The Jurisdiction Stripper: More on Adriana Dominguez
Here's the promised follow-up to our earlier post about Adriana Dominguez, the Brooklyn Law School 3L who has embarked upon a career as a Playboy TV stripper.
Remember the similarly named Adrienne -- the Boston College Law School student who did a racy spread for Barstool Sports? Adrienne ain't got nothing on Adriana. Adriana Dominguez doesn't just do soft-core, Sports Illustrated swimsuit-style spreads; she takes it all off. And she works it for the camera.
More discussion, including some comments from her classmates at BLS, after the jump.
In no particular order, here are some random tidbits about Adriana Dominguez:
1. Adriana Dominguez is 24 years old, and she did her undergraduate work at the University of Pennsylvania. So that makes her an Ivy Leaguer, as the NYDN notes.
2. She has shown a commitment to public service. She interned in the Brooklyn District Attorney's office, in the domestic violence unit.
3. According to this comment, she's not on any journal at BLS. But she is active in extracurriculars, serving as treasurer of her law school’s Legal Association of Activist Women. See here (which also includes her email address).
4. She explained her decision to make the video as follows:
"I wanted to do something a little crazy before I graduate and do become a lawyer ... do something kind of out of character... Lawyers can be boring."
5. The Playboy TV episode that she starred in was aired back in January, but it's only getting widespread play now, thanks to the circulation of a video clip by email.
6. Here are a few random comments from students and alumni of Brooklyn Law School:
"My friends say she's super-tacky. In any case, the blond dye job looks awful.""It should be noted that the young man holding her vagina and, at one point, spanking her ass, is also a Brooklyn Law student...."
"Up until today, I was glad that I was not Loyola 2L. Now I'm not too sure. Good thing I'm a solo or else I'd have to fire myself for being an alum."
"The ad for the full-length video is attached, and is worth the viewing. The guy who grabs her ass at the end is one of the bigger jerks at school. He was in my section and always insisted on having a post-exam rundown, which inevitably (and embarrassingly) revealed him having missed a glaringly obvious issue."
"Adriana says she doesn't know how it was leaked. A friend of a friend's boyfriend works at Playboy TV, and the minute he heard about it, it began circulating around school."
"I'm a 3L at BLS and we've been laughing at her for the past month. Wonder how the Brooklyn DA will feel about this?"
We do note, in the video, that Adriana says she likes being spanked. How will her supervisors in the Domestic Violence Unit feel about that?
Various rumors have been circulating about whether Adriana lost a government job offer as a result of the video. If you can confirm (or deny), please drop us a line (subject line: "Adriana Dominguez"). Thanks.
It's Juris-Imprudence: Holy Torts! Law Student in Erotic Vid [New York Daily News]
Brooklyn Law School Student Bares All [WSJ Law Blog]
Earlier: Meet Adriana Dominguez: Aspiring Lawyer Cum Porn Star













Comments
OK, spill it. What's the guy's name? He needs to have it all over the internet and have his job offers rescinded too.
Posted by: female-type | April 10, 2007 02:38 PM
NY Daily News needs to get a clue. At tier 2 schools like Brooklyn, all but the top 10% take sweatshop jobs at ID firms paying $50k.
That's far from being a "Top Law Student."
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 10, 2007 02:44 PM
Adrienne: 180
Adriana: 122
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 02:49 PM
hey -- aquagirl got a 10th cir clerkship. who knows where this girl will end up...
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 02:51 PM
2:49: So true. I wish Adrienne had shown as much as Adriana.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 02:51 PM
Interesting question: if doing porn isn't DING! worthy for the act itself, but rather for the 'poor judgment' that such a decision reveals, why is doing porn automatically poor judgment? Sounds like an indirect way of imposing the same 'virgin/lawyer or whore/unemployable' framework to me.
That 'the client will care' isn't a different answer from saying the partners don't approve of respectable women doing porn. Instead, it just uses societal misogyny to repress the woman, rather than the decision-maker's misogyny. If your firm had a racist client, could you DING! a new hire just for being black?
