Add RSS RSS

Fall Recruiting Open Thread: No-Offer Factories

factory no offer cold offer summer associates Above the Law blog.jpgIn case you're not familiar with it, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione is an intellectual property law firm headquartered in Chicago, with approximately 150 lawyers firmwide. A tipster recently wrote to us: "Word on the street is that Brinks no-offered half their SA class."

Here's the posting on Greedy Chicago cited by this source:

To confirm, I was in their 2007 summer class that included 16 people in Chicago, and at least 8 of us, perhaps more, did not get offers to come back. I'm probably biased towards myself, but I can honestly say that the other people who did not get offers are very competent people who worked very hard during the summer.

The reasons that we all received for not receiving offers were absolutely ludicrous and obviously cooked up. What's worse is that we were all told throughout the summer that we were doing a great job (some of us did not hear a word of "constructive criticism" all summer). A lot of shady stuff took place over the summer, and I'm happy to provide more info to anybody who is interested

From our source: "I want to know what other firms are cutting back!"

You're not alone! Here's an open thread for discussion of firms that (1) "no-offered" sizable portions of their summer classes or (2) didn't extend offers to summer associates for dubious reasons.

Please discuss, in the comments. But please do NOT identify any individual summer associates by name. Thanks.

Re: Brinks troubles? [Greedy Chicago / Infirmation]

Comments
avatar
Posted by She declined | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 3:49 PM

Over the weekend an attractive woman declined an offer made by my penis but her ugly friend accepted.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 3:49 PM

Should have gone to a real firm.

avatar
Posted by Loyola 2L | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 3:50 PM

How about no-interview factories?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:04 PM

Patton Boggs in DC didn't give offers to half of their summer associates.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:05 PM

I'd be interested to hear about "no offer" factories, but I would be equally up for hearing about any "no offers," even if just one or two, with the firm specified and, if available, the reason for the "no offer."

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:08 PM

Venable in DC pulled this last summer, and informed those who did not get offers via e-mail.

avatar
Posted by BF | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:09 PM

I'd like to hear about the "shady stuff" that occurred.

avatar
Posted by Dude who's already got a job | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:14 PM

For real, I want to hear the dirty little stories as well.

My firm only hired 50%, but then again, there were only two of us. HAHAHAHA. To the victor goes the spoils.

avatar
Posted by Ricky Tan | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:16 PM

4:14: if you are practicing "law" in a firm that hires only 2 summer associates, well son let me break it to you - you're not really practicing law and what you have can hardly be claimed to be a legal "job."

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:16 PM

Count Kilpatrick Stockton among those no-offer factories...

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:22 PM

Which Kilpatrick Office? Or was it firm wide?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:24 PM

Kilpatrick Atlanta gives a lot of soft offers, which aren't as bad.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:34 PM

Ricky, I'm awfully tired of you impersonating a Big Lawyer. Your ignorance proves time and again that you are utterly clueless about BigLaw. There are many top firms that have satellite offices that might only hire one or two SAs a summer. Not every branch office supports huge summer classes. The firm is not less top notch because it has smaller offices scattered around. Please get back to getting ready for interviews. Maybe this year you'll make it . . .

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:35 PM

Doesn't Kilpatrick Atlanta give "guaranteed offers" to all summer associates (they used to)? If so, that is probably why they have to "soft offer" a number of SAs.

avatar
Posted by List of Weak Shame | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:37 PM

1. Patton Boggs
2. Venable
3. Kilpatrick Stockton
4. Some crappy IP firm in Chicago
5. ?

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:40 PM

For instance, perhaps said individual was a summer at S&C in Palo Alto.
Note only two Summer Associates:
http://nalpdirectory.com/dledir_search_results.asp

Gosh, what a TTT firm! Oh wait . . .

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:40 PM

Kirkland DC gave offers to 100% of their summers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:41 PM

King and Spalding Houston no-offered a bunch of top school kids who ostensibly did good work.

Apparently they over hired

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:43 PM

Not Kirkland Chicago, though, apparently!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:46 PM

Pillsbury Winthrop NoVa gave out several no-offers. Not sure about the other offices, but I think the too-many-summers not-enough-slots problem permeated all offices.

avatar
Posted by List of Weakness | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:48 PM

1. Patton Boggs (DC)
2. Venable (DC)
3. Kilpatrick Stockton (DC)
4. Some crappy IP firm in Chicago
5. King & Spalding (Houston)
6. ?

