Legal Eagle Wedding Watch: June's Couple of the Month
This should delight some of our commenters: With 36.7 percent of the vote, Avery Gardiner and Edwin U are the winners of our Couple of the Month contest for June!
It was a close race, but in the end Avery and Edwin held off a strong challenge by Serena Hoy and James Reilly.
Congratulations to the happy couple!
Earlier: Legal Eagle Wedding Watch: Couple of the Month for June
Comments
wgwag
Posted by: wgwag | July 18, 2007 02:17 PM
Gotta love that.
Posted by: Irony | July 18, 2007 02:18 PM
How is this ironic?
Posted by: anon | July 18, 2007 02:22 PM
GO WGWAG!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 02:22 PM
*cracks up*
somehow, i knew what the "some of our commenters" links would be once i saw the picture.
but i clicked anyway.
Posted by: xo is apparently taking over the world | July 18, 2007 02:27 PM
White Girls With Asian Guys.
Posted by: The Real WGWAG | July 18, 2007 02:34 PM
This is what happens when you don't restrict IP addresses to one vote apiece.
Posted by: NYU5L | July 18, 2007 02:35 PM
Go WGWAG, its your birfday.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 02:43 PM
WGWAG:
Weil Gotshals' With Ass Germs?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 02:53 PM
okay, WGWAG is juvenile, but I had to crack up when this pic was posted. All I can think is WGWAG!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 05:02 PM
It's awesome that his last name is U.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 05:04 PM
I'm sure there was a WGWAG "bump" on the vote, but wasn't there also discussion in the thread that this particular couple made sense because they were actually both lawyers?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 05:12 PM
To 5:12
WGWAG
Posted by: WGWAG! | July 18, 2007 05:43 PM
But shouldn't the second place couple (Serena Hoy + James Reilly) have gotten WGWAG points too?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 05:48 PM
WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG WGWAG
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 06:11 PM
5:48 - No. WGWAG must be strictly construed as denoting white girls with Asian guys.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 06:13 PM
I reject strict constructionism. I support an evolving conception of WGWAG.
As Justice Kennedy wrote in Lawrence v. Texas:
"As [WGWAG] endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for [WGWAG]-dom."
White Guys With Asian Girls = WGWAG!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 06:19 PM
6:13 : And more importantly, WGWAG must be strictly construed as involving ASIANS.
Posted by: Idiots! | July 18, 2007 06:36 PM
THE WGWAG
THE WHOLE WGWAG
AND NOTHING BUT THE WGWAG
SO HELP US GOD!
ALL YOUR WHITE GIRLS ARE BELONG TO US!
Posted by: aznaznazn | July 18, 2007 09:46 PM
WGWAG WGWAG WHITE GIRLS WITH ASIAN GUYS WGWAGWGWAG
WHITE GIRLS WITH ASIAN GUYS WGWAG
Posted by: white girls, asian guys, together | July 18, 2007 09:51 PM
DAVID LAT I LOVE YOU, WHITE GIRLS WITH ASIAN GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!! WGWAG WGWAG. BEST legal blog EVER!~~~~~
Posted by: maolo wgwag | July 18, 2007 10:00 PM
All time posts WGWAG look same. Today same same but different.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 19, 2007 01:20 AM
Congrats, WGWAG
And thanks, Laurie, for the hall-of-fame links. I had missed one of them.
Posted by: 10803 | July 19, 2007 10:24 AM