Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: What's Up With Baker & McKenzie?
Over in the D.C. office of Baker & McKenzie, the natives are getting restless. They've prepared this cute little bar graph (thumbnail image; click to enlarge):
The graphic above also reflects that Williams & Connolly now pays starting salaries of $165,000. We hadn't heard (or written) about that news, but it's official.
Does anyone have a memo and/or more information about what Williams & Connolly pays beyond the first year? If so, please email us. Thanks.
Update / Correction: Whoops, we forgot that W&C raised salaries back in March. What we were thinking, and meant to write, is that Williams & Connolly hasn't raised associate salaries in response to the latest round of nationwide pay hikes (as kicked off by Orrick).
Remember that W&C traditionally doesn't pay year-end bonuses, but pays an above-market base to make up for it. Their current scale -- 165, 180, 195, etc. -- is still above-market, but not by as much as usual.
Further Update / Correction: Apparently Greenberg Traurig is still at $145K in Washington. We've revised the graph accordingly.
Earlier: Nationwide Pay Raise Watch: What's Up With Williams & Connolly?












Comments
ah.... ah..... ah....... FIRST!!
Posted by: anon | July 17, 2007 03:53 PM
NY to $190!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:54 PM
White Girls With Asian Guys
Posted by: WGWAG | July 17, 2007 03:55 PM
Now if only somebody would do the same in Chicago...
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:57 PM
Williams & Connolly cementing its dominance over Covington.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:57 PM
If you ever needed clear evidence that biglaw practice is little more than a d**k-measuring contest, here it is.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:57 PM
White guys leaving Asian girls with limps and smiles because lil Asian rice dicks can't satisfy them.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:57 PM
WTF Lat - your earlier post on Williams & connolly mentioned the $165. Do you not re-read/remember your own posts before making a statement like this?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 03:59 PM
WTF Lat - your earlier post on Williams & connolly mentioned the $165. Do you not re-read/remember your own posts before making a statement like this?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:00 PM
Williams & Connolly has been at 165 since the nationwide bump to 145 awhile back. 165 is actually well below market insofar as they do not pay year-end bonuses.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:03 PM
Associates at Baker deserve to make less because they can't make a point without making it red, bold, and with a double label.
Posted by: Understatement wins | July 17, 2007 04:06 PM
oh the poor babies! they are so underpaid for their monkey work
Posted by: anon | July 17, 2007 04:07 PM
Baker has issued a memo and will be raising to market on Aug. 1
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:08 PM
4:08 is wrong, they are raising to 170 in DC (they want to leave W&C behind).
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:13 PM
Why do I get a feeling that all of this pay raises is just a race to the top and there's going to be a crash?
Posted by: Gelimer | July 17, 2007 04:17 PM
yeah, right, and they're raising to 200 in NY on Oct.1
Posted by: WGWAG | July 17, 2007 04:18 PM
Simpson Thacher to one HUNDRED dollars!
Posted by: Dr. Evil | July 17, 2007 04:23 PM
You can take Fulbright & Jaworski's D.C. office off the list of shame. They raised last week, effective July 1, as follows:
Class / Base / 1900 / 2150 / 2300 / 2500 / total
'06 / $160,000 / none / none / none / none / $160,000
'05 / $165,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $5,000 / $185,000
'04 / $170,000 / $15,000 / $7,500 / $12,500 / $12,500 / $217,500
'03 / $185,000 / $25,000 / $10,000 / $12,500 / $12,500 / $245,000
'02 / $200,000 / $30,000 / $12,500 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $277,500
'01 / $210,000 / $35,000 / $12,500 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $292,500
'00 / $220,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $17,500 / $17,500 / $310,000
'99 / $230,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $330,000
'98 / $240,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $340,000
'97 / $245,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $345,000
'96 / $250,000 / $40,000 / $15,000 / $22,500 / $22,500 / $350,000
Up to 150 pro bono and other qualifying hours count towards the 2150, 2300, and 2500 hour bonuses.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:25 PM
Funny how those who made the graph left off one of B&M's biggest global competitors: DLA Piper. They also one-up B&M by paying $160k all over the place (not just NY and DC).
Posted by: anon | July 17, 2007 04:26 PM
Know pretty much for a fact that my V25 (NY office) is raising to $175K come September.
Posted by: YYAAALLLL | July 17, 2007 04:27 PM
any word on Fulbright's other offices?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:28 PM
any memo for the fulbright raise?? This would be huge for the two other Texas firms in DC (Baker Botts and V&E).
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:31 PM
I call BS on 4:27.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:34 PM
4:13 --- show us the goods.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:35 PM
where's hunton at?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:36 PM
No memo on Fulbright, nor are we expecting one - all the info was handed down orally at a meeting of all the associates last week.
No word on their other offices either.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:39 PM
Lat -- WTF..???
W&C raised back in March
http://www.abovethelaw.com/2007/03/skaddenfreude_williams_connoll.php
W&C is currently below market when bonuses are factored in. They have not responded to the latest raises to $160
Posted by: anon | July 17, 2007 04:40 PM
I love that the graph starts at 135K and has 5K increments. It makes the disparity look HUGE!
NY to 190K!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:41 PM
4:34 -I have no reason to BS. Its def going to be $175K for first years, the only thing I am unsure of is when. September may be off. Not sure how the rest of the scale is going to be which sucks since I am not a first year.
Posted by: YYAAALLL | July 17, 2007 04:41 PM
Lat -
Try to confirm the Fulbright raise. Obviously, it's important to your ATL readers in Unhappy, Texas.