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:49 PM

A couple of summers ago Ward & Smith in North Carolina screwed ALL of their summers when they hired their biggest summer class in years (7 or 8, it is a small town) and "no offered" everyone. When potential summers asked about the large size of the class, they were told that if they did a good job and "fit in" they had nothing to worry about and were assured that the firm only hired based on defined needs and could take up to the all of them. The result was that no one got an offer and they said "Sorry we overestimated our needs". They did not even offer to help write recommendation letters for them. All people were very competent. Unfortunately some did not split with another firm. Pretty unprofessional on the firm's part.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:50 PM

Any firm that gives no-offers because it over estimated its hiring needs deserves to be on a special "extra shame" list.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:50 PM

I heard about King & Spaulding Houston as well. A friend of mine got no-offered there along with a few other summers who were told they all did good work.

avatar
Posted by List of Weakness | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:50 PM

1. Patton Boggs (DC)
2. Venable (DC)
3. Kilpatrick Stockton (DC)
4. Some crappy IP firm in Chicago
5. King & Spalding (Houston)
6. Pillsbury Winthrop (NoVa)
7. ?

What's up with DC/NoVa?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:51 PM

Does anyone know of or personally have had their offers suspended/pulled similar to IBanking analyst offers?

If you're unaware, lots of banks are "suspending" the offers given to their incoming analyst class so they don't have a class full of people with nothing to do. I'm wondering if any law firms have either told any incoming first years that they don't need them, or have pushed back their starting dates because they don't have the work right now

avatar
Posted by List of Extra Shame | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:53 PM

1. Patton Boggs (DC)
2. Venable (DC)
3. Kilpatrick Stockton (DC)
4. Some crappy IP firm in Chicago
5. King & Spalding (Houston)
6. Pillsbury Winthrop (NoVa)
7. Some crappy firm in NC
8. ?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:57 PM

This is obviously off topic, but this thread has me wondering:

If you received a gift during the winter preceding your 2L summer (from the firm), and you received and accepted an offer to return after graduation, did you receive a give during your 3L winter?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 4:58 PM

Apparently Baker Botts in Houston no offered a bunch of Summers for bad 2L grades.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:00 PM

Watt Tieder (NoVa) gave out a lot of no offers in 2005. Most summers had no idea it was coming.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:00 PM

Skadden Chicago gave offers to everyone in their summer class.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:03 PM

Baker Hostetler no-offered 2 out of 3 2L summer associates in one of their offices this year.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:04 PM

everyone is interested

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:06 PM

Either there are no University of Chicago students at Skadden or Kirkland (Chicago), or they make offers before one's summer is over. (Or do they announce that "everyone is getting an offer"?)

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:08 PM

I was a summer at Harris Beach in Rochester, NY a couple of years ago. About 200 lawyers firm-wide, hired a summer class of three, and no-offered everybody because they "overestimated their needs." All very competent; I went on to clerk for a federal court of appeals judge and the other two landed jobs with Harter Secrest & Emery and Nixon Peabody in Rochester.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:12 PM

So everyone, in the end, was indeed a winner...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:14 PM

indeed, everyone's a winner at Nixon Pea-bo-dy

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:15 PM

Which Baker Hostetler Office? Cleveland and DC gave offers to everyone.

avatar
Posted by Amlaw top 5 SA, completely blindsided with no offer | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:16 PM

worst part is, who is going to hire you as a 3L?

L2L will love this. I actually summered and then they told me they don't usually hire from my school. This was after they led me to believe I had nothing to worry about all summer.

I would like to hear of any success stories of 2Ls that got no offered.

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:19 PM

Baker Hostetler no offered 2 out of 4 summers in one office.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:19 PM

Baker and McDonald's?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:21 PM

Fragomen Del Rey Bernsen & Loewy AGAIN made 50% no-offers...last year 4/9

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:25 PM

Fragomen doesn't work like most law firms though, so I'm not sure they really count. They basically just process immigration docs more than anything, only 20 partners, but PPP is over $2.0MM, associates are nothing to them, it's all about the processing equipment.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:26 PM

Fraggle and Rock, LLP no offered four of its summers, and told the other three to go down in the hole.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:26 PM

5:16, that's a bummer, and doesn't say much for that firm. I don't know of any success stories (though I'm sure there are many), but were I in your shoes, I would change (intended) cities, and try to frame the issue as a change of heart on your part (as to where you want to live): "Well, I enjoyed working at that firm, and received praise all summer, but the powers-that-be caught wind of the fact that I actually have no intention of staying that city, because I really want to settle in (insert target firms' city here)."

avatar
Posted by none | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:28 PM

Lots of people get hired as 3Ls. I'm a 2002 graduate and a lot of my class was no offered (or offer rescinded). Most ended up getting biglaw jobs and a few clerked or went to the government.

