Add RSS RSS

Fall Recruiting Open Thread: Vault 71-75

Oh! Whooo! Aye. Yeah, yeah, yeaaah! Oh! Hey! Ooh, ooh, yeah!

We press on with our open threads on Vault 100 law firms. Sure, these next five firms are ranked by their Vault prestige scores (indicated parenthetically). But in our opinion, every one of them is a winner:

71. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP (5.358)
72. Chadbourne & Parke LLP (5.239)
73. Hunton & Williams LLP (5.230)
74. Nixon Peabody LLP (5.153)
75. Thacher Proffitt & Wood LLP (5.137)

Please discuss them in the comments. Thanks!

The Vault Top 100 Law Firms [Vault]

Earlier: Vault 1-5; Vault 6-10; Vault 11-15; Vault 16-20; Vault 21-25; Vault 26-30; Vault 31-35; Vault 36-40; Vault 41-45; Vault 46-50; Vault 51-55; Vault 56-60; Vault 61-65; Vault 66-70

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by first? | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:05 PM

first for the first time ever!

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:05 PM

AUTHOR:
EMAIL:
IP: 208.210.219.131
URL:
DATE: 08/28/2007 01:05:17 PM

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:05 PM

Anyone have an opinion whether Kirkpatrick & Lockhart move up on this list next year as a result of the merger?

avatar
4 Posted by first? (post #2) | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:08 PM

Looks like I was the winner of the "first" game.... See, it IS possible to be a winner if you don't work at Nixon!

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:11 PM

I had a friend who summered at Thatcher Proffitt and loved it (he did real estate). He was really looking forward to starting this fall.

avatar
6 Posted by Question | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:15 PM

Can anybody tell me anything about Nixon Peabody LLP? I've heard of the other firms on this list, but not that one. Did anyone summer there?

avatar
7 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:17 PM

Which of these five firms are on the list of shame for 160 in the major markets?

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:19 PM

Nixon is still list of shame for DC. Hunton raised.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:22 PM

Thacher sells commodity CMBS work. Are they still paying bucket salaries to mids and seniors and rolling with hours based boni?

avatar
10 Posted by Elitist Pig | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:24 PM

Ah, 1:15, if you will but give me four minutes of your time I can tell you all you need to know about Nixon Peabody . . . better yet, I can SING you all you need to know . . . (cue music).

avatar
11 Posted by Best place to work | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:30 PM

Fortune Magazine named Nixon Peabody one fo the best places to work in the entire country a while back! It didn't really create much buzz in the law firm community but they certainly pimp that fact in their recruiting materials.

avatar
12 Posted by Casey Kasem | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:31 PM

Nixon Peabody: #73 on the Vault 100, but #4 (and rising!) on this weeks' American Top 40.

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:34 PM

1:30. Really? I hadn't heard. They should create a song or something.

avatar
14 Posted by The Folks at Fortune Magazine Agree | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:36 PM

Everyone's a winner at Nixon Peabody.

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:38 PM

Is everyone a winner at Kirkpatrick & Lockhart?

avatar
16 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:40 PM

Hunton = sweatshop who believes itself to be elite but is in fact a victim of their own snobbery...

avatar
17 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:42 PM

Is there a national buzz about Hunton? I know they are one of the big/only two along with MW in Richmond, but what does that mean for the region or nation? Beside the number on the Vault 100 is there any reason to choose HW over MW if one would be staying in Richmond.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:42 PM

I summered at Hunton in Richmond... ummmm, very recently... and it was a miserable place to work. 75% of the associates I interacted with were pretty transparently unhappy, and the other 25% were from shitty southern law schools like Univ. of Richmond, so they still felt lucky just to be working.