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 02:55 PM
I just left posts on the WSJ law blog, and the NY Daily News to express my outrage at how badly NY Daily News missed the point.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/04/10/brooklyn-law-school-student-bares-all/
http://www.nydailynews.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=3569
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 10, 2007 02:57 PM
post the pictures
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 03:11 PM
the video is on FoxNews
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 03:18 PM
"the video is on FoxNews"
Gotta love the Ron Jeremy-look-a-like associated with the jumpy horny happy girls website, or whatever it's called.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 03:32 PM
i know i shouldn't respond to L2L but....i am a BLS alum, not in the top 10% and I have a big firm job......
Posted by: BLS Alum | April 10, 2007 03:33 PM
3:33, what portion of BLS students get good jobs?
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 10, 2007 03:39 PM
L2L -- all of the ones with self respect.
Posted by: Let the Eagle Soar | April 10, 2007 03:50 PM
I respect myself. That's why I speak out against the tier 2 fraud. Self respect doesn't get you a decent job. You need a degree from a good school.
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 10, 2007 03:52 PM
L2L,
Although we at BLS wear the scarlet tier 2 as well, the USNWR really gives us the screws. But hey all I know is I'm not top 10% and I landed a biglaw summer associate position - but you do need to do fairly well- Regardless we can all agree that Ms. D is no "top student" anyway you define the term.
Posted by: BLS anon | April 10, 2007 03:59 PM
http://www.gothamist.com/2007/04/10/play_law.php
What's up with those ribs?
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:07 PM
Great, like we really need another reason for people to think BLS is a joke.
Posted by: anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:10 PM
2:55 - yeah, being a stripper is just like being black
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:14 PM
This hasn't even been limited to the BLS community:
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=593261&mc=148&forum_id=2
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:15 PM
2:55 - yeah, thinking circulating naked pictures of yourself is unprofessional = misogyny - another excellent point
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:15 PM
As a feminist, I can say with great effect that this girl is a f'ing idiot. I have NO problem with porn, but I do have a problem with hiring lawyers who don't understand the concept of "long-term consequence." I mean, maybe this is something you do when you're 19 and drunk...but 25, sober, and on a career-path...that's just sabotage.
Posted by: Legally chocolate | April 10, 2007 04:20 PM
She says she wonders how it got leaked, yet it's been in her myspace and AIM profile for months now
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:21 PM
I was already asked about the video and the Daily News article on a job interview for no other reason than I go to Brooklyn Law.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:26 PM
The worst thing she can do now is to cower or express regret. Still seems arguable whether or not this was a bad decision on her part. IMO best course of action for her is to say that she doesnt want the extra attention, but is confident in her feminity and has no regrets about the spread. To admit bad judgment will invite extra scrutiny from those who might seek to hold her back while at the same time putting off the more liberal folk who might hire her. The photos are purposefully non-erotic. She could give this a positive spin with ease so long as she can shrug off the critics.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 04:32 PM
4:26 - What firm? Are they still hiring?
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 10, 2007 04:44 PM
Is this her?
http://www.brooklaw.edu/news/barristersball2007/gallery/large/image39.jpg
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 05:15 PM
lol L2L completely hijacked the NY Daily News discussion board.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/04/10/2007-04-10_its_jurisimprudence-2.html
Posted by: anon | April 10, 2007 05:29 PM
Daily News and CW11 were interviewing students as they left the school today.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 05:38 PM
She needs to parlay this into a 6 or 7 movie deal with Vivid Productions. No, she's not the hottest girl, but she's got name recognition, baby.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 05:45 PM
5:45, what she has is fool appeal. "Oh, you were that BLS skank whose bare ass I watched get spanked on my firms computer, I guess I can interview you for fun just to say I did.."