Re: pushing back the start date: if a firm offers you a choice between pushing back the start date or three months or more of severance, take the severance. 2002 was also the year of pushbacks. I have a friend who opted for a delayed start date and when that date came around was told nevermind. Take the money and run!

avatar
Posted by Marshall Field's or Macy's... | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:28 PM

Frango Mints?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:29 PM

1. Patton Boggs (DC)
2. Venable (DC)
3. Kilpatrick Stockton (DC)
4. Some crappy IP firm in Chicago
5. King & Spalding (Houston)
6. Pillsbury Winthrop (NoVa)
7. Some crappy firm in NC
8. Reed Smith (Oakland/SF)
9. ?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:32 PM

5:28, what firms were rescinding offers? (Or at least give a city and a Vault rung.) Any idea how your firm (or others) made the decision as to who survived?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:42 PM

Scott, Douglass, McConnico (Austin, TX), has no offered a class of 9. That's 9 kids (7-8 2Ls 1-2 1Ls) and only one 1L was invited back for the next summer.

avatar
Posted by Ashley Brewer | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:42 PM

Please forgive the slightly off-topic post, but I have also shared my clerking story at the bottom of it.

If you were no-offered from your summer clerkship, I provide career coaching and career search assistance for lawyers and law students. I am a licensed attorney, went to a top 25 law school, and spent six years practicing law for different sized firms, including one mentioned on this thread.

p.s. I didn't get an offer from my summer clerkship either, seven years ago (not at a firm mentioned on this thread, and because it was so long ago, I won't name the firm, because they may have changed their practices since then). I was in a group of six clerks, half of which were no-offered, with no explanation given. The firm assured me both at callbacks and the first week on the job that "we're not the kind of firm to hire six clerks and give only a few offers; if you do good work, you've got nothing to worry about; in fact, last year we gave everyone offers." I had three performance reviews during the summer, all of which were good. I was told that performance reviews actually meant something, because in previous years when a clerk had performed poorly, the firm was good about telling them so, and still giving an offer when work improved. Having gotten good reviews, I didn't think I had anything to worry about. Half way through the summer, someone at the firm took the clerks to lunch and slipped that the previous year was unusual in everyone getting offers, and in fact, the firm had been known to give 1 or 0 offers to groups of four to six clerks. The implication was a deliberate tendency to overhire. As soon as I got back to school, I checked their NALP form, which was dated the first week of JULY, and it said they were only giving 2-3 offers to their 6-clerk class. They knew what they were doing before the summer was half way over.

That being said, yes, it is hard to interview as a 3L. It's hard to go back to school and hear everyone else talking about their offers, especially the ones who got two offers from splitting. But you will recover from it. You might not get your first choice job, but it is possible to work your way up to a big firm if that's what you want.

avatar
Posted by boston | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:47 PM

I met an attorney who was a SA at Mintz Levin in Boston in 2001. They had a huge summer class, and then the bubble burst...
So half the class started in 2002, half the class in 2003. Those starting later were paid a reduced salary for the year they were out of work. And the 2002 summer class was of course much smaller.

avatar
Posted by blindsided | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:48 PM

5:26

yeah, that is what I was thinking but the sad part is that Loyola 2L goes to a much much more prestigious school than I. (Went here for family reasons, not because it was all I could get into). Looking into govt now as well.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:53 PM

didn't skadden-dc make staff atty offers to a bunch of SAs a few years back?

avatar
Posted by Mike Hawk | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:53 PM

The worst kept secret in the legal industry is that IP boutiques are a dying breed. Brinks Hofer did these summer associates a favor by not offering them so they could be passenger on a sinking ship.

avatar
Posted by IP | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:57 PM

"The worst kept secret in the legal industry is that IP boutiques are a dying breed. Brinks Hofer did these summer associates a favor by not offering them so they could be passenger on a sinking ship. "

Mike, Please elaborate!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 5:57 PM

Baker & Hostetler LA, I believe, for those of you wondering.

LA has so many "big" firms that suck, are shady, are ID firms in disguise, it is sickening. But it explains the high no-offer rate.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:02 PM

what is an ID firm?

avatar
Posted by IP2 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:02 PM

Yes Mike, do. Very interesting!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:03 PM

That's weird about LA. I think Baker Hostetler only had two out there. Maybe they took on some extras.

avatar
Posted by ID4 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:04 PM

Insurance defense

avatar
Posted by King & Spalding a sinkin' ship | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:09 PM

re. King & Spalding in Houston--three summers from the same top-ten school (the only three from that school) were no-offered. All three were told during the summer that they were doing great work--not a word of criticism until the no-offer came.

avatar
Posted by IP3 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:09 PM

Mike, just because "Biglaw" is now doing "IP litigation" doesn't mean IP boutiques are drying up. This only means that the world now has too many wannabe IP attorneys out there without the proper training and background!!

avatar
Posted by anon 3L | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:12 PM

Fragomen really f__ed over its summers. You could substitute "Fragomen" for Briggs" and publish the exact same story.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:15 PM

"Baker & Hostetler LA, I believe, for those of you wondering."