Overall, I'd suggest to any 1Ls out there that if they want to summer at Hunton, (1) stick to DC or NY and/or (2) definitely split your summer. A lot of my fellow summers spent the whole summer there, so even though they didn't like it, they feel like they have no choice. As for me, I'm going elsewhere, for sure.

avatar
19 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:43 PM

K&L Gates has still not raised in Texas. Not a market leader and a poor follower which makes for poorer associates. Might as well move to ATL.

avatar
20 Posted by integritayhay | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:47 PM

Is Nixon Peabody going to be the butt of jokes forever? I hope so.

avatar
21 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:50 PM

To Anon at 1:43:

Why do you think the DC or NY offices are better places to work?

avatar
22 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:50 PM

Can anyone tell me if it is all about integrity at any of these firms?

avatar
23 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:51 PM

Anyone know anything about Hunton in TX?

avatar
24 Posted by I want to be a winner | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:52 PM

How can NP be full of winners if they're only ranked 74?

avatar
25 Posted by 1:42 | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:54 PM

To 1:50 -- The summers I met from Hunton's DC and NY offices seemed to be having a better (or at least, more professional) experience overall. They were working hard, but seemed to still like the firm and take their work very seriously. NOT so in Richmond.

Plus, Richmond has traditionally been the main office, but that's changing. NY and DC are where I got the sense the firm is focusing.

I wasn't in love with Richmond as a city (though Hunton tried REALLY hard to push how great it is), but if I wanted to stay there, I'd go to work for MW.

avatar
26 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:54 PM

Good point 1:52. As far as I'm concerned, they're just the 73rd loser.

avatar
27 Posted by Huntin' and Gruntin' | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:56 PM

Hunton...Ah yes. Ok, this is impressionistic (although I have worked with Hunton lawyers and, eh) but fwiw... I went to UVa and those bastards from Richmond strut around Virginia (and the grounds of the Virginia School of Law) like they own the place. Funny thing is McGuire seems happy to be the gentlemen lawyers of richmond, but Hunton thinks they are the big-city hotshot lawyers BSD truly big league the SHIT. Yeah... Whatever. Not everyone is a winner at H&W, imho. Arrogant f*cks.

avatar
28 Posted by Fair Use? What's That? | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 1:58 PM

I've heard that Nixon's IP lawyers are trigger-happy idiots. I saw something to that effect on a blog somewhere.

avatar
29 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:04 PM

Interviewed with HW a while back. Not impressed at all. 1:42's comments seem pretty spot-on

avatar
30 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:07 PM

Main reason to choose Hunton over MW is money. MW pays individual salaries on the way up, and the are, at least currently falling short of the averages at Hunton.

MW has nicer lawyers as people, but the firm is in a big transition stage and depending on what practice group you work in it can be just as bad as Hunton. Hunton actually got a few lawyers from MW this year so far ...

Here's my advice. If you want a lot of money without sacrificing your whole life ... win the lottery.

avatar
31 Posted by Record Co. executive | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:08 PM

The Nixon Peabody song has legs.

Seriously, it’s a bullet.

All it needs is some airplay on an 80” rock station.

avatar
32 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:10 PM

Hunton on NY is a joke. They think they are big shit because they used to dominate the Richmond market--if that is even a market!--and that arrogance has carried over to NY. They try to recruit only at the top schools because that's what Richmond does with the Southern schools. Meanwhile, their bonus structure has been a mess for years and they regularly pay under market. The partners in NY are petty and the internal politics are ridiculous. A miserable firm all around.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:11 PM

2:07, how is MW in a big transition stage? I know they appointed a new chairman and a new managing partner, but is that what you are referencing? Just wondering

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:17 PM

If you want to work in Richmond you're better off going to one of the boutique firms like LeClair Ryan. Hunton and MW consider themselves the Richmond elite -- reality is is they are just regional firms that employ mostly UVA/W&M/ and U of R grads. Why work there unless you have ties to the area? Its really not that nice of a place to live . . . traffic heading North to DC sucks and there is nothing South until you hit Orlando.

avatar
35 Posted by Stefan Gucci | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:24 PM

I am prepared to offer Nixon Peabody a record contract for two million dollars!

