.com/1101.html

avatar
16 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:47 PM

4:24,

Note that though their primary phone numbers are 312, their fax number is 773.

I'd say it's pretty sure that their primary phones are cell phones.

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:48 PM

(1) I wonder what these biggest law firms are....

(2) Are they trying for a record number of local bar association memberships? Kinda odd to be a member of more than a dozen local bar associations, and yet only one federal court....

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 5:58 PM

Snobs. These are two small time lawyers hustling to make a buck. Give em a break.

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 6:02 PM

5:58, "hustling" is a good thing?

avatar
20 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 6:14 PM

I'm a little hazy on my MPRE rules for lawyer advertising, but is it possible the website violates some ethics rules? If not, it seems like it should. As one of the other posters noted, leaving off class years, combined with the language "years of experience" seems designed to fool people into thinking they've been in practice for longer than they actually have.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 6:26 PM

6:14

good observation.

"years of experience,"-- technically, one could say 2 years is "years" of experience since it is more than one year.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 6:41 PM

5:58 listens to too much rap

avatar
23 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 7:08 PM

5:14

they are two small time lawyers who only formed a firm together because they were fired from their jobs b/c they are sex offenders. So no, i think i can laugh at them guilt free.

avatar
24 Posted by HA | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 7:41 PM

I absolutely LOVE that they list DUIs as part of their practice. I'm sure they get a lot of business from their frat brothers... you know, the guys they used to drink and rape women with.

avatar
25 Posted by Richie Cunningham | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 8:00 PM

Someone should email them to solicit their services but ask when they graduated from school.

Also, suckfest.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 8:53 PM

eh... after the Duke lacrosse thing, maybe we should be a little hesitant to assume that these guys are sex offenders who didn't get caught.

avatar
27 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 9:08 PM

8:53: Unlike the Duke defendants, who have pledged to fight the charges until they're proven innocent, these guys have already pled guilty to sex charges (although not the ones they were originally charged with).

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:00 PM

4:40

Yes, and if your school really gives magna to everyone in the top ten percent, that's kind of ridiculous.

At my school, about 3-5 people per year get magna (which may be on the other end of the ridiculous spectrum)

avatar
29 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:36 PM

WHTFH@5:44, excellent observation regarding the shared graphic.

Seriously, though, can you blame them? Is there anything quite so classic and symbolic as the white guy/white guy handshake motif?

avatar
30 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:51 PM

at my school only one person got magna and it had been years since it happend

avatar
31 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 1:31 AM

At my school, magna is easy to get - it's based on GPA, not class rank, so has become pretty much the top 25%. Summa is the tough one. I say Coif is the only thing that matters.

avatar
32 Posted by Gadzooks | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 8:45 AM

I don't think they stole the handshake graphic. It just looks like they shop at the same design-a-web-site shop.

As for Magna at Wisconsin:

Students graduating with a weighted average of 90 or better on reported numerical grades may be recommended by the faculty for graduation, summa cum laude.
Students graduating with a weighted average of 87.5 or better on reported numerical grades may be recommended by the faculty for graduation, magna cum laude.
Students who graduate with a weighted average of 85.5 or better on reported numerical grades may be recommended by the faculty for graduation, cum laude.

87.5 corresponds to somewhere around top 8-10%

avatar
33 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 9:14 AM

Fake. Fake. Fake. One of these guys was doing real estate (selling, not transactions) the last I heard of him. No way they consummated their love for each other by going into business together.

avatar
34 Posted by Bar Police | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 9:20 AM

Legal services nationwide? They're only licensed in 2 states - that's called practicing law w/o a license in the other 48 + DC.

avatar
35 Posted by Windy City Watcher | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 9:30 AM

Their business address is an apartment in the Lakeview area of Lincoln Park - only a short hop skip and a jump from "Boys Town." Perhaps a merger with Charney would be an appropriate outcome.

avatar
36 Posted by Not a lawyer, just dating one | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 9:39 AM

How can they still practice? Couldn't they get disbarred for what they pled guilty to?

avatar
37 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 10:06 AM

5:58 and 8:53 -- Read the links and get to know the backs tory. The posters aren't making fun of these losers just for the website, or idly speculating that they might be sex offenders due to their frat boy image. There are guilty pleas and sworn statements confirming that they are dirtbags!!

avatar
38 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 10:10 AM

9:08PM, according to the earlier post, they pled guilty to "reckless endangerment of safety and sexual gratification in public."