"That's weird about LA. I think Baker Hostetler only had two out there. Maybe they took on some extras. "

I'm an associate at Baker Hostetler in Orlando. I can confirm that 2 of our 2L summers (out of 3) did not get offers.

I don't know anything about the L.A. office and their offers. I do know that we acquired the Jenkins Gilchrist L.A. office, so maybe that accounts for the discrepency in the summer associate humbers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:24 PM

The real crime is not no-offering but failing to inform the summers. Chicago firms like Jenner and Bell Boyd were especially guilty of this (a few years ago, at least) -- summers who had received no criticism during the summer just never heard from the firms at all, sometimes even after calling to inquire.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:26 PM

a buddy of mine summered at thelen reid (NYC) and he told me they explicitly told the class they over-hired (due to the merger) and werent giving offers to half of them. He got one but worked like a dog.

avatar
Posted by Big Law IP | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:26 PM

IP botiques are indeed a dying breed. They lack economies of scale to keep up with the big firms, who can easily "cross-pollinate" to snag the IP work of the corporate clients they already service.

And since most botiques are local with one or two offices (e.g. Brinks Hofer, Knobbe), they can't offer the global or even national platform that big patent litigations demand. Even Fish can't keep up, see for example their recent huge loss for Microsoft in the z4 case in Texas.

So increasingly, the botiques are relying on prosecution and opinion work to pay the bills. Problem is, prosecution is commodtized with extreme downward rate pressure, and opinions are no longer necessary in view of the Sup. Ct's recent Seagate decision.

So yes, the IP trend is towards big law or lit botiques. Oh, and India for the rest of the commody prosecution work.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:27 PM

For the Skadden DC -- no, that is not true. The staff atty program has only been around a few years (since late '04), but it's completely separate. You wouldnt get an offer to be a staff atty coming out of the summer class.

avatar
Posted by No Offer-ita | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:30 PM

I got "no-offered" by a mid-size in DC in 2002, even after they gave me a glowing (and written) review. About 1/3 of the summers got no-offered that year. Bad economy = way to screw up my career.

Ended up at some small firms for a few years, then decided to change fields and got back into the big firm pool. It was very difficult. That "no-offer" is quite a stigma.

avatar
Posted by Definitely not Judge Posner | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:31 PM

I don't understand the economics of the situation. How can firms be expected to hire so many summer associates? Do that many lawyers retire each year? Is the legal market expanding so rapidly that the firms can take on junior associates at $165 a pop without consideration of overhead costs, especially when the first few years the firm is just paying for the associate's hands-on experience that he didn't get in law school?

Seriously, someone explain.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:33 PM

thelen summers got screwed by the brown raysman merger. both firms had already hired summers before the mergers, so the class was essentially double its normal size.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:35 PM

career services is advising students not to go to thelen because of their bad record of no-offers

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:37 PM

Most new hires only stick around for 2-4 years at most. Many firms have a dearth of mid-level associates.

avatar
Posted by IP3 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:41 PM

Big Law IP,

Prosecution is not going to India. Last time I checked, a Patent Bar was required to prosecute.

Second,
Although Biglaw can snag a lot of the IP work from their corporate clients, for the most part (not all), they still lack the expertise in the art areas.

Third,
I think you are about 20 years behind on understanding IP Boutiques such as Brinks and Knobbe. From Knobbe's website it appears that they service every corner of the globe with MDs, PhDs, etc. in every art area speaking numerous languages. Also, I believe I counted six offices all across california (State of some of the best technology and IP work in the world). Not quite what I would call local!

need I go on...

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:46 PM

I can see it in your eyes.You don't have a single fucking offer.

I see you every time you walk down the halls. You recover from your zombie-like trance just long enough to avert your eyes away from mine. The semester has worn you down and what do you have to show for it? You are a stump of a man.

You hope I don't start up a conversation with you because you know it will lead to the inevitable. That talk and pitter patter about plans for the summer. Great summer plans of getting wined and dined in some far off city. Great plans of meeting new people and getting paid to do nothing. Because you didn't get a single fucking offer. And I can see the pain in your eyes.

I had more callbacks than you had first-interviews. I had more offers than the number of firms who would even deign to look at you twice. I've been to more cities in 4 weeks than you or your grandchildren will ever set foot in during their entire lives. Chicago, New York, LA. I can tell you which airlines fly from which terminals and how many feet you have to walk to get to the 6:50 flight to LaGuardia from the 5:30 flight from O'Hare. I've had more money thrown at me on a single dinner than you spent on food in an entire month. Because you had heard about the stories of excess. And they wouldn't even let you glance inside the window.