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:26 PM

The billables at MW and HW are the same as those at LeClair or any of the other "boutique" firms. So if you are going to live in Richmond why not just work at the "elite" even if they are just regional firms? Moreover, in what field is LeClair a boutique? I don't know anything about them.

avatar
37 Posted by 10803 | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:26 PM

WTF is "Richmond"? Is that where those poor fellas got stuck in Deliverance?

avatar
38 Posted by L2L could be a winner at NP!!! | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:27 PM

L2L, normally I would say that these firms are still ranked too high to consider you, but IMHO I would guess that NP may have trouble recruiting at the moment. Send in your resume before this blows over!!!

avatar
39 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:27 PM

2:24 - Would that be a 90/10 split?

avatar
40 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:29 PM

2:17 - LeClair Ryan is only a great firm if you do litigation. They pay significantly under market. Don't be fooled by what they post as starting salary; the number they quote includes everything from bar expenses, to health insurance, to parking. So in reality, starting salary is about $25 less than advertised. Also, your bonus is tied to what is collected off of your time, not just what you bill. So if you do work for a dead-beat client and they don't pay, you get no bonus.

avatar
41 Posted by Anonymous 2L | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:30 PM

Can someone tell me about K&L Gates in Pittsburgh?

avatar
42 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:38 PM

Contrary to what someone said above, splitting your 2L summer can be a bad idea -- you might end up hurting your chances at an offer from either firm. Just a thought.

avatar
43 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:39 PM

I don't wand to argue semantics. but by "boutique" I mean they primarily focus on Labor and Employment. Point is that LeClair and most of the other medium Richmond firms are competitive in the salary/bonus market and in my opinion offer a better lifestyle in that they don't have a bunch of dickwad partners and associates with degrees from regional schools who act like they are ivy league educated. A UVA student is considered a big catch to both firms. Billables are the same in most of the medium to large firms in Richmond but regardless you can't put a price on working with people who are somewhat grounded. MW and Hunton suck . . . if your going to live in Richmond at least be happy where you work. If it's money your after, Richmond is not the place to be. If you went to a regional school other than UVA and want $$ go to Northern VA or DC.

avatar
44 Posted by Elitist Pig | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:46 PM

1:52 - NP is full of winners in the same way a special ed class is full of winners.

Can't . . . get . . . out of . . . my head: "everyone's a winner at NIX-ON PEA-BO-DY" . . . CURSE YOU INFERIOR FIRMS!!!

avatar
45 Posted by splitting | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:49 PM

I strongly disagree with the idea that splitting your 2L summer can be a bad idea. I suppose that would be true if you blow off one of the firms or don't take an offer from a place you really like because it doesn't allow you to split, but people split their summers all the time. Firms understand how this works and don't take it personally or hold it against summer associates when it comes time to make offers -- unless the firm is full of people who didn't have many job opportunities themselves.

avatar
46 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:50 PM

I see where you are going with the LeClair and lifestyle. Thanks for the clarification.

avatar
47 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:07 PM

Wow, I can't tell if all the H&W hate is coming from one disgruntled summer or not, but it sure sounds like it.

Like any firm, your personal experience at H&W will depend on the handful of individuals you happen to work with. I'm sure some practice groups offer a more pleasant experience than others. And let's be real, you can find unhappy associates and arrogant prick associates/partners at any firm in town.

That said, there are really just two tiers of law firms in Richmond -- H&W & MW, and then everyone else. Of the two (H&W and MW), I'd say MW is more of a sweatshop. At least based on my observations and anecdotal evidence from other attorneys in town. LeClair is 100% eat what you kill (great if you are highly entreprenurial; not so great otherwise). Troutman (formerly Mays Valentine in Richmond) is still trying to find its local identity and cope with Atlanta oversight. Williams Mullen is a good mid-sized firm, but like LeClair, I think they are handicapped by the fact that many of their clients are small corporations and individuals, which translates into lower billable rates and lower associate comp.

As a place to live and raise a family, Richmond is hard to beat. Of course, if you are more drawn to the bright lights of the big city, then you'd find Richmond pretty boring. But if you like low crime, easy commutes, good schools and outdoor activities, then the city has a lot to offer.

