Add RSS RSS

Biglaw Perk Watch: Rewards for Big Billers

dinner fancy restaurant Above the Law blog.jpgOur series on the perks or fringe benefits of large law firm life has become somewhat sporadic, partly because we've covered so many of the biggies. To review our past posts, click here, and scroll down.

Today's perk: prizes for big billers. If you really kill yourself during a particular month, racking up 250 or 300 hours on some monster deal or litigation, do you get rewarded for it? Of course you might see your crazy hours reflected in your year-end bonus check. But might you get some other, non-monetary benefit? (And we're not counting being able to show up after 10 on the morning after an all-nighter.)

We don't know if this policy still exists, but a source sent us this interesting information:

When I was at Clifford Chance (f/k/a Rogers & Wells), a legacy Rogers & Wells program was that if you billed 250 in a month, the firm covered dinner for you and a guest (spouse, date, friend, etc...) with no questions asked. It was an amazing program. Historically, the Firm had no limit, but assumed associates would "just exercise the judgment expected of them."

It worked for years until a few "exceptions" decided to add very, very expensive bottles of wine to their orders. I think eventually the limit was set at $500. I know more than a handful of "superstars" tanked their careers by "not exercising the judgment expected of them" and submitting dinner bills for several thousands of dollars.

Anyone know if Clifford Chance still has this special dinner benefit?

We also hear that at WilmerHale, "super-super high billers" get vacation vouchers. Can anyone confirm and/or provide more details?

Update/Correction: Or maybe the WilmerHale workaholics get gift cards? See this comment.

Please discuss, in the comments. Thanks!

Comments
avatar
1 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:28 PM

I'm at WilmerHale, but I'm no super high biller, so no can do.

avatar
2 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:31 PM

$500 for two people to eat dinner is not a prize. It's a friday.

avatar
3 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:37 PM

Clifford Chance still has this policy in place, though it was amended about 2 years ago: the limit is now $400, but it's not limited to 2 people anymore. There is no limit on the number of guests, as long as it's $400. Not sure if the limit is a "hard" limit.

The $400 reimbursement to you is also taxable as imputed income under IRS regulations. No gross-up.

avatar
4 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:39 PM

What the hell is a vacation voucher? Is that like extra vacation? What are the odds that some D-bag who bills 300 hours/month is going to take the vacation he is given, much less extra vacation.

avatar
5 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:40 PM

3:31,

It serves is a gratifying acknowledgement of the Firm's appreciation of your hard work and personal sacrifices in terms of time away from loved ones and friends.

And it's a heck of a lot better than nothing at all.

avatar
6 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:40 PM

I'd rather the $400 in cash to schedule a day at the spa....

That's a very thoughtful gesture on CC's part. Really wish my firm did the same.

avatar
7 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:40 PM

I'm also at WilmerHale and I've never heard of the vacation vouchers. I know some pretty high billers and they haven't mentioned anything like that. I know people on some cases received gift cards.

avatar
8 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:42 PM

Cravath has "penalty dinners" where the associate goes out with a date and spends whatever he or she wants on dinner. A friend of mine got ridiculed for not spending enough.

avatar
9 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:52 PM

Townsend used to give associates who bill over 2600 (or 2800?) a Rolex. They ended it last year but one hard working associate didn't realize it was over. As a joke they bought his wife a Rolex anyway because he was gone all year.

avatar
10 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:06 PM

What a bunch of suckers. Seriously. A normal person should never have to bill more than 160 hours in a month. If you bill 250, that's 90 hours over which, at $300 an hour, is a cash bonus to the firm of an extra $27,000 for that month alone, with very little if any associated marginal operating expense for that extra profit. Out of that, they "reward" you with a $400 dinner. You bring them an extra 27 grand, all of which will go into equity partners' pockets to pay for their yachts and Porsches . They give you back about 1.5% of that as a reward. And people actually "appreciate" that. Now that is funny.

avatar
11 Posted by Yup | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:06 PM

Big billers get the ultimate prize: more work.

avatar
12 Posted by suspect is hatless | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:11 PM

Atlanta to 35% off Spa Sydell treatments!

avatar
13 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:14 PM

4:06, yup. As it is, most associates only get about a fifth (if that) of what they bring in anyway.

avatar
14 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:14 PM

I'm at Cravath, have billed over 250 hours many, many times, and have never even heard of the "penalty dinners".

avatar
15 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:15 PM

4:06
Most of these perks are above and beyond yearly bonuses that typically factor in billables.
Get your lazy ass to work. Only sissies bill 150 hours a month.

avatar
16 Posted by What firm are you with? | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:15 PM

Who the hell doesn't bill more than 160 in an average month????

avatar
17 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:15 PM

I heard that last year at WilmerHale the people who billed crazy hours (I think it was over 2700 or something) got two free plane tickets to anywhere in the continental US and were told to go take a vacation because the firm didn't want anyone billing that much. I did not bill nearly that much, but I was told this by a very reliable source.

avatar
18 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:16 PM

The satisfaction of a job well done is all the reward I require.

avatar
19 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:21 PM


What practice area generally leads to the greatest % of in-office hours being billable? I believe this is an important topic.

avatar
20 Posted by Penalty diner | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:21 PM

Cravath's "penalty dinners" are true and have been imported to the Armonk office of Boies Schiller, which has several ex-Cravath partners who came over with Boies when he started the firm.