For me, normalcy begins again when I write my last exam for my last final of this semester. But for you, it never begins. I see you in the library paging through your casebook. I see you rush to each of your classes: a sense of urgency in the way you move. Because you lost the 1L race, and you'd like to move just a little faster for the 2L one.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:50 PM

6:46 You will never be normal.

avatar
Posted by IP-Curious | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:51 PM

Any word on the IP shops in NY (Kenyon, Fitzpatrick, Frommer, Darby, et al.)?

avatar
Posted by Re: 6:50 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:53 PM

6:50: 6:46 is quoting a classic XO schtick.

avatar
Posted by Who is the best IP shop? | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 6:55 PM

Although the IP shops are apparently doomed, as of today, who is the best IP shop in the US and who is the best in the west? Thanks.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:05 PM

6:26, Fish actually got the trial judge to set aside the damage award. hmmmm...maybe they can compete?
Check your facts. (no, I don't work there)

avatar
Posted by BigLaw IP Lover | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:05 PM

All IP boutiques are TTT's.

avatar
Posted by Waiting on bar results... | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:06 PM

I noticed that a law firm in town is hiring staff attorneys for patent work. And I saw that 6:27 mentioned a staff attorney program. What is a staff attorney? And how does that differ from a regular attorney?

I understand how it works in a court (ie 11th circuit has clerks and then staff attorneys) but I didn't realize law firms had a separate title of staff attorney rather than associate. Can someone explain? Sorry if this is a dumb question.

avatar
Posted by IP in NY | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:09 PM

Frommer and Darby have had a lot of turnover the past couple of years. Some of the associates have bolted for Cohen Pontani and Axinn Veltrop.

I would not say IP boutiques are gonna go away anytime soon. Many IP clients prefer specialized and smaller firms.

avatar
Posted by IP-Curious | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:11 PM

Lots of turnover means they'll be more likely to "dig deep" this OCI season, correct?

Also I'd like to throw MoFi into the discussion, forgot about them.

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:12 PM

Sakes alive! I have a callback there. Would it doom my chances at an offer to bring this up?

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:13 PM

6:33/34 brown raysman themselves no-offered a bunch of summers back in 2001. (And it was before 9/11.)

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:14 PM

I'd think they wouldn't like it too much if they knew you read ATL. They'd know that you have all of the dirt on everyone.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:16 PM

6:41
Though you do have pass the registration examination to prosecute patents, I don't think you necessarily have to be a US Citizen. I think so long as you are registered in good standing to prosecute patents before your own country's patent office and meet the US requirements you can sit for the Patent Agent's exam. See page 1 titled Foreigners at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/olia/oed/grb.pdf

avatar
Posted by IP litigator | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:17 PM

7:05 said, "All IP boutiques are TTT's."

Quite frankly, some of the IP boutiques are harder to get into than many Vault 50 GP firms.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:17 PM

read on another site that Dickstein Shapiro NY no-offered half their 2L class this year

avatar
Posted by IP4 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:18 PM

Hiring at the IP firms seems to depend more on your background than your law school credentials. If they need EE's, they're going to hire EE's regardless of whether or not they made law review. Same goes for chemists, etc. depending on what they have coming down the pipeline.

As someone who's going through the interview process at most of these firms now, I think it's pretty frustrating to see people with crappier credentials get the callbacks based on their background, but thems the breaks (I also got 2 callbacks that I'm convinced that I am not qualified for, so I'm not exactly crying on my keyboard.)

As far as no-offering, it looks like they're all pretty good about offers (by their NALP forms) but I bet that the volatility in their work leads to some volatility in their SA offers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:29 PM

Fish (dallas) two summers ago to a 1L - you just didnt catch on as quickly as the rest of your summer class. This after she was a 1L (from a top 5 law school)!! and never got any real feedback.

Also from Dallas - Locke Liddell & Sapp - merged with a firm this summer and denied offers to several people.

Their reasons - your overall work product did not meet expectations (after little to no feedback, even when asked).

And to another summer - "you failed to catch on to texas citation rules until your last memo, and we didnt understand some of your arguments in TWO of your SIX memos. Your arguments werent fully developed in those." This also after the summer got little to no feedback, got great reviews from other attys and came from a Top 5 law school.

Lawyers from another Dallas firm werent surprised by LLS's actions, which speaks to how they treat summers in past years.


Future Dallas lawyers beware!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:30 PM

I wonder, has there ever been a case of NALP fraud? Like a firm no offers a bunch of 2Ls, but "forgets" to make that clear on the form. Has that ever happened, and would anybody notice?

avatar
Posted by Dickstein lawyer | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:32 PM

hey 7:17 - re: Dickstein NY--

That is simply not true. There were two no offers, and both were very unique situations.

avatar
Posted by Recovered | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:33 PM

I didn't get an offer my 2L year. I OCI'd during the fall for different cities and got a couple of nibbles but no offer. I ended up sending out resumes all winter and spring and got a job a boutique firm in my practice area in a different city.