And no, I'm not on the recruiting committee. Just trying to talk some summers in off the ledge.

avatar
48 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:08 PM

Arent there alternatives to Hunton (and Gruntin) in Richmond like Troutman or Williams Mullen?

I cant speak personally but I would check those out after MW and HW in Richmond. LeClair Ryan is a souped up insurance defense firm doing med mal, etc. I give them credit for trying to change that, but their pay is low and the hours arent much better. The only good mid-sized firm I've heard good things about re: QOL is Hirschler Fleischer (sp?).

avatar
49 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:08 PM

Nixon Peabody has a horrible reputation in Boston. Lack of proper trianing and unhappy associates.

avatar
50 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:10 PM

Richmond is the 5th most dangerous city in the US.

avatar
51 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:13 PM

Can anybody tell me about Chadbourne? I know they had a bad year in 2005 and fell from the 50's in rankings down to the 70's. They have done some restructuring and turned around their profits. Is the restructuring done? Are they on the way back up, or are things still a little volatile there?

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:18 PM

Splitting your 2L summer can definitely be a bad thing. First, you have a much greater chance of missing out on interesting things that happen to run into the second (or start in the first) half of summer. Second, and more importantly, you spend the first four or so weeks of a job getting comfortable and meeting the people you're working with, and at that point it's almost time to leave. The last thing most people want to do at that point is go start over again with a new round of awkward introductions to co-workers. Most of the people I know who split their summer ended up having a miserable time in the second half.

avatar
53 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:19 PM

Can anybody tell me about Chadbourne? I know they had a bad year in 2005 and fell from the 50's in rankings down to the 70's. They have done some restructuring and turned around their profits. Is the restructuring done? Are they on the way back up, or are things still a little volatile there?

avatar
54 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:26 PM

Just got a call-back from Chadbourne, but know nothing about it. Thoughts?

avatar
55 Posted by Thacher Associate | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:38 PM

You will have a life outside of Thacher if you work at Thacher. The people are the nicest in New York. AND, you will be paid very well.

That said, you will do a shit load of securitization work.

avatar
56 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:42 PM

I agree with 3:38. The thing that should be of concern is how much this crunch in the credit market will affect TPW. They were making a lot of money off of these mortgage backed securities issuances.

avatar
57 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:46 PM

I agree completely with 3:07. I used to work with Hunton-Richmond (left for spouse's job) and really liked it. At least in my group, the people were great and very competent. There are certain teams that get crushed with NYC-like hours, but most associates have a good life. Summer associates would be wise to rotate through several groups to figure out which groups have it better. The bonus structure is definitely nothing to write home about, but there is a big cost of living savings and no one else in Richmond is offering any better.... My general impression is that those who complained about the hours expected not to work hard because it's Richmond. The reality is that, regardless of location, large firms are large firms and associates have to work a lot.

As far as Richmond firm hierarchy goes, Hunton is the most elite and the closest thing there is to an international firm (and it is true as some commentators noted that the firm is dominated by UVA law, but do they are quite willing to hire law review/coif out of Univ of Richmond). McGuire Woods is next, followed by Troutman and WilliamsMullen. MW has a good practice, especially in commercial litigation, and they have some impressive political connections. But H&W wins in transactional/corporate work.

Troutman used to be a local shop and now reports to Atlanta. I heard Atlanta demoted some former equity partners in Richmond, which created some tension, but maybe things have smoothed out a bit with time. WilliamsMullen is best described as the firm that services local businesses. I know people there who weren't very happy. They place a lot of emphasis on client development at a young age (like, day 1).

To be blunt, I think a summer would be an idiot to go to Richmond but turn down offers from HW and MW.

I can't say much about LeClair Ryan, but it's definitely NOT on level with the four firms above.