At Boies Schiller, the dinners aren't formalized in the sense that you get to go out if you bill a certain number of hours. What happens is if you have a particularly horrendous filing or deal that requires all nighter after all nighter, the lead partner on the matter takes the associates out, with spouses/dates if you want, and drops about $5,000 on dinner. The "penalty" is presumably to the client, who eats the tab.

avatar
21 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:22 PM


What practice area generally leads to the greatest % of in-office hours being billable? I believe this is an important topic.

avatar
22 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:23 PM

Here at CWT if we bill more than 220 hours we get to keep our jobs.

avatar
23 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:28 PM

4:23, you call that a bonus or a penalty?

avatar
24 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:33 PM

"Who the hell doesn't bill more than 160 in an average month????"

Midlaw Phoenix. Base salary = $110K. Adjusted for NYC's cost of living = over $200,000.

avatar
25 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:36 PM

$400 or $500 dinner for 250 hours billed? What a joke.
Interviewed at a mid-size firm in LA and was told that if I hit 200 in a month, it was $1K cash, no questions asked.

avatar
26 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:41 PM

4:36: Yeah, but CC is one of the only firms that does something like this. I hit 250 a month many many times at my BigLaw firm and didn't get any special gift (in fact, I was told that I was expected to bill 250 a month, even though our stated minimum billable was 1900). The $1k cash is certainly a better deal (and one which I would love -- it would help me get Sallie Mae off my back that much sooner), but something is better than nothing and anything would be appreciated very much by most associates. So props to CC.

avatar
27 Posted by Phx Midlaw | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:44 PM

A biglaw firm expected you to bill 250 hours a month? I expect that kind of billing fraud to take place at an insurance defense sweatshop. Surprised to see it seep into a biglaw outfit. Wow.

avatar
28 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 4:53 PM

Well, the associates either had to put in those hours or the firm would have to turn clients/work away . . . .

avatar
29 Posted by Lowly BigLaw Paralegal | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:10 PM

I understand that associate hours are long and grueling, but I have just one question to put it into better perspective for me: What is the ratio of hours spent in the office to the hours actually billed? I ask because when I did my "calculations" for hours per day for a 2100 hour year, it seemed somewhat reasonable. Another reason is because I have been super slow in the litigation department, which makes me wonder where the insane amount of billables are coming from if there are no pages to check and no binders to make.

avatar
30 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:10 PM

4:04 makes a good point, but if you work those extra hours you also get a bigger bonus at the end of the year. go solo!!

avatar
31 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:12 PM

Hey Midlaw Phoenix,

Since the title of the blogpost is "BigLaw...", that makes your snippy comments rather irrelevant now don't they?

avatar
32 Posted by Lowly BigLaw Paralegal | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:15 PM

Oh, and no briefs to cite-check.

avatar
33 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:20 PM

NY to 190....

avatar
34 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:27 PM

4:33 Midlaw Phoenix. Base salary = $110K. Adjusted for NYC's cost of living = over $200,000...

Re-adjusted for living in a miserable city = $60k

avatar
35 Posted by Phx Midlaw | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:29 PM

Hey 5:12

What's so snippy about my comment?

I've had the opportunity to switch to Phx biglaw. It's easy in this town. But would you do it, given my numbers?

avatar
36 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:29 PM


If you are not billing 180 a month, you should be fired. Plus, I wouldn't want a job where I bill that little. I wouldn't learn anything. If you want to be lazy, go work for the government.

People that bill 150/month don't realize how far behind they are compared to their peers who actually work for a living.

avatar
37 Posted by Anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:32 PM

"Re-adjusted for living in a miserable city = $60k"

Different strokes for different folks, dude. NYC is a big festering dump if you ask me, especially if you have to live in a 75 square foot apartment as most New Yorkers I know with six-figure salaries do. I guess there's always Brooklyn. (muffled laugh)

Living like a sewer rat gets old after a while.

avatar
38 Posted by How Sweet it Is | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:33 PM

I average 120 legit billables a month. Salary= 125K with bonus. I dig it.

avatar
39 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:34 PM

5:29,

Your comments are completely meaningless without an accounting showing your firm's break-even point. At many firms it's at 100 hours, which means that billing 150 hours brings in 50 hours of pure profit to the firm, rendering your 180 hours pretty meaningless except in increasing the degree of wealth of your equity partners.

avatar
40 Posted by 5:29 | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:39 PM

Hey 5:34--My comment had nothing to do with firm accounting for the financials. It had to do with whether you are developing as a lawyer. Are you learning anything? At what point could you practice without some old dude watching over your shoulder? If you are only billing 150 per month, I would never trust your work.

avatar
41 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:49 PM

"If you are not billing 180 a month, you should be fired. Plus, I wouldn't want a job where I bill that little. I wouldn't learn anything."