I have switched jobs since then and no one has ever asked if I got an offer from my summer firm. I think my accomplishments since then help considerably.

Bottom line: if you don't get an offer, you aren't screwed. Get on a journal, do moot court, try to write an article, do part time work for a local attorney, if possible. Make yourself as attractive as possible, both for your first job, and for your next job, which you will leapfrog to based on your credentials and experience.

FYI, once you get your job, you know how lucky you are and you will work your butt off.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:44 PM

7:29 -- I have a friend who got no offered from LLS a couple of years back, again from an out-of-state school. Apparently, if you don't catch onto the Texas way of doing things within your six weeks, they have no trouble telling you to take a hike, even after good reviews.

I think part of the problem is that they know everyone in Texas splits summers, so they feel confident if they no offer you, your other firm will probably give you a spot. I heard those rumblings during my split summer last year.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:49 PM

7:30

Isn't it convenient that a firm can make a cold offer and that constitutes an offer for the purposes of NALP.

"Hey, we made offers to all our SA's (with the caveat that they not accept it)

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:50 PM

@ 7:33 - I think you are thinking of OCI while we are talking about getting an offer for a full-time position after graduation because of your summer associateship.

But, your point is well taken. If you can't get into BigLaw, go public interest for a year or two (despite the salary). Makes it look less like you couldn't get a good gig after law school and more like you chose a different route. I know lots of laterals big government agencies... also, though competitive, you can usually find someplace where you are needed.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:54 PM

Another Dallas firm with a sizeable no-offer was Hunton. Had a class of 20+ and no-offered a sizable portion (around half) and the only reasons given were vague platitudes of having to make tough choices given a competitive summer class, despite saying that they had room for everyone at the beginning of the summer.

avatar
Posted by It isn't the firm--it is YOU | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 7:55 PM

When I summered with LLS, they only no-offered the clearly socially retarded. One of them was from an ivy league school. Same story at the other Dallas firm I split with. Your work product is an excuse they use, because they don't want to hurt your feelings that your personality sucks.

I am not a native Texan--just not a freak--and I had no problem getting an offer from LLS and another BigTex firm.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:02 PM

"When I summered with LLS, they only no-offered the clearly socially retarded."

If it was so clear that these people were "socially retarded," how did they make it through the call back process? It is mighty toolish of a firm to hire a person (largely based on his or her personality) and then reject that same person for his personality.

If the only reason a person is rejected is personality, then the least the firm could do is give a cold offer.

avatar
Posted by anonymous | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:03 PM

King and spalding atlanta rumored to have no-offered at least 30% of their summers. This from an associate with a friend at K&S, though. Same as Houston- they overhired last summer.

What will also suck is the summers for 08, who will be competiting for increasingly small summer classes plus concerns about no-offers at the end of it all.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:07 PM

What is a cold offer?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:18 PM

BASICALLY 2LS SHOULD NOT GO TO ANY KING AND SPALDING OFFICE UNLESS THEY HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE....

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:19 PM

6:31 -- The problem is with the typical law firm hiring calendar. Recruiting committees and practice group leaders are asked to decide -- based on today's workload -- how much additional help will be needed in 2-1/2 years' time.

Those associates starting work this month began as a glimmer in the recruiting committee's eye in Spring 2005, then interviewed as 2Ls in Fall 2005 for summer jobs in 2006, for offers to come to work in 2007.

A lot can happen (economy, firm mergers, loss of a major client, defection of major rainmaker partner, etc.) in that time to change a firm's hiring needs.

avatar
Posted by Class of 2002 | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:23 PM

5:32,
Too many (top) firms to mention. [You must be in law school.]
I was at a Top 10 law school, and I would guess that at least 25%-33% (maybe far more, of the large-firm associates) of my graduating class had either no offer at graduation, was told to come 6 months late, was offered severance not to come, was told not to come (and not offered severance), was told to come late (and then told not to come at all), etc.
I luckily went to a largish regional firm that was not big into tech work, so it weathered the storm better. Everyone at my firm kept their jobs. But I didn't have too much work for a year, and neither did most of classmates who had been lucky enough to keep their jobs.

Everyone eventually landed fairly softly, but it took a long few months for some, and others didn't find Biglaw but never went back. It's certainly a nerve-racking experience to go from an offer with a huge firm to no job at all.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:25 PM

anything in the top 50 or so firms like what was outlined above?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:26 PM

7:06 -- a staff attorney is someone who graduated from law school and passed the bar but is not on the partnership track. You do the work assigned to you by the "real" attorneys (some staff attorneys have a ton of responsibility), but there are no client development expectations and your hours are usually more tolerable.