Richmond is fine. It depends on what you're looking for.... If you like DC and NYC, you won't like Richmond.

avatar
58 Posted by 1:42 | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:50 PM

I suggested splitting just to keep options open... to be entirely honest though, I did not split my time at Hunton, but without saying too much, I have an open offer from my 1L summer firm so I wasn't in the same boat as others. I can't say how Hunton feels about splitting... but I know some summers did it and got offers.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:08 PM

3:10-- Richmond crime is generally isolated to a very few (and very identifiable) areas of town. Not parts of town an attorney would find him- or herself.

avatar
60 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:09 PM

I interviewed at Chadbourne DC a while ago. Since that time, a big chunk (maybe all) of the white collar group jumped ship for McDermott Will (Abbe Lowell, who represented Jack Abramoff, among others, headed up the group). I seem to recall that the only other stuff going on there was arbitration between insurers and reinsurers. Nice enough people, if a bit stuffy.

avatar
61 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:22 PM

1:54, that would make a great "No Fear" shirt!

avatar
62 Posted by Criminy | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:22 PM

WTF do you whiny sniveling little bastards want from your law degree? You want to make top of the market pay, yet don't want to work too hard and want to be surrounded by lawyers and staff who blow smoke up your ass all day and sing sweet nothings. Oh, and a state of the art office, free cell phone and blackberry, and the most wonderful breakfast buffet spread (free of course) laid out in the lobby each morning.

Pay me $160,000. Accept the fact that I will be 1,700 "true hours." Give me a big fat bonus for my "commitment." And be adaptive when I walk in your office and say I want to stay on the partnership track and my spouse and I are committed to having 2.5 perfect children by the age 33 and to be living in that exclusive gated community on the north end of town and to get to every single one of little Joey's soccer games and to have our picture taken working on a Habitat for Humanty worksite on a Saturday morning before we jet off for 10 day family vacation on Captiva.

avatar
63 Posted by MW Alumnus | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:23 PM

I am now at Hunton after spending a few years at MW. I definitely see Hunton as a step up. Not only is the compensation better, you won't get nickled and dimed. Simple things like paying for CLE workshops, issuing a blackberry, year round business casual, etc will be found at Hunton. You can have those things at MW (except for the business casual) but you'll have to pay for it yourself. MW is a solid firm but Hunton is a step above.

avatar
64 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:24 PM

Bottom line is Richmond is a small city. There are large corporations that generate plenty of work for HW and MW. Outside of that with a small city you get small city politics generally controlled by a "good ole boy" network of finance, politic, and lawyer types. I don't want to patronize anyone but again, unless one has ties to the area there is nothing there. You are not going to break into the powerful homegrown circles that exist in Richmond. I can think of not earthly idea why a lawyer would want to work in Richmond unless:

1. You are from Richmond or went to lawschool in the area, or

2. You can't find a job anywhere else

You will be a small fish in a small pond. If you went to a school thats ranked higher than UVA, people will just assume you fall into group 2.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:25 PM

Anybody have any dirt on K&L Gates' Seattle office? Any info is appreciated.

avatar
66 Posted by P-town Politico | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:29 PM

How does Hunton stack up among the Norfolk firms? I heard Vandeventer dominates that market. I have an offer from Hunton but can't get an interview with Vandeventer. What should I do?

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:33 PM

Thacher and Cadwalader may in deep sh!t over this MBS fallout.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:35 PM

Admittedly, I am trolling just to what is said about Hunton, but am confused in that the discussion on Hunton is focused around Richmond, which is of course where the firm started, but there about 800 attorneys in Hunton outside of Richmond and the firm is moving to a national designation from my understanding.

Any info on the Dallas, Miami or Atlanta offices?

avatar
69 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:37 PM

4:29: I think Hunton's Norfolk office does a lot of maritime work. The office is a remnant of the old Hunton (smaller, Virginia firm) and is not a powerhouse in Norfolk like Kaufman & Canoles. That being said, you'll be part of a very large firm with concomitant benefits, and it couldn't hurt your resume.