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 05:51 PM
There is such a double-standard to this discussion, I simply cannot stand it. It appears that there was at least one male BLS student in this video, and he is not being held up for shame, ridicule, critique, and whatever else people are heaping on Ms. Dominguez though--duh--he actively participated in porn, too. Why is this dude sacrosanct? I think being a sideline perv in a porn video--including acts such as "holding her vagina"-- is actually much more ripe for contempt than being the star of such a show. Lat, by not being more aggressive in seeking his identity, I think you are disappointingly condoning this double standard; surely he is just as ripe fodder for our amusement. Someone MUST out this guy, or Joe Francis might as well become our next AG.
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:14 PM
6:18: His name is Sean Kalish. Happy now?
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 06:16 PM
6:16, this is 6:14. Thanks for the info, but not by half. This whole story should never just have been about the female student, but about both of them. In the long run, it's her name that will be smeared, and it's her that people won't take seriously; Mr. Kalish will probably just get a few rounds of frat boy haw-haws from the old boy network out of this.
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:22 PM
6:14
He had his clothes on. If he didn't, perhaps we'd be talking about him too. But, then again, as you yourself admit, he was not "the star of the show."
Posted by: Devastating Logic | April 10, 2007 06:31 PM
6:22 PM:
I do think you're right about the double standard and I've only seen part of the video.
But I think we can all make a distinction between getting nekkid for a Playboy production and playing an ancillary role in the production.
I really do think that if the tables were turned, we'd be guffawing over a male law student who did something similar. Or am I wrong?
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 06:32 PM
6:14, it's 6:12 again. I agree with you which is why I put his name out there. I hope someone does something with it like outting him.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 06:39 PM
This is 6:22. Please people, he was holding the vagina of his classmate on tape! As can be easily discerned from ATL, you don't have to shed your clothes to become the butt (no pun intended) of your professional community's jokes. I hate to play it, but how about the porn exploitation of women angle? I sure as heck hope that guy does not work in the family, domestic violence, or similar areas--and even if you're big business, do YOU want that guy with his hands on your files? While I recognize the difference between a little sex play and DV, one can easily envision Ms. Dominguez as the victim of some patriarchy-type action at work here--with Mr. Kalish as lead/enabling exploiter.
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:43 PM
2:55 et al.,
Personally I'm all in favor of every hot young female lawyer doing porn. So get on it, girls.
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:47 PM
6:12, this is 6:22/6:14. Your actions are much appreciated in the spirit of fairness, but I think we both know that it is highly unlikely anything will really happen to this guy. Thanks, though. Sigh.
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:48 PM
http://www.brooklaw.edu/facebook/photo2/sean.kalish.jpg
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 06:58 PM
Again, I'd hit it. Multiple times, in fact.
Personally, I can think of about 25 women from my law school class and in my legal community, who I'd like to see exposing themselves on tape in a similar manner.
Yes, I'm a chauvinistic pig, but I'm also a guy with hormones which demand attention.
Posted by: WGWIG | April 10, 2007 06:59 PM
Does anybody have a link to the video that works?
Posted by: anon | April 10, 2007 07:00 PM
Does anyone have this video? Please email to adrianavid_2@yahoo.com. Thanks!
Posted by: Anon | April 10, 2007 07:07 PM
picsplz kthxbye. :)
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 07:46 PM
"Again, I'd hit it. Multiple times, in fact."
So would I. She likes spanking, so that works for her.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 08:51 PM
the best comment i've heard about this whole ordeal is a follows:
"well, at least now people will know that Brooklyn Law School actually exists."
despite the negative publicity this video fiasco is generating (with respect to BLS), it could certainly be a lot worse. think about it - at least adriana is quasi-attractive... most of the other girls attending BLS look like the mutant offspring of gary busey and jabba the hut.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 08:54 PM
8:54- Your post gets a 176.
Posted by: BLS Student (Unfortunately) | April 10, 2007 08:59 PM
nice job Lat, you brought all the worst of AutoAdmit over to ATL for a misogyny-fest. edifying as ever. thanks.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 10, 2007 10:24 PM
enjoy
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:06 AM
http://www.nakedhappygirls.com:80/videoplayer.php?video=39
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:07 AM
Greeeeeeeeeeaaat, now ATL is basically a trashcan for pornhounds to dig around looking for "sweet pr0n vids."
