Year-End Bonus Watch: Boston
Our recent open threads, dedicated to discussion of year-end bonuses in different legal markets, haven't been generating THAT many comments (at least compared to prior open threads). Maybe it's too early for bonus discussion. Or maybe people just aren't expecting much this year, given the recent base salary increases. So this may end up being the last post in the series.
Some of you have requested an open thread for discussion of law firm bonuses in BOSTON. Here you go.
Please discuss Boston bonus policies and expectations, in the comments. Thanks.
Earlier: Year-end bonus open threads for New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, DC.












Comments
second
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:28 PM
first
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:31 PM
Ninth
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:32 PM
What is WilmerHale's bonus policy? Does it vary by office?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:35 PM
12:35 --> who cares about that 3rd tier firm. get a real job
Posted by: Firsty McFirsterson | September 25, 2007 12:38 PM
Lat: please do SF before you close this off!
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:51 PM
Ropes NY matches NYC lockstep bonuses, and then Ropes Boston, CA and D.C. pay $5000 less. Last year was different, though, b/c NY was still being paid $10K more than Boston ($145/135), so the Boston, CA and D.C. offices actually paid $5K MORE to those offices than to NY, to keep the total comp difference at $5K more in NYC. Last year, Ropes Boston 1st years got $40K while Ropes NYC matched market at $35K.
Now that both pay $160K base, Boston should once again be $5K behind in bonus from what Ropes NYC pays. If last year's 1st year level in NYC remains 35, expect 30 in Boston.
It all depends upon the first few NYC firms to announce.
Posted by: Mr. Roper | September 25, 2007 12:56 PM
What about paralegal bonues? My billing rate is only a few dollars less than a first year and I've billed 2100 this year (not including pro bono or bus. dev.).
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 12:56 PM
That's interesting - thanks, Mr. Roper.
A $5K difference between Boston and NYC is pretty negligible (although Boston is an expensive city).
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 01:02 PM
how about something for minneapolis
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 01:27 PM
how about something for minneapolis
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 01:27 PM
how about something for minneapolis
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 01:27 PM
Does anyone know how Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge does their bonuses? Boston is their biggest office so there has to be someone out there that has an idea. Thank you!
Posted by: Booga Booga | September 25, 2007 01:29 PM
1:02
not compared to NYC
Posted by: anonymous | September 25, 2007 01:31 PM
While it would be nice to get the exact same pay as our NYC colleagues, I think Ropes Boston (and CA + D.C.) associates fully realize that the $5K difference in total comp is more than offset by the lower cost of living, absence of city tax, etc.
Posted by: Mr. Roper | September 25, 2007 01:35 PM
Does anyone expect bonuses to be cut in response to the hikes in our base salary?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 02:22 PM
Seconded for SF.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 02:25 PM
bingham?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 02:35 PM
1:35
5k extra in nyc won't even cover the city tax.
NYCers take home less, not to mention cost of living.
Posted by: nyc city tax | September 25, 2007 03:25 PM
how can you say that we don't think bonuses should be big? salaries went up, but not to the degree that our billing rates did. we are expecting at least the same bonus scale this year as last, even more considering it is a boom year.
Posted by: anon | September 25, 2007 03:46 PM
Thanks Lat, for these threads. I'm one who is desperate for bonus info, but don't really have any info to share. Imagine others are in the same boat: We're all curious (or hopeful), and really want our firm to not be below market (some may dare to hope that their firm beats market), but don't know anything.
SFers: Check out the LA thread. I think bonuses across CA are pretty much the same within firms. Of course, no one really knows what any firm is doing -- or if bonuses are affected by the bump in pay -- so that's a bit more problematic. The really interesting wrenches are MoFo, Heller, Bingham and WSGR, all of which supposedly have changed their bonus structure due to salary increases. Whether this will lead to high performing associates at these firms being paid less in total compensation (base + bonus) than associates doing the same amount of work at Orrick, LW, GDC, OMM, and Kirkland remains to be seen.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 04:04 PM
Boston sucks.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 05:14 PM
WilmerHale paid out 30k to first years last year, if I recall. Ropes did 35k.
I *may* be wrong about the actual figures, but that's really close. I do *know* Ropes paid 5k more than WilmerHale.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 06:44 PM
Do smaller markets like Denver, Hartford, or New Jersey pay bonuses??
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 07:19 PM
Goodwin Procter matched NY bonuses last year. Expect roughly the same numbers this year. Won't be announced until Jan. 24, or so.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 08:07 PM
WilmerHale bases bonuses mostly on hours and includes all pro bono hours toward its bonus benchmarks. In rare cases it will bump someone up or down a notch if their work is unusually bad or exceptional. This is WilmerHale's scale for every US office except New York:
1st Years:
$15,000 for 1850
$30,000 for 2000
$35,000 for 2200
$40,000 for 2400
2nd Years:
$15,000 for 1850
$30,000 for 2000
$37,000 for 2200
$45,000 for 2400
3rd Years:
$15,000 for 1850
$35,000 for 2000
$42,000 for 2200
$50,000 for 2400
4th Years:
$15,000 for 1850
$35,000 for 2000
$42,000 for 2200
$50,000 for 2400
5th Year:
$15,000 for 1850
$38,000 for 2000
$45,000 for 2200
$55,000 for 2400
6th Year:
$15,000 for 1850
$40,000 for 2000
$50,000 for 2200
$65,000 for 2400
Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2007 08:59 PM
Boston Biglaw Bonuses = two cups of Legal seafood's clam chowder...
Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2007 09:32 AM
I mean, I know you guys get paid a lot, but working that much SUCKS. Factor in the fact that there is no God, and you have a pretty miserable existence. Ha!
Posted by: Richie Cunningham | September 26, 2007 10:03 AM
Anyone have information on Proskauer's bonuses?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2007 04:06 PM
anyone know about Mintz, Foley Hoag, or Goodwin?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2007 06:31 PM
Any info on Gunderson's bonuses?
Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2007 11:08 PM
Foley Hoag and Choate both require that you hit 2,000 hours before you can make a bonus. I believe that Choate pays 30K once you hit that target. No idea about FH.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 28, 2007 02:42 PM
Proskauer gives associates a percentage of the market bonus based on their billables.
< 1800 hours: 0%
1800-1999: 85%
2000-2299: 100%
2300-2599: 110%
2600+: 115% + 1 week of vacation
Pro bono counts towards billables, but you need to bill 1800 of regular client work before PB can count towards the bonus, i.e. 1799 hours + 50 pro bono = no bonus.
Shadowing time also counts towards billables.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 30, 2007 10:42 PM
What is current market bonus? 30k?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 2, 2007 06:04 PM
Goodwin gave lock-step to junior associates last year, starting at $40,000 for first-years.
Posted by: Anon | October 10, 2007 03:10 PM