Add RSS RSS

Skadden Cristal Boy: An Alternate Account

Cristal Champagne Louis Roederer Abovethelaw Above the Law blog.jpgWe've received a correction of sorts to our earlier item, about a hard-partying summer associate at Skadden in New York. We have no way of verifying whether the original version or the new version of the story is correct, since neither came directly from the summer associate in question. But the latest version does come from a fellow Skadden / New York summer associate, so we're inclined to credit it.

In some ways it places the SA's conduct in a better light; in some ways, worse. Here you go:

1. Better: Contrary to the claim of "several bottles of Cristal," there was only ONE bottle of Cristal, plus "five other bottles -- standard bottle service at a club."

Update: Apparently that "one bottle" was a magnum.

2. Worse: The total tab was not a "multi-hundred dollar bill," but a grand total of $3,000.

3. Neutral: Two confirmed details from the original account: the story is from this year, not a prior year (sometimes these tales get recycled); and no permanent associates or recruiting personnel were at the event ("an after-after party").

4. Jaw-dropping: In case you were wondering: YES, the firm paid the cool three-grand bill.

Skadden takes an early lead in the "Best Summer Program" sweepstakes. Party at Four Times Square!!!

(And not just 'cause all those Vogue hotties are in the house...)

Earlier: Summer Associate of the Day: 'Skadden Cristal Boy'

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 3:45 PM

David, Did you ever tell your readers why you left biglaw? If I understand, you were an associate at WLRK once.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 3:50 PM

I knew I should've accepted at Skadden instead of Moody, Strople, Kleople, Basilone & Higginbotham Inc.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 3:54 PM

Lat's odd career journey is explained in these profiles (Legal Times, New York Times):

http://www.law.com/jsp/dc/PubArticleDC.jsp?id=1161162315435

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/22/technology/22njCOVER.html?ex=1295586000&en=ff49fd3507b48a34&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

avatar
4 Posted by Jason | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 3:55 PM

I cannot believe they paid that bill. Are they that desperate for new hires? Biglaw is a universe unto itself.

avatar
5 Posted by Jason | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 3:58 PM

I can't believe they paid that bill. Are they that desperate for new hires? Biglaw is a universe unto itself.

avatar
6 Posted by Loyola 3L | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:02 PM

I would gladly drink Old Milwaukee on the firm's dime if Skadden would hire me.

avatar
7 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:03 PM

other bottles = three grey goose, one veuve
club = lotus
coke = at least an eight-ball (from what i could see)
other people there = [redacted]

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:05 PM

Jason, you're an idiot.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:05 PM

Lotus, really? These kids must have been from out of town...

avatar
10 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:06 PM

Welcome back L2L, I mean L3L!

I want to hear David's version of why he left WLRK.

avatar
11 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:07 PM

I heard Ralbylove was there.

avatar
12 Posted by congrats! | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:09 PM

Loyola -- your last passing grade for the semester just come in? That's awesome!

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:16 PM

Doesn't anyone drink PBR anymore?

avatar
14 Posted by Velvet Jones | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 4:45 PM

When they bought the Crystal, did the bitches and n---s put away their pis-tals? Because Dirty won't be having that in this house.

avatar
15 Posted by Rutgers Gun Owner | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 5:23 PM

4:45pm - I feel victimized by your comment. Prepare to lose your job.

avatar
16 Posted by MARK KLEIN MD | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 5:31 PM

This is typical of BigLaw excess...

avatar
17 Posted by who cares? | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 5:42 PM

we did this so many times last summer. we were encouraged to go out with our fellow summers for after-after-after parties all the time. and we took car service from one club to the next. and we always got reimbursed, even if there were no associates present.

avatar
18 Posted by johnny come lately | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 6:36 PM

excuse me if i'm behind the curve here, but after reading about lat's background from the times article, i was surprised to see he wrote all those, for lack of a better word, anti-gay articles while at harvard. isn't lat gay? has he ever (1) come out or (2) explained his articles from his harvard days?

