(We were a little distracted by a technical glitch with the site that some commenters pointed out. But we think it has been fixed now, so we're back to blogging on the hearings.)

Since our last post, there have been some exciting developments. Sen. Pat Leahy's questioning was pretty boring; he walked Sampson through a bunch of emails, deposition-style.

But things got more interesting when Sen. Arlen Specter took over. Playing his role as Senate moderate, he asked some questions that could be viewed as friendly, and some as hostile. Senator Specter got Sampson to admit that some of Alberto Gonzales's prior testimony was not consistent with Sampson's recollection.

Things got even hotter during Sen. Chuck Schumer's questioning. In a "yes or no," Perry Mason-esque line of cross-examination, Senator Schumer got Sampson to admit -- under oath, and with apparent reluctance -- that several of AG Gonzales's prior statements were "not accurate," or at least not consistent with Sampson's recollection. Ruh-roh...

You could tell that Senator Schumer was scoring points because Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), a smart and savvy former prosecutor and judge, piped up in the middle of Schumer's questioning. Senator Cornyn angrily protested that Sen. Schumer was being unfair in not allowing Kyle Sampson, a witness testifying under oath, to answer questions fully. Exciting stuff!

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) is trying too hard. It seems like he is looking for something to be upset about.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) sounds like Alec Baldwin with a lisp. He is vaguely ridiculous.

Okay, it's lunchtime. In recess until 1:45 PM.

Earlier: Kyle Sampson Inside the Lions' Den