I'm with 10:24 on this one.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:17 AM
http://www.nakedhappygirls.com/videoplayer.php?video=39
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:35 AM
Here's a thought experiement: if she switched places with Sean Kalish and had appeared fully clothed but participating in a porn video, and he was nekkid, I'm sure the girl would still get way much more humiliation and ridicule than the guy.
Anyway, I agree qith 12:17 et al: the atmosphere in here has become a little bit smelly.
Posted by: female-type | April 11, 2007 09:04 AM
"I wanted to do something a little crazy before I graduate and do become a lawyer ... do something kind of out of character... Lawyers can be boring."
there's that pornstar lawyer in LA... She's not really out of character
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 09:07 AM
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/04/11/2007-04-11_she_wasnt_camerashy.html
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 10:20 AM
According to this, she hired a publicist:
http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_100170738.html
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 10:26 AM
Sean Kalish really blew it with that Daily News interview -- he had a chance to be loyal, mature, respectful and supportive, but instead just ends up looking like he's throwing the blame on his ex. Not classy at all.
Posted by: female-type | April 11, 2007 10:53 AM
"Sean Kalish really blew it with that Daily News interview -- he had a chance to be loyal, mature, respectful and supportive, but instead just ends up looking like he's throwing the blame on his ex. Not classy at all."
Hunh? Did you even bother to read the article? He went out of his way to praise her ("beautiful...smart...creative"), and never threw ANY blame on his ex for his part in the video.
This guy is practically a saint.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 11:07 AM
I want to shoot my own Playgirl TV spot. I'm thinking it should include me, a buffalo (preferably stuffed, for safety's sake), a bucket of ice, and a 9-iron.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 11:13 AM
Give me a break, Sean Kalish a saint? Sean Kalish is a pig and should feel the heat from this too. Way to man up in that article Sean and blame your GF for your stupid decisions as well. No wonder she dumped Sean Kalish--he's a coward.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 11:39 AM
I had a doozy of a playgirl shoot the other night. Get this: a corn-fed harvest mouse, a hooker, a nun, a Flemish peasant woman, whistle yo-yo's, and a circus midget.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 11:45 AM
Loyola 2L: After some careful thought, I believe I have discovered your calling in life. You need to go into PR. You are absolutely amazing (at least in written form) at regurgitating the same points and assertions over and over and over again, without even thinking twice about how or why you're doing it, or whether alternative arguments have merit. You also seem to have no other interests besides faux publicity and rampant narcissism. You would make a great publicist! I (and almost everyone else on this board, I think) would wholeheartedly endorse you and recommend you to a potential PR employer.
Posted by: anon | April 11, 2007 11:52 AM
11:45am and I must have been at the same shoot. But my scene involved an amputee dwarf, roman candles, a bottle of olive oil, and a guy in a spiderman costume.
It was hott.
Posted by: anonymous | April 11, 2007 11:52 AM
11:52- refer Loyola 2L to Adriana in case she ever fires her current PR person.
Posted by: BLS Prisoner | April 11, 2007 12:02 PM
New Adriana thread here:
http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/04/the_jurisdiction_stripper_adri.php
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:06 PM
11:45 - I'll say this - my shoot involved shower shoes, a cloak, a monicle, a riding crop and circus peanuts candy.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 11, 2007 12:15 PM
11:52. No I think about why I'm doing it. I do it to cope with the disappointment, regret and misery of a non top 10% tier 2 law student.
You think misery is too strong a work? Let me explain. While my friends from good schools are making $3,000 per week this summer and getting wined and dined, I will be making $15/hour copying and filing. They even put that in my job title "file clerk." While my friends from good schools are making $200,000 upon graduation and working at firms who care about their reputation and culture, I will be making $50,000 working for a small firm who couldn't give a rat's ass about how they treat their people.
While my friends are paying off $150,000 in student loan debt, I will also be paying off $150,000 in student loan debt. Funny how something that's worth so much less than their degree can cost just as much.