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:38 PM

4:23 Good insight, but I bet you went to either UVA, Richmond or William & Mary. Probably William & Mary. I can profile HW folks all day. Probably in their tax group if you lat moved there from MW. Good luck.

avatar
71 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:42 PM

Admittedly, I am trolling just to what is said about Hunton, but am confused in that the discussion on Hunton is focused around Richmond, which is of course where the firm started, but there about 800 attorneys in Hunton outside of Richmond and the firm is moving to a national designation from my understanding.

Any info on the Dallas, Miami or Atlanta offices?

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:42 PM

1:22, Thacher's bonus is based on hitting a target billable amount - 2100 hours.

avatar
73 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:44 PM

I hate nothing more than the "b/c you didn't get an offer" responses to criticism, but let's not completely dismiss the fact that the above disgruntled summer associate post came exactly one week after offers and rejections were communicated.

As with the poster above and, in full disclosure, I recently worked for Hunton and enjoyed my experience there as well. To advise anyone to not look there or entertain an offer from Hunton is very poor advice- particularly if you want to work in Richmond. I imagine even Hunton's local competitors will agree.

As for the general Richmond bashing, don't be silly- it is what it is. If you apply to work in Richmond, you're looking for a certain sized city and you've chosen it (i.e., you've already cleared the big city hurdle and chosen a smaller city). It's actually a very nice city, great to raise a family in, solid COL given the very good salaries offered by TS, HW and MW, etc. Heck, you can make top dollar working at a national firm in a medium city- if you have a family, it's a no brainer.

Oh, except for the summer associate that is wise beyond his years.....

avatar
74 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:48 PM

4:35: Good point. Richmond is by far their largest office and probably still comes across as the HQ.

The Miami office is very strong. They do a lot of Latin America business transactions. The firm's new managing partner came out of the Miami office, which should diminish Richmond's influence.

The Texas offices just absorbed most of the Jenkins & Gilcrist (sp?) lawyers. Not sure how that'll play out, but it added a lot of attorneys.

Atlanta strikes me as fine, but it's not Alston or King.

avatar
75 Posted by Anony | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:50 PM

"I can think of not earthly idea why a lawyer would want to work in Richmond unless:

1. You are from Richmond or went to lawschool in the area, or

2. You can't find a job anywhere else"


Posts like these crap me up, if for no other reason, than their ignorance. Gee, Anon, if you can't think of a reason, it must not exist. COL? QOL outside of the firm? Family life? National work in a local market? etc. Perhaps some people actually like cities you don't, or even dislike cities you like. The nerve!

avatar
76 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:53 PM

Following up re Chadbourne: I work in the DC office (doing the "arbitration between insurers and reinsurers") and have found it be a good place to work. I don't know about the "stuffy" factor in the other groups or offices, but my group is fairly relaxed and friendly, especially at the associate level. All the usual big-firm perks apply, plus you get the advantages of working in a smaller office. My one caveat is that the office is very practice-group-oriented, so I tell recruits to make sure you like the people in your group because that's who you will be seeing 95% of the time.

avatar
77 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:53 PM

4:50 -- you must work at MW and are pissed you can't get a job at Hunton. Or you went to Regent and are the new Bieber and Associates associate. I can understand why COL is important for you when your on a 50/50 split in the DUI market.

avatar
78 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:56 PM

"crap me up"?? How old are you? 12 or 82?

avatar
79 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:57 PM

is HUNTON a good place to work for?

avatar
80 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:58 PM

NO

avatar
81 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:59 PM

YES

avatar
82 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:59 PM

MAYBE

avatar
83 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:00 PM

I summered at Hunton in Richmond and loved it there (and, no, I didn't attend a Va. law school). Not sure about the "unhappiness" figures cited by the summer associate above, not my experience at all. The associates I interacted with were great, enjoyed working there, but were clear that you worked hard. I suppose it depends on the summer associate and the group he or she rotates through. To each her own.