Are you serious? How many hours you bill has very little relationship to what you're "learning." If you get staffed on an enormous doc review, you'll put in time, but how much are you learning? Not all that much.

avatar
42 Posted by stop rationalizing nyc biglaw | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:49 PM

@ 5:29:

I don't see where billing 180 is any sort of magic number that proves that you're learning anything. Someone who bills 140 but did it arguing in court, writing briefs on challenging issues, or even taking deps learned a heck of a lot more than someone at a biglaw sweatshop who billed 180 for doc review and signing form letters. Half the time people end up billing 250 it's because the partners loaded them down with busywork to pad the firm's bottom line.

avatar
43 Posted by haha | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:58 PM

I billed well over 400 hours one month and got nothing for it and had to fight with the firm to get them to cover my missed travel and even tix.

avatar
44 Posted by Former associate | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:58 PM

I once got a coupon from Proskauer NY after working crazy hours for 4 or 5 months straight. It basically told me I could bill any one of about 10 things (worth about $500 IIRC) to the firm, like an iPod, a day at a spa, theater tickets, etc. I had never heard of the program before and I have no idea what the threshold might have been. But it was a nice touch after several months of no sleep.

avatar
45 Posted by 4:16 is my hero! | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 5:58 PM

I just want to do a good job!

avatar
46 Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:01 PM

My Vault Top 5 satellite office does it informally. If you have a horrific month or two (it would have to be at least 300 hours), the partner you are working for usually offers to pay for a dinner for you and a guest. However, it depends on the partner.

avatar
47 Posted by 5:49 | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:13 PM

Hey, 5:49 , what a way to use an extreme example! People don't do doc reviews forever but move into doing more sophisticated work.

The harder you work, the better work you get b/c people can rely on you and b/c you know more than the lazy goofball in the office next door.

Stop rationalizing under-performance.

avatar
48 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:17 PM

I agree that anyone averaging only 160 per month should be let go. It's not because they aren't learning or developing, it's because they aren't carrying their fair share of work and are leaving their peers to pick up their slack (all the while pulling down the same paycheck). Having some associates leave at 5:30 or 6 each night while others have a standing dinner delivery order is extremely demoralizing for top-performing associates (unless, of course, those top-performing associates receive bonuses comensurate to their pain).

avatar
49 Posted by stop rationalizing nyc biglaw | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:25 PM

You really don't get cause and effect, do you? It's not working long hours, in and of itself, that's going to get you lots of sophisticated work to do. It's doing a good job in the first place and proving yourself to the partners in your firm. If you turn out excellent product but only bill 150 that month, it's true that next month you're probably going to bill 180. That's because the partners will realize they're underutilizing a valuable resource. You won't get more work because a partner is going through the bills at the end of the month, sees you billed 230, and figures you must be great. I've worked with plenty of d-bags who've padded their bills and couldn't handle jack squat as attorneys.

avatar
50 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:31 PM

Therein lies the folly of lockstep billing. You have to deal with freeloaders and lazy asses who count on you to pick up their slack.

avatar
51 Posted by $250 for 250 hours | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:03 PM

I'm at a mid-size west cost firm (Fenwick & West). We have the 250/250. If you bill 250 hours in a month, you get a dinner for (spouse, friend etc.) up to $250. Some of you might think that is cheap, and believe me, nobody here aims to hit 250 hours in any month. But when you do have that bad month, it is a nice Small thank you gift.

avatar
52 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:39 PM

If I bill over 200, I take the managing partner to dinner. How messed up is that?

avatar
53 Posted by M&M Associate | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:52 PM

At my firm, the associate who bills the most hours in a given month wins a Cadillac Eldorado. 2nd most gets a set of steak knives.

avatar
54 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:54 PM

NUGGIT

avatar
55 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 8:45 PM

first

avatar
56 Posted by Efficiency | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 8:51 PM

Actually, I'm tired of the inefficient "top performers" who take 6 hours to do 2 hours worth of work, leaving me to take on extra tasks after I finish in a reasonable amount of time. I guess that's 4 hours of learning for the other guy! I imagine being inefficient and not that bright is a great way to get that billable number up...and learn??