Finally, this isn't an ephemeral "argument." It's tangible reality. It's about a very real thing - money and jobs. You can argue all you want, but at the end of the day it's not going to get anyone a job, or help anyone cope with the life crushing misery that is tier 2 student loan debt.
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 11, 2007 12:31 PM
Loyola 2L: You are proving my point, exactly. You regurgitate the same crap over and over again, without fail. You blame professors' arbitrary grading habits for you not doing better. You blame your tier for your job plight. Your arguments have no basis in the reality that everyone else here lives and breathes in every day. I have been reading this board for a while and you have received, somewhat consistently, tangible advice, support, recommendations and information re: your job search and your employment prospects. You don't seem to take any of it seriously. You spend a good chunk of your day posting on this site, on WSJ Law Blog, probably on xoxoxo, on NY Daily News (if it means free publicity for you), or on any other future forum in which you will have a chance to vomit up your insufferable narcissism and whiny attitude. I recommend a therapist, some self-help books and a punch in a face. Get on it!
Posted by: 11:52 anon | April 11, 2007 12:44 PM
11:52 - Don't call my plight an argument. You and I are not two top school grads, earning $200,000 per year, arguing in a courtroom when we both know it doesn't matter - since we'll be fine either way.
I don't have a job. That's very real. I have debt that I can't discharge. That's very real. Half of my classmates won't have a job on graduation. That’s very real. These aren’t arguments. They’re facts.
Since you brought it up, law school essay grading is disconcertingly subjective and random. You're not even allowed to question the grades. Schools have mandatory "no regrading allowed" policies, because they know they can't justify the grades. Law classes aren't objective classes. The professors can give points for whatever reason they want. Their whimsy drives the grades. This wouldn't be a problem at top schools where most students get good jobs, but at a tier 2 law school it's very harsh.
So as you’re sitting in your cushy office, making more money than you need to “argue,” know that thousands of tier 2 law students are living miserable lives racked with awful jobs and suffocating debt, and that’s fact.
Posted by: Loyola 2L | April 11, 2007 01:04 PM
Loyola 2L - Your reality is shared by many. The jobs are few and the debt is extremely overwhelming. Incidentally, those in the top 10% are usually on scholarship, and have the least amount of debt to pay off (usually).
I hope for 11:52 that this reality is not his or hers, since it is an awful one. But I am shocked by 11:52's lack of empathy for someone in the trenches of the legal profession, who's battles are outside the hallowed walls of the white shoe firms.
I have many friends in your shoes, Loyola 2L (I myself have just stepped out of them). It is extremely frustrating to watch them flounder without any guidance from the school's career center. Trust me, there is much more wrong at Brooklyn Law School than a girl taking off her clothes online.
Posted by: BLS Alum | April 11, 2007 02:03 PM
"It is extremely frustrating to watch them flounder without any guidance from the school's career center. Trust me, there is much more wrong at Brooklyn Law School than a girl taking off her clothes online."
A current BLS student has written a series of blog entries about the career office and what a fraud they actually are.
http://emplawyernot.blogspot.com/search/label/Career-Centered
Any confirmation?
Posted by: To BLS Alum | April 11, 2007 11:25 PM
Totally agree. Now that tuitions are crossing the 40k threshold expect to hear more about these issues in the coming years. The Career Center is not the problem. The real problem is run away tuitions and debt loads.
Posted by: Agree | April 12, 2007 12:09 AM
wowsers, what a Boober. Seriously, look at the mug on that mangled muppet. I didn't know they had a law school down in Fraggle Rock.
Posted by: Anonymous | April 12, 2007 10:46 PM
This is further proof that ALL American women, esp if they are hot SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE LAWYERS.
These cunt face women will sleep their way to the top.
Posted by: Snake | May 21, 2007 12:26 PM
she is a gross person w/ no tits and a lump on her hips... i do not think she would make it too far in porn...or the law. that was just nasty.
Posted by: ew | September 23, 2007 03:45 PM
she looks like a mexican infant.
Posted by: mexican midget | September 23, 2007 03:46 PM