Associate Bonus Watch: An Open Call for News and Memos
As we first reported, Cravath, Swaine & Moore has kicked off the 2007 bonus season, with yesterday's announcement of "special" and year-end bonuses for its associates. Here's coverage from the New York Law Journal and the WSJ Law Blog, who actually got Cravath to talk to them. (CSM declined ATL's request for comment.) Both sources credit ATL; we thank Anthony Lin and Peter Lattman for the shout-outs.
This leads us to the second stage of bonus season: waiting for the other shoes to drop. We intend to cover bonus developments as closely as we did last year. If a firm is a Vault 100 or AmLaw 100 law firm, or even if its name rings a vague sort of bell, we want to hear about its bonus announcement.
We can't cover this subject without your help. We need you to let us know, as soon as possible, when your firm makes a bonus announcement. Per ATL standard operating procedure, we will NOT identify you as our source.
Here's how to reach us with bonus news:
1. As you probably already know, you can send bonus news and memos to us by email (subject line: "Associate Bonus Watch: [firm name]".2. To be on the safe side, email us from a non-work email account (but preferably one with your real name, so we can confirm that you actually work where you work, by looking you up on the firm website).
3. To be on the super-safe side, save your email in draft form in your non-work account (e.g., Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.). When you're ready to send, access that account using the web browser in your Blackberry or other wireless device, open the saved draft, and hit "send." (You could also send the message when you get home, but that would take forever.)
4. Another way to contact us: send us a Facebook message. Even if your firm monitors the websites you visit, being on Facebook won't get you in trouble (provided you do it in moderation).
5. Yet another way to reach us: by instant messenger or Gmail chat. If you're a regular ATL tipster, or if you're our Facebook friend, you know where to reach us on AIM and on Gmail chat.
6. Yet another way to reach us: by phone. Many of you have our phone number, which is also listed in our Facebook profile.
As you know, we prefer to have full memos (although we'll take just the numbers if that's all we can get). Please keep your friends at ATL in mind this bonus season, and send us your news ASAP. The project of bringing greater transparency to associate compensation can't work unless you do your part. Thanks!
Cravath First! Let BigLaw’s Associate Bonus Season Begin [WSJ Law Blog]
Cravath to Give Associates Special Bonus Plus Year-End Bonus [New York Law Journal]
Earlier: Cravath Announces Bonuses -- 'Special' and Otherwise!!!












Comments
Lets hope somebody upstages Cravath by making these raises part of base compensation or at least a single bonus.
DPW and STB, we're all looking at you here.
Posted by: stub years want love too | October 30, 2007 12:05 PM
any idea what dla piper chicago bonues are typically?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:09 PM
THIRD!
Posted by: third! | October 30, 2007 12:11 PM
Why should I access my Yahoo email account from my Blackberry rather than my office computer?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:14 PM
12:14
PATRIOT Act
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:16 PM
12:14
PATRIOT Act
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:18 PM
These bonuses are outrageous
Posted by: Cumberland 3L | October 30, 2007 12:19 PM
Cravath is managing expectations. From NYLJ article:
"Cravath's announcement comes against a backdrop of disappointing results and layoffs at Wall Street investment banks. "We've said to people quite explicitly that the business environment is uncertain," said Chesler."
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:21 PM
Cumberland--
its called a market economy. got it??
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:23 PM
12:09, during bonus season the City gets a lot less Windy (i.e. contra NY, the subject of bonuses at Chicago offices is discussed in whispers, if at all).
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 12:25 PM
Or, use tor + privoxy + firefox running off a flash drive.
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 12:28 PM
Lat, will you be my Facebook friend?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:34 PM
seems like dla piper posted bonuses very early last year. any news on this years bonuses?
Posted by: dla | October 30, 2007 12:34 PM
greedy mofos
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:38 PM
Given the MUCH higher bonuses in NY (always have been, always will be), I'd say the tired (though valid) argument regarding the higher cost of living in NY should be put to rest.
Posted by: ChicagoToiler | October 30, 2007 12:42 PM
Nothing is going to be decided in Chicago or other markets until we see where the top NY firms are going.
It seems to be a no-brainer that the top 10-15 NY firms* are going to match dollar for dollar, and it seems similarly unlikely that, beyond an additional 10-20 firms in NY* where some will and some won't (or some will partially), the firms below the top 20-35 NY firms* aren't going to match much or any of the "special bonus."
From there, the way that Chicago, DC and LA firms handle this is going to depend on what the national firms with big presences in NY are going to do. What firms like Latham, Sidley, Kirkland and similar firms do are going to drive the market for the 10-20 national firms who have to compete in NY and who have in the past allowed non-NY associates to get close to or above NY market bonuses with high hours.
There are a lot of firms in Chicago, LA and the Bay Area where you have historically been able to get NY money for 2200-2400 hours. Obviously, places like DLA are not going to match any of the special bonus. The actions of Skadden and Kirkland should be very informative. I think that these firms and maybe places like Sidley and Latham will have to step up and allow well-respected 2300+ billers to get pretty close to the total NY comp, but we'll see.
One thing is for sure, it will be a long and interesting bonus season. Lat just got his holiday bonus in the form of increased ad revenue. Lat to $3.59/1000 ad views!