avatar
19 Posted by guest | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 6:55 PM

Why do you think Lat's gay? Just cause he's interested in fashion and the like?

avatar
20 Posted by Aged Soiled Illegitimate Child | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 8:10 PM

I repeat: Attention, 4:45. Beloved, I am currently in possession of your specie. There is no cause for you to be concerned.

avatar
21 Posted by Anon | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 8:25 PM

Even more clarification on the Skadden "cristal" night:

1. It was a magnum of Cristal.

2. An associate told a summer that associates would be arriving, but to start a tab since the summers would get there first. Needless to say, no associates arrived. That is, as far as I know, the only reason this expense was reimbursed. The summer who was stuck with the tab did not do the outrageous ordering, but, from what I'm told, did not protest, either....

avatar
22 Posted by Ralbylove | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 8:26 PM

I can neither confirm nor deny that I was there. But I do loves me some Veuve.

avatar
23 Posted by johnny come lately | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 9:00 PM

why do i think lat is gay? aside from his love of fashion and rather feminine writing style, this picture got me thinking...

http://www.queerty.com/queer/2006_01_wonkteam.jpg

but really, regardless of his sexual preference (b/c i could care less), i'm surprised someone who could easily be mistaken as gay would write columns denouncing gays.

avatar
24 Posted by anon | Permalink Friday, June 1, 2007 10:39 PM

are you guys retarded? of course lat is gay.

avatar
25 Posted by Reality | Permalink Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:45 AM

In the context of a summer program that's easily costing skadden 7-10 mil, 3K for a few drinks at a club is a rounding error.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:58 AM

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

avatar
27 Posted by anon | Permalink Saturday, June 2, 2007 1:01 AM

this is why ivy league education means shit. this kid didnt even pass the bar and hes already the worst decision maker since bush

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 2, 2007 9:40 AM

$3k to party with the B+Ts. You'd think they'd at least go somewhere worthwhile. Kids these days.

avatar
29 Posted by guest | Permalink Saturday, June 2, 2007 9:40 AM

$3k to party with the B+Ts. You'd think they'd at least go somewhere worthwhile. Kids these days.

avatar
30 Posted by enjointhis | Permalink Monday, June 4, 2007 8:47 AM

Kids these days. It's nothing unless hookers were involved. Sheesh!

avatar
31 Posted by Latin Lover | Permalink Monday, June 4, 2007 9:17 AM

If Lat is gay, we should date.

avatar
32 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 4, 2007 12:56 PM

Are you people for real about Lat's sexual orientation? OF COURSE he's gay! In addition to the gay comments he makes on his blog, go to his Friendster profile. First, it has a picture of Lat shirtless, which is a telltale sign of a homo. Second, most of his male Friendster friends are gay (look at their profiles, which say that they're seeking relationships with men). He is unquestionably gay.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 4, 2007 1:02 PM

The NYT article about Lat doesn't make it seem like the articles Lat wrote about gays were homophobic. They appear to just reflect a very conservative worldview, which is not inconsistent with being gay.

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, June 4, 2007 2:04 PM

6/1 9pm: Think Ted Haggard.

avatar
35 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, June 5, 2007 10:16 PM

The club was not Lotus but Libation. Most other information, such as bottles ordered, is largely correct. The total is in the right ballpark -- I guess what matters is that it was a lot of money that Skadden agreed to reimburse. Not all of the summers partook of this wild evening but details have certainly made the rounds among the summer class in gossip.

avatar
36 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, June 7, 2007 9:56 PM

Kirkland Chicago would never have paid for this. They have a $50/associate limit on lunches (including tax, tip, and cabfare), and summers have been told to not expect to expense any drinking that happens associate-free.

avatar
37 Posted by anon | Permalink Thursday, June 7, 2007 9:59 PM

$50 per summer associate, that is.

Post Your Comment