It's not a bad use of your JD degree if you don't mind being treated as a second-class citizen.

avatar
Posted by BigLaw Summer | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:30 PM

Socially retarded people get through callbacks at firms all the time.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:35 PM

Are staff attorneys paid at BigLaw rates? I was under the impression that they were not and were more like permanent contract attorneys.

avatar
Posted by Average Biglaw Lawyer | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:36 PM

Thank God.

avatar
Posted by Ataslat | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:54 PM

Big surprise that Pillsbury is on the list. the firm itself is a TTT.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 8:59 PM

7:55 - isnt it possible that its not the personality and it could be the firm, like so many other stories are telling us? One summer is not indicative of the next. How is it then that these people go on to get offers at other texas firms they split with that loved their personality?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:04 PM

I lobbied for a couple of no offers in my firm, but we gave them all offers, even the one who was a total freak. I'm told it was soft, but I'll find out in a few months.

We have a hard limit of only one no-offer a year to avoid scaring future summer associates away.

avatar
Posted by West Coast Thelen | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:16 PM

I haven't heard about Thelen NYC, but it's my understanding that on the West Coast, over the past three years, every summer, or, in the smaller offices, every summer "but one" (there's always one, right) in each office's class have received offers. Maybe because the West Coast didn't get the influx of Brown Raysman attorneys, but generally Thelen out west is careful to take only as many summers as they can give offers. And NO I am not a thelen troll, recruter or partner. Just a lowly associate.

avatar
Posted by NALP-alm | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:27 PM

NALP says that Thelen NYC gave 17 offers to 17 summers.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:38 PM

The comment about Hunton in Dallas is credited. They told the summers on their first day that basically they had too many summers because they took on all the Jenkens & Gilchrist students. I imagine it would have been nice for the J&G summers to know that BEFORE they had accepted their Hunton offer.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:46 PM

the NALP forms are from 2006. i think we should petition for updated NALP forms before summer offers start going out. it is really quite deceptive to post updated information after people have already made their decisions.

avatar
Posted by Waiting on bar results... | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 9:55 PM

8:26, Thanks for the information. I assume staff attorneys make less but if the hours are tolerable and the work is interesting, who cares. Especially, since law is second career I was never really thinking partnership track.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 10:00 PM

8:18, I haven't heard any stories of significant no-offering from the DC office of K&S. Have you? It pretty much runs its own hiring operation, separate from Atlanta, so I don't think there's any reason to avoid it.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 10:16 PM

8:03 -- Totally False B.S.

K&S Atlanta gave offers of almost every summer associate, just as in prior years.

Clearly another competitor trying to make havoc because you cannot out-recruit A&B on the merits.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 10:17 PM

Sorry, should have said cannot out-recruit K&S on the merits, you A&B spy.

avatar
Posted by AutoAdmit Sucks | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 10:36 PM

man there is some blatant autoadmit trolling on ATL lately. that place is a cancer.

avatar
Posted by Anon | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 10:53 PM

In the summer of 2002, Weil didn't give offers to 12 of its summers in its NYC office.

avatar
Posted by anonymous | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:02 PM

I heard that Hunton & Williams' Richmond office considered not giving offers to a number of SAs last year. They gave offers to some SAs and then waited a few weeks before telling the others (hoping they would get offers elsewhere and the firm wouldn't get a bad rep for not giving everyone offers).

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:19 PM

Baker's LA office probably no offered its summers because Ballard Spahr acquired several of their top earning partners for its new LA office.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:20 PM

Covington DC made offers to everyone in their summer class.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:23 PM

Are ATL firms other than K&S no-offering?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:36 PM

5:06, the U of C kids are done working at every single firm I know of, firms don't generally let summers stay this far into the next year's recruiting cycle. All the U of C kids at Skadden and Kirkland have offers and are getting ready to go back to school.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Monday, September 10, 2007 11:51 PM

I guess we are beginning to see no-offers as a way for firms to trim the fat off their big summer classes when the economy starts heading bad. If the economy and finance markets continue going downhill, gunners at Tier II schools aren't going to have much luck anymore. Loyola 2L will have company.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:02 AM

11:02, where'd u hear that?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:48 AM

This is a really lame thread - kind of like watching a table full of fat chicks talking about the guys who fucked them in a drunken stupor and blew them off in the morning.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:01 AM

Not sure what motivates the King and Spalding disinformation on this topic, but to set the record straight: this past summer at K&S Atlanta there were 41 summer associates and 40 got offers. (Don't know about Houston, so I can't comment.) Call the recruiting department for confirmation if you wish. But be wary about believe everything you see posted anon. ESPECIALLY IF IT'S IN ALLCAPS.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:20 AM