Also, not sure how that person knows much about the NY / DC offices, we didn't have much exposure there....

avatar
84 Posted by Bob | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:03 PM

What is HUNTON's bonus structure?? Please explain

avatar
85 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:08 PM

Folks at Hunton just working there is the bonus. But they also offer $$$ because most of the associates soon realize the only reason they are there is HW offers the best potential compensation package in Richmond. My understanding is that it varies. Discretionary performance bonuses are offered, based on performance and market.

avatar
86 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:17 PM

I have to assume the vast majority of today's posters are law students...who in the world actually thinks any law firm is made up of nice guys and pollyana happy lawyers. Get in a good group, all law firms have them, and you'll be happy. Don't get in a good group, leave. Happens every day.

avatar
87 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:34 PM

Eighty-seventh!

avatar
88 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:53 PM

5:17 is dead on. The summer associate griping above is in for a reality check if he wants to work at BigLaw.

avatar
89 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:04 PM

K&L Gates Seattle gives multiple summer associates the same assignments, then compares them to see who did the best, and they only give offers to the best ones. Also, morale in Seattle is low since the merger.

avatar
90 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 7:52 PM

K&L Gates Pittsburgh is a decent place overall. They are about a year removed from some of the "right sizing" growing pains that other firms in the city are currently experiencing. The burning questions on most associate's mind in the Pittsburgh office is "is there a future here for us. Will there be a positive return on our investment of human capital?" There are no clear answers. Pittsburgh is a mature legal market place and there are few entities in the region that firm wants as clients that it doesn't already have. An attorney might make service partner after 9 years or so, but the prospects of becoming a equity member are low.

avatar
91 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:31 PM

Outside of Richmond, I think H&W is focusing primarily on growing the Dallas and Miami offices at the moment. Outside of the US, the London office seems to be the current darling.

NY and Atlanta, maybe not so much at the moment. The Los Angeles office (new addition) and the other international offices are still pretty small and focused on servicing a handful of clients or 1 or 2 markets, I think.

The smaller offices in Raleigh, Knoxville and Norfolk are remnants of an earlier age and don't seem to get much attention.

I can tell you though that the Richmond practice is hardly local. Sure, some practice areas are, but there are many attorneys in Richmond deal exclusively with clients and other law firms outside the state. Some deal only with people outside the country.

My advice to law students is to first decide where you want to live. Only then should you start comparing firms in that area. Don't let the so-called prestige of NY or DC draw you into a situation that you can't live with. If you decide that Richmond (or a city of that size and general geographic area) is for you, then you'd be silly not to consider H&W.

avatar
92 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:53 PM

Last Last!

avatar
93 Posted by Superman | Permalink Tuesday, August 28, 2007 11:49 PM

Can I just say I love C&P! They have very strong practice areas such as project finance, tax and products liability and strong regional experience in Africa/Middle East, Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union and Latin America.

Plus, the people are great.

I'm looking forward to following C&P developments, with the possible merger and all.

avatar
94 Posted by not a fan of NP | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:38 AM

Nixon Peabody is trying desperately to raise it stature (along with more than a few other firms). But every effort they make seems to backfire, and it seems like they just can't get it right. They have almost as many partners as they do associates, as a result of poor planning, small town roots and letting partners coast for too long. Now that they've merged with some other subpar firms, they've shifted their focus to "rising in the ranks" - unfortunately at the expense of civility towards partners, associates, support staff and everyone else in their path. Everyone feels squeezed, everyone is on edge and everyone is unhappy. They're probably desperate to merge and latch onto a decent firm, but their prospects aren't too good with their Rochester, New Hampshire and other out-of-town offices keeping them down and they're profits per partner on the low end. They'll hold out on raising salaries as long as they possibly can, there's no lockstep, bonuses are far from market and are a mystery, but they'll make sure to raise startiing salaries to market right before interviews, so they can make believe that they pay market. For a firm with this ranking that prides itself on being a quality of life firm, they've created far too many unhappy campers in the ranks of their current and ex partners, associates, staff.

avatar
95 Posted by Thacher Summer | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:55 AM