I'm not sure what the first charge is about, but the second one sounds like people getting it on in the back seat of a car. If that's actually all these guys did, they probably deserve a break.

If they're actually rapists who got away, though, they deserve whatever bad stuff happens to them for the rest of their lives.

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 10:23 AM

I think we're going to see more firms develop joint M&A/slip-and-fall practice groups. The synergies are undeniable.

avatar
40 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:09 AM

9:30am

I did google satellite map search of address (super zoom), and it surely does look like a regular street with lowrise buildings and store fronts.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:11 AM

On the other hand, these two men probably were in dire straits. With their reputation probably in shatters, they probably could not find legal employment. Starting a new law office in a fancy building can be a very expensive undertaking.

avatar
42 Posted by Margaret Daun | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:24 AM

I suppose blogs are designed to encourage anonymous mudslinging, but this is insane!

Entertain this hypothetical: these guys did nothing wrong except hook up with a crazy chick who accused them of rape. The fact is they plead to charges that have absolutely NO ASPECT of physical force or violence - and certainly NO ASPECT of rape. Nor does the record contain proof of any rape, sexual assault, or physcial violence of any kind. Bottom line is that no one except these guys and the alleged victim knows exactly what happened. If they didn't sexually assault this woman, then their careers have been permanently damaged and most posters on this blog are only adding to the damage. SHAME ON YOU!

Since lawyers don't drink, I suppose no one on this blog has ever had a few cocktails and done something of questionable judgment. Hypocrisy always runs rampant when people don't have to own up to their judgments of others.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:33 AM

Margaret: Don't blame blogs, blame the MSM. They're much more powerful, and they're the ones pushing the "these guys got off easy" story:

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=553312

This blog, and the commenters, are just adding their two cents to what the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

avatar
44 Posted by Margaret Daun | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:45 AM

And I had a few words for the Journal Sentinel as well:

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=554732

And let's be honest - this blog and the commenters would be adding their two cents regardless of the Journal Sentinel reporting.

avatar
45 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:49 AM

You think the law office of Addison & Butler, LLP is taking resumes and would be interested in recent graduates of second tier law schools?

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:57 AM

Margaret: Good letter to the editor.

A question: Do you have any personal connection to the defendants?

avatar
47 Posted by exploited | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 12:07 PM

To those of you who think their office phone is a mobile, you are living in the 1990s.

These days you can get a phone number in just about any area code that has numbers available and have it ring anywhere in the world you have an internet connection with a $15/month Vonage or SunRocket account. For $5/month more, you can get additional numbers in additional area codes that ring the same phone.

Why they wouldn't shell out another $10/month for a fax number in the same area code as their voice line is beyond me.

avatar
48 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 12:09 PM

that letter to the editor doesn't add much value. yes, the judge can exercise discretion, but the critics' point is that this was a poor exercise of judicial discretion.

avatar
49 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 12:45 PM

To those griping about their stated "years of experience"... Actually both men were admitted to the Illinois Bar in 2003. They did work at their respective firms up until the very day of their convictions. That's 3 1/2 years each at both firms, seven years total between the two of them. To say "years of experience" isn't misleading.

avatar
50 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 12:50 PM

If you do a simple reverse number lookup on the internet, you will find that their office numbers are Sprint cell phones.

avatar
51 Posted by Yo | Permalink Friday, March 2, 2007 11:29 PM

The letter write is same class year as the clowns, so probably, yes, there is a connection.

avatar
52 Posted by Anon | Permalink Saturday, March 3, 2007 9:15 AM

Good God people, you really need to find more to do with your time. Doing a reverse look up on a phone number and looking up the address with satellite maps is simply pathetic.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Sunday, March 4, 2007 3:13 PM

Anon, 9:15 am,

And you need to find more to do with your time than wasting your time by commenting on a comment that you find to be a waste of time.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, March 6, 2007 11:49 AM

Idiots. Honestly, after being convicted and pleading guilty. They go and open up an LLC and post it on the internet where people can easily see their recent criminal record.

Morons.

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, March 10, 2007 3:11 PM

This post is on the first page of Google hits for Gallion & Spielvogel

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:38 PM

these two are such d-bags... I hope they enjoy traffic court.
I wonder the connection of that girl above...

Post Your Comment