Alberto Gonzales: In the Hot Seat (Part 1)
We're liveblogging Attorney General Alberto Gonzales's
desperate fight for his political life testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is just getting underway. Our commentary will be added continuously to this post (until we eventually migrate to a new post). So just refresh your browser for the latest.
9:35: Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), SJC Chairman, has been reading a lengthy introductory statement. It's way harsh on AlGo.
(Nice tie, Senator Leahy -- alternating mint and forest green stripes. And a crisp white shirt -- not a button-down-collar, thankfully. Politicians dress so much better than judges.)
9:41: Leahy gets in a dig about the White House being content to turn U.S. Attorney's Offices into outposts of the Bush Administration.
The camera cuts to Gonzales, whose lower lip juts out defiantly -- and he shakes his head vigorously, to show disagreement with Leahy's statement. Will the famously mild-mannered Gonzales actually display some cojones?
More discussion after the jump.
9:47: Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) frames the issue as whether Alberto Gonzales should continue to serve as Attorney General. He tells Gonzales he bears "a heavy burden of proof" in reestablishing his credibility. Specter, a former prosecutor, refers to today's hearing as AlGo's "day in court."
9:54: Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) tries to preemptively attack AlGo. He says he doesn't want to hear meandering answers, conclusory statements, and "I don't knows."
Schumer also tries to manage expectations, suggesting that we're not really going to find a smoking gun: "We're not going to find an email saying, 'Fire Carol Lam because she's prosecuting Duke Cunningham.'"
9:58: Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL): "You are a good person. Be forthright with this committee. Give it your best shot, 'cause you are a good person."
('Cause you're good enough, strong enough, and doggone it, people like you...)
10:05: AlGo's opening statement is thankfully brief. Short and sweet. Says he doesn't want to repeat his previously released, written statement. He's speaking a little more assertively than usual; perhaps he has been taking public speaking classes.
10:09: Leahy is questioning AlGo about former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias and Sen. Pete Domenici's involvement in Iglesias's dismissal. Wants to know when exactly Iglesias lost the AG's confidence, etc.
10:14: Oooh, our first shouting match of the day! It's between Senator Leahy and AlGo. Leahy is attacking the claim that David Iglesias was dismissed partly because he wasn't around the office enough -- that he was an "absentee landlord." He points out that some of Gonzales's close associates, such as Bill Mercer, play two roles -- U.S. Attorney for Montana and Acting Associate Attorney General -- and that Mercer is only in Montana three days a week.
Gonzales: Well, nobody complained about Patrick Fitzgerald serving as U.S. Attorney for Chicago while prosecuting the Scooter Libby case...
This REALLY gets Leahy's goat. Leahy raises his voice and says I'm not talking about Pat Fitzgerald, I'm talking about Bill Mercer...
10:23: Shouting match #2, this time between Sen. Specter and Gonzales. Specter is getting impatient because he feels that Gonzales isn't answering his questions directly.
Gonzales is actually being pretty forceful this morning. But is he coming across as too defensive? (A minute after the shouting match, he actually apologizes to Senator Specter.)
Update: Liveblogging continues here.

I'm eating a cranberry scone. And it is actually quite wonderful ...
Leahy is a d-bag
Give it up on the button-down shirt issue, Lat. You totally lost that poll.
Schumer is also a d-bag
This hearing isn't going to settle anything. Gonzales should resign, but he won't. Bush should fire him, but he won't. That's all.
Poor choice on the "guns blazing" Lat.
Lat:
Your comment about coming out with "guns blazing" is a little insensitive in light of the Va Tech. tragety no?
Gonzales is a d-bag
That's not fair to Lat. That's a common phrase, and there's no obvious connection between this hearing and the Va tragedy. Ease up.
1) Like the spunk he's got today--not taking any of AG's tude.
2) What the hell is going on with his left eye?
Completely fair. I'm not all for the PC world, but it's completely fair to point it out as poor choice.
Lat has changed the "guns blazing" reference to "cojones." Is that offensive because Gonzales is Hispanic?
Cojones -- perfect, Lat. Thanks.
"AlGo" is offensive because it makes me thing of Al Gore, who is a d-bag
Since when do you let people edit your work, Lat?? I think this was lame. You could let people get offended by your word choice all day. You're opening a dangerous door here, my friend, imho.
Wow - This is REALLY FRIGHTENING (and a little empowering...well the feeling for a moment anyway) I was COMPLETELY EFFING AROUND when I wrote that! I just wanted to get some people all riled up! AND LAT CHANGED IT???!!! That makes NO SENSE AT ALL
Corp. Girl - you were right on the money!!!
This is indeed sad...
Gonzales can't win. He's trying to escape blame by saying he wasn't very involved in the process. But that just shows incompetence.
Yesterday Lattman removes asshole from the title of his post in reponse to readers' comments. Now Lat removes the reference to guns blazing.
Suck it up, boys; stick to your guns.
(ha)
drop AlGo.
use AGAG or Gonzo instead
That word change doesn't make Lat a "pushover." It's liveblogging. It's more fluid and changeable than regular blogging.
People attack Lat's rightward leanings, but he still keeps leaning right (like that abortion post of his from yesterday). I don't think he is particularly sensitive to reader criticism.
what happened to the liveblogging? those of us without tv's at work are wondering
I would go so far as to say that all the dems on the judiciary committee are d-bags.
wow, 10:55, look at the courage, bravery and cajones you must have to make such an asinine and moronic statement.
i never realized that it took courage bravery or cojones to recognize a douchebag...
10:57 -- you certainly are a d-bag.
perhaps, but i don't think my d-baggery is related to my calling out of morons on this site.
BURY THE BIBLE-BEATING BEANER!!!
10:53 -- don't know if you can listen.
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3
10:53 -- also try
www.wnyc.org
it is not polite to call someone a "beaner." even a d-bag like GONZO.
10:57:
Who on the judiciary committee are you standing up for? Ted Kennedy? Herb Kohl? Joe Biden? Dick Durbin? Russ Feingold? Chuck Schumer? Diane Feinstein?
My comment was not assinine; it was factual. They're all d-bags.
On behalf of beaners everywhere, I take offense to the reference to Gonzo as a beaner. We gave him away to the white folks shortly after the blacks gave away Condoleeza Rice.