I recently summered at Thacher. I can confirm that it's a pretty decent place to work, and that most of the associates seem happy and have lives outside of work. Working on weekends is the exception, not the norm, and associates are encouraged to actually take their vacations. That said, most associates do work until 930 or 10 at night every day. Like everywhere in NYC, trying to work at Thacher and have a family life would be extremely difficult, at best. Most associates there do not have families, and those that start families generally leave shortly thereafter. Of course, as I said, that's the norm in NYC. Overall I'd say that Thacher is above average in terms of quality of life.

avatar
96 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:11 AM

H&W DC is a great place to work, and it looking at expanding. Its hard to get a job there out of law school because they prefer laterals. However, they get enough laterals to expand, which says something about their perception in DC.

avatar
97 Posted by Anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 8:55 AM

Hunton has been hiring lots of SCOTUS clerks for the Richmond and DC offices in the past few years.

avatar
98 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 10:11 AM

Here's the down side to TPW. The work at Thacher is very repetitive. Month after month of cookie cutter REMIC transactions. Bonus is based on hitting a minimum of 2100 hours.

Th upside is that there are only one or two screamers (both in structured finance). You may work very hard and long during the week, but rarely work weekends.

If you want to do litigation, big corporotate M&A, private equity, or bankruptcy work then this is not the place to be.

Thacher is about strucutured finance. If you are alright with that, you'll like it here.

avatar
99 Posted by former NP | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:22 PM

From experience, I advise anyone to avoid NP at all costs. The firm has major problems well beyond their stupid song. From my experience, it is worse than other biglaw firms in many ways. they dont have enough business to keep everyone busy, and they fire people (associates, staff) really unexpectedly. associates and staff are generally nice, but in my opinion, the rest of the place is toxic and desperate. I could go on at length but I won't.

Friends at K&L love it.

avatar
100 Posted by Hunton | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 12:31 PM

I summered at Hunton NY, and though I can't respond to the comments made about the Richmond office but I have nothing to say about my experience with the firm generally and the NY office particularly. NY is definately the new face of the firm - the (41 yr old!) managing partner of firm is now based out of NY. The work is sophisticated, particularly in the areas of business-type law and antitrust litigation. The attorneys are all happy and work reasonable hours for the most part. As I am now interviewing in another market (for personal reasons) where Hunton has no office / presence, attorneys regularly know the firm and the quality of work. This has helped me realize that the reputation is certainly national, and not the regional reputation that some other commenters suggest.

avatar
101 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 1:43 PM

Let's face it, you don't rank as high as Hunton does in the league tables and in Vault by performing regional work. Any suggestion otherwise is likely fueled by sour grapes and not realities of the market.

avatar
102 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 2:42 PM

True, 1:43, it takes some serious national and international deals to get you a spot above the winners at Nixon Peabody.

avatar
103 Posted by 1:43 | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 5:12 PM

LOL- true enough.

avatar
104 Posted by fusion | Permalink Wednesday, August 29, 2007 10:13 PM

Beware of K&L's New York office... The place has been a revolving door at mid- and senior levels. First years are in way over their heads in the corporate group. Litigation department doesn't know its ass from a hole in the wall...

avatar
105 Posted by nations | Permalink Saturday, September 1, 2007 5:23 AM

Any further information Re Chadbourne in NY, workplace, people etc? Has it rebounded from the massive fall in prestige rankings?

avatar
106 Posted by Anon | Permalink Thursday, September 6, 2007 12:38 PM

Anyone know what a 4th year earns at NP in Rochester?

avatar
107 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Thursday, September 20, 2007 1:00 AM

how does troutman sanders in richmond compare to MW and H&W? any thoughts?

avatar
108 Posted by girl | Permalink Friday, October 5, 2007 8:22 AM

chadbourne (ny) vs. schulte

any thoughts?

avatar
109 Posted by latecomer | Permalink Thursday, October 25, 2007 1:16 PM

"fusion" or anyone else with inside info...
Could you elaborate on your K&L (NY) warning? I'm considering an offer there, so details are greatly appreciated.

Post Your Comment