avatar
57 Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:30 PM

4:14: penalty dinners, I think, are more common on the corporate side. I've killed myself on a bunch of deals (including 3 all-nighters in a row on two different deals) and have never been given a penalty dinner. Some of our other colleagues may just work for more generous partners.

avatar
58 Posted by chicago | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:07 PM

jenner had a program where if you topped 250 reported hours (included recruiting) three months in a row, you got $100 gift certificate at crate & barrel. With that kind of generosity, it's a wonder their PPP is still so low.

avatar
59 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:26 PM

@ 9:30,

Curious, when you say "3 all-nighters in a row," what does that mean -- that you worked non-stop for 72 hours, without sleeping (at all)?

avatar
60 Posted by No reason to bill 250 | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:31 PM

I have billed over 250 at two different biglaw firms and received no special gift, monetary or otherwise. As for the average monthly billable hour issue, I think it depends on what you are working on. When you are the only associate (or one of a few) working on one big case, it's easy to rack up the hours. If, however, you are juggling numerous smaller matters, it is much harder to bill as much. I have had days where I spent 11 hours in the office and only billed 8 due to non-billable matters (such as billing questions) and the general problem of having 12 time entries to small matters. Either way, billing 220 or above = crappy life, so I have cut back significantly and aim to bill approximately 42.5 hours a week (on top of numerous non-billable hours). I would be concerned about the effect of not billing more, but the chances of partnership are nonexistent, so there is really no incentive.

avatar
61 Posted by anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:42 PM

5:49(2):

How the fuck do you know? My bad: I forgot that Phoenix (or some other mid-level city full of hyper-competitive nimrods seeking to justify the fact that they can't get a job in NY) is filled with high-stakes litigation/stimulating deals.

Keep up the good work defending State Farm.

avatar
62 Posted by People only billing 250 are slackers | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:46 PM

If you get one free dinner at 250 hours in a month. does that mean you get two free dinners for 500 hours in a month?

avatar
63 Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:38 PM

Random thoughts

(1) At my firm, the people billing 140 a month aren't efficient, they're slackers. If you have to work with them, you'll end up doing all the work because (a) they'll never finish it on time, and (b) it'll suck anyway.

(2) Although $500 is a little cheap as compared to the profits on a $1000 month, it's still better than nothing, which is what I've gotten the many months I've busted 200, 250, or even 300. They did give me three days off before my wedding though, so that was nice.

(3) The whole "but you get a bigger bonus" noise is crap, especially for junior associates. You really think that at a 1950 firm, the associate who bills 2700 hours gets a bonus equivalent to three months pay more than the associate who bills 2100 hours? Really? At my firm, first and second years are locked between about $25k and $35k, which means that once you hit 2200 hours, you're working for free.

avatar
64 Posted by anonymator | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:29 AM

11:38:

Once you hit 2200 hours, you're working for the large salary you already get, though your bonus won't get larger.

avatar
65 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:01 AM

One month I billed 300 hours, and the firm bought me a bunch of meth...it had a street value of $500.

avatar
66 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 6:32 AM

I just billed 300 last month on a very large litigation. My prize? The senior partner gave me a hard time because some of my other files had fallen a little behind.

avatar
67 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 7:03 AM

12:29: the salary at a 1950 firm is based on billing 1950 hours, FOR THE WHOLE YEAR. If I pay a plumber $200 to unclog my sink, and he does it in 10 minutes, he doesn't say "I'm done early, how about I clean the gutters." He goes home.

I repeat, once you hit 2200, you're working for free.

avatar
68 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:40 AM

Lat, can we do a post on bonuses....i.e. what firms have bonuses, what firms dont, what you have to do to hit a bonus, and how much the bonuses are. (point in case: im starting at a bigfirm this week and have no idea about the bonus structure)

avatar
69 Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 10:56 AM

Must be nice...

avatar
70 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:35 AM

7:52: Don't forget that the third-highest biller and everyone on down get fired.

avatar
71 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:49 AM

Latham has a "hardship bonus" - kill yourself on a deal, partners tell you to do a nice dinner on them

avatar
72 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 11:50 AM

How much do typical associates at WilmerHale bill in a year?

avatar
73 Posted by guest | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 12:10 PM

WTF? Which office of Latham has a "hardship" bonus? In LA, you kill yourself on a deal, you get a call the day after closing (or day of if you're not lucky) from the same partner re-staffing you on the next deal.

avatar
74 Posted by Sweet it is | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:32 PM

Complimentary b/j from high end hooker for hitting 325 in a month...

avatar
75 Posted by anon | Permalink Wednesday, September 12, 2007 3:00 PM

Cadwalader has a dinner voucher they issue to associates who bill enough in a month. It is limited to specific restaurants, the Kobe Club being one a know of for sure.

Post Your Comment