12:48 -- Well said. Sour grapes for everyone.

avatar
Posted by Just my $.02 | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 1:53 AM

SAs who got good work evaluations but didn't get an offer might want to rethink how they behave socially. Remember that work product isn't everything. Partners also look to see whether you can be trusted to be left alone in a room with a client.

avatar
Posted by Harvey Bidman | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:39 AM

Big Law IP,

Seagate was CAFC (en banc), not Supremes (at least not yet).

avatar
Posted by BigLaw IP | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:22 AM

Harvey, you are wrong if you think the Sup Ct won't grant cert on Seagate. It's as good as denied. Not going to happen. The fed cir is finally getting the clue, thanks to the Roberts court. Bad for the botiques though.

avatar
Posted by BigLaw IP | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:23 AM

I meant you are wrong if you think the cup ct *will* grant cert

damn i'm getting sloppy

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:00 AM

Everything said about King and Spalding Houston on this thread is true.

The place should be avoided if you have options.

I wonder if this drop in offers had anything to do with the raise to 160?

avatar
Posted by ks | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 9:48 AM

the ks info about houston is wrong. the summers that didn't get offers were socially retarded, making racist comments and all sorts of other inappropriate remarks. several of them also really did have awful work product.

geeze, i wonder if the raise to 160 had anything to do with the no offers? hmm, ks partners make more than any other firm in houston (one or two small NY firm exceptions), but you're right, i'm sure it was the raises and not your crappy performance.

and finally, nearly every summer that got an offer has accepted (for those not in texas, generally the acceptance rate in tx is between 33-50%, depending on whether your summers clerked at two or three places).

avatar
Posted by Anonymous | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:00 AM


4:58 - I dont think this is accurate.

avatar
Posted by Chris | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:19 AM

Here is my question, wouldn't it be in the firm's best interest to give no offers rather than cold offers? Isn't there some kind of statistic that measures how many summers that received offers actually took them for each firm? Or is the fact that pretty much every firm is like the other mean that nobody cares about that statistic?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:32 AM

Spencer Fane in KC has a reputation for no-offering about 25% of its class.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 10:47 AM

I've heard two definitions of what a "cold offer" is: one, that the firm makes the offer but tempers it by saying that it would behoove the SA to look elsewhere; two, that the SA doesn't actually have an offer, but the firm will tell places where the SA interviews that it did.

If it's the former and you can't find anything during 3L, there's no harm in showing up for the job, even if you're not wanted. You get the name on your resume, get a paycheck, and leave as soon as you can. You may only get staffed to doc reviews, but who cares? That happens to lots of associates anyway.

avatar
Posted by anon | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:28 AM

10:47 - Very good point! I would also be curious to hear if anyone knows the answer about if you can return after a cold offer. I was under the impression that they "could" come back but were urged not to. So while you may feel like a second class citizen when you return, it may be ok in a really large office. Even so, at least you are getting paid, have it on your resume, and can keep looking while you are working there. Much better in my opinion than joining the ranks of L2L in the unemployment line!

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:35 AM

Fragomen sounds too much like "frogmen" to be a real law firm

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:37 AM

Does anyone know how many WilmerHale (DC) summers got offers? And how many accepted?

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:02 PM

I go to the top ten school where three people go no-offered at K & S Houston and the ones I know are not socially retarded and were specifically told that there work was good. If it wasw bad then the firm should say that and not lie. So either way K&S screwed them.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:16 PM

Fragomen is the 800 lb. gorilla in immigration law, and Austin Fragomen is probably the most well-respected immigration lawyer in the country, but Fragomen isn't like a real law firm, I've always thought if it more like an H&R Block. The partners leverage the processing equipment and paralegals more than associates, so they are not as valued.

avatar
Posted by guest | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:22 PM

Apparently, Kilpatrick Stockton in Atlanta made several "cold offers" or no offers to summers who did great work without any warning...

avatar
Posted by Matt Sanderson | Permalink Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:23 PM

I need to correct the false representations about King & Spalding in Houston. I worked there this last summer, got an offer, but didn't accept (only because I'm interested in a practice area specific to Washington, DC). So I'd like to think that I am an informed and relatively unbiased source of information about K&S-Houston. The fact that I'm willing to put my name on my post should also tell you something about its authenticity.

I can't tell you that EVERYONE who got no-offered was undeserving. But I can tell you that, judging from my interactions with some members of K&S-Houston's summer class, some of the no-offers didn't deserve to get jobs. Their behavior in social settings was bizarre. Their work product was, as they described it, sub-par.

People should have NO concerns whatsoever about summering at K&S-Houston. If you have normal social and work abilities, you should have no problem getting an offer. I had a fantastic and educational time this last summer, and think that K&S-Houston would've been a nice place to start my career.