Posted by: I.J. Reilly | July 17, 2007 04:43 PM
while you're talking about these huge salaries, look at this craigslist post i came across. unbelievable.
Small regional litigation firm seeks full time attorney admitted to practice in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
We are looking for an attorney with 0-3 years experience that will prepare discovery requests and discovery responses, perform research and writing, create and meet deadlines, draft pleadings and motions, attend depositions and arbitrations. Court appearances will be in both New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Please submit resume with telephone number, law school transcript and writing sample (minimum 5 pages, maximum 10 pages).
Location: Cherry Hill
Compensation: $35,000 - $40,000
Principals only. Recruiters, please don't contact this job poster.
Please, no phone calls about this job!
Please do not contact job poster about other services, products or commercial interests.
http://southjersey.craigslist.org/lgl/375821807.html
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:56 PM
Lat-
Although you are (by your own account) way behind on W&C salary info, you may not have heard something else: there is a rumor going round that W&C bumped its clerkship bonus from $25k to $35k.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 04:58 PM
Since when is Cravath a "D.C. firm"
Posted by: Anon | July 17, 2007 05:03 PM
4:56, "small regional litigation firm" translates to "captive insurance defense counsel/drone for huge insurance company."
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:04 PM
White Girls With Asian Girls
Posted by: WGWAG | July 17, 2007 05:05 PM
remember, W&C never ever pays any bonus (and their associates routinely bill over 2400 hours), so all things considered remains below market
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:08 PM
Yummmm . . . that is the WGWAG I like
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:10 PM
3:59, 4:40 - See the update/correction just added.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:22 PM
TB SHEETS!
Posted by: Van Morrison | July 17, 2007 05:25 PM
Hey, if my firm had partnership prospects for associates like W&C then I'd work for no bonus too. The bonus would come in the form of a seven-figure partnership paycheck.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:31 PM
Since when does Irell have an office in DC?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:37 PM
Atlanta to $145k.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 05:55 PM
TALLAHASSEE TO $60K!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 06:06 PM
The chart's author must've been crunched for space at the end of the chard, because it leaves off Wilmer Hale and Wiley Rein, two firms with big DC presence.
NY to $190K!!!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 06:18 PM
Lat - Please put your ear to the rail and figure out if there will be movement in NYC anytime soon. I have to decide on NYC before my clerkship term is up.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 06:33 PM
First!
Posted by: slowpoke | July 17, 2007 07:30 PM
Lat, is there any truth to the Fulbright rumor in DC? What about their other offices? Especially Texas?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 07:32 PM
GREENBERG TRAURG'S DC OFFICE SALARY IS 145k, NOT 160k. PLEASE ADD TO LIST WITH BAKER.
Posted by: anon | July 17, 2007 09:43 PM
Why is a firm like Greenberg still at $145k in DC?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 09:59 PM
The Fulbright may be indeed be true. The partner in charge of our compensation committee admitted as much this evening in front of four associates.
Someone joked about Electrical Engineers getting a bump over everyone else. He said it sent shockwaves through the IP partners.
He said that raises "likely are not done for the year" and that things are "very fluid."
He made some half-hearted assertion about being careful of getting what you want, but given that most people had worked through the weekend and to get the work done that was lost.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 10:28 PM
NY to $190!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 10:33 PM
NY to $190!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 17, 2007 11:03 PM
Ask a firm like Greenberg that question. I'm sure it does wonders for their recruitment.
Posted by: anon | July 18, 2007 12:06 AM
Ask a firm like Greenberg that question. I'm sure it does wonders for their recruitment.
Posted by: jetsettinglawyer | July 18, 2007 12:06 AM
NY to $190!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 12:08 AM
When you take a step back and think about it, you realize that $160,000 a year is a fucking unbelievable amount of money.
Posted by: Richie Cunningham | July 18, 2007 07:58 AM
Where the hell is Bingham McCutchen on there? Don't they have a pretty sizable DC office?
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 08:00 AM
Other firms with sizable DC offices left off the list:
Sidley Austin
Posted by: Anon | July 18, 2007 09:29 AM
Quinn DC? Yeah right. Remind me not to send referrals to Baker.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 09:40 AM
Goodwin Procter is also at 160 in DC with a pretty sizable DC office
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 09:49 AM
how exactly does a "DC firm" like Cravath or QE make a chart but a DC powerhouse like Wilmer, Cutler is missing?
[They are, I believe, at 145k.]
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 10:41 AM
Isn't Venable still at 145? They're a rather large DC firm.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 10:43 AM
Isn't Venable still at 145? They're a rather large DC firm.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 10:45 AM
I think the only office of Greenberg Traurig at $160k is NY. None of their other offices have announced raises.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 10:59 AM
seyfarth shaw's dc office (and all others except NYC) are also at 145k.
Posted by: anon | July 18, 2007 11:07 AM
According to NALP, Nixon Peabody's 107-lawyer office in DC is also at $145 (it appears only the NYC office is at $160).
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 11:41 AM
If you have the time to make a f'n bar graph of all top DC firms compensation, don't you think its time to get another job?
Posted by: move on | July 18, 2007 01:13 PM
Actually their graph is short Townsend at 160. They just opened up a D.C. office.
Posted by: Anonymous | July 18, 2007 02:44 PM
Even if not paying 160k in other locales, Greenberg appears to be at market in those other offices. Except DC. Where is Wilmer on that chart?!
Posted by: Anonymous | July 19, 2007 08:02 AM