*Determining who falls into these categories is left as an exercise to the commenters.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:43 PM
My Kirkland Chicago bonus better be at least that of NYC
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:49 PM
FIRST
Posted by: me | October 30, 2007 12:50 PM
Ouch - Lat is getting blacklisted by the firms, but they're willing to talk to Lattman.
Take heart, L2L -- Lattman, a Fordham grad, is scooping Lat, a Yale grad.
Posted by: iNonymous | October 30, 2007 12:51 PM
Another way to save the bonus memo:
Open it up on your computer. hit the print screen button. open up ms paint. hit the paste button. now you have a picture of the memo. there are a million ways other than sending it that you can use to transfer it to another computer, USB keys, floppy drives, cd burner, save a draft e-mail, etc.
Posted by: print screen | October 30, 2007 12:54 PM
12:43, you seem knowledgable about this stuff. Do associates in different Skadden offices get different bonuses? For some reason I figured the people in Houston got the same bonus as those in New York. And do you mean to say Skadden bonuses even in NYC are below market?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:56 PM
Skadden won't be interesting or informative -- whatever Skadden does it does in lock-step across all offices unlike other nationals
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 12:57 PM
*knowledgeable*
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 12:59 PM
Top 10-15 NY firms (not necessarily in this order):
DPW
Simpson
Cleary
Skadden
Latham (?)
Sullivan (already kind of matched, with senior bonus pool)
Wachtell (just to make sure everyone knows they're #1)
Cadwalader (I'd expect them to match)
Debevoise
Weil
Paul Weiss
Expect to match:
Cahill
Clifford Chance
Gibson
Goodwin
Fried Frank
MoFo
Mayer?
Dewey?
K&E (just for the shout-out, they're prob already higher)
Milbank
Shearman
Sidley
Posted by: First crack | October 30, 2007 01:05 PM
Since when did Latham become a NY firm? Branch offices don't count.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:13 PM
Top Chi firms?
Posted by: yalie | October 30, 2007 01:16 PM
Since when did Latham become a NY firm? Branch offices don't count.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:16 PM
12:57, it's only the last year (maybe 2?) that Skadden has been the same across the country. Skadden associates outside of NY got screwed prior to that. I don't think that is was huge, maybe $10-20k less in total comp, but I am sure that some others can comment. (I also recall that Skadden senior associates in NY got slightly less, too, but that may be wrong.)
I don't think Skadden can afford not to match the special bonus in NY, or they will go back to being kind of a dirty secret of lower compensation like they used to be. They would be stupid to let that happen. However, I would be surprised if they really paid all offices these special bonuses. That is going to be very expensive for them.
Also, I should have mentioned that the comment re: number of senior associates in these firms (made in the other thread) is a good one. Places like Skadden have a TON of senior associates (I think, maybe someone can confirm). Places like Cravath and S&C aren't going to have as many (again, please confirm). It's a lot less expensive for some places to give senior associates massive bonuses because natural attrition has already driven them out. Other places, not so much attrition, and you can bet that firms are going to be looking at the number of bodies when they are deciding what to do.
Posted by: 12:43 | October 30, 2007 01:18 PM
wait...CWT...top firm? Since when?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:20 PM
Some firms are national or international firms. It does not matter where their original office was. The top international firms set the market and it does not matter if their first office was in LA, Chicago, DC or NY as that is meaningless nowadays. There are international firms and regional firms. CSM, Skadden, Sullivan, K&E, Latham are all international firms and play in the same field. Talking about branch offices is so 90's and very dated.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:24 PM
Even though PH is not a NY firm, it will match market once it shakes out.
Posted by: Drinking the kool-aid | October 30, 2007 01:25 PM
1:05 -- Goodwin will only match if that's what Ropes & Gray does.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:35 PM
Is Wilmer considered regional or a big enough player to match?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:36 PM
are all of these firms talked about lockstep? I thought some of them (like Latham) are based on billables...
Posted by: ignorant | October 30, 2007 01:40 PM
Cadwalader top 10-15? LOL.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:45 PM
1:20 - See the Cravath thread for that info. CWT isn't as high on Vault (it's in the 30s, I think) but in the AmLaw ratings for RPL/PPP, it's up there with the big boys. That's why AmLaw is a better indicator when it comes to bonuses/raises.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 01:49 PM
1:36, Wilmer is about twice the size of Goodwin and WAY more national than Ropes ever thought about being.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 02:37 PM
1:45/1:49 - CWT = #26 Vault, #4 PPP, IIRC
Posted by: hot librarian | October 30, 2007 02:46 PM
Chicago? Match? LOL!
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 02:53 PM
2:46, they still have bed bugs. 'nough said.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 02:56 PM
I don't care what numbers you give me for CWT. Wait a couple years after the impact of all the defecting partners becomes clear. It's a sinking ship.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 03:12 PM
Defecting partners? Care to englighten?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 03:21 PM
Partners aren't defecting from CWT - They were asked to leave. It's the associates who run like mad on their own volition
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 03:24 PM
"The project of bringing greater transparency to associate compensation"
Ha, you mean the project of driving traffic to your blog. Which is fine, but don't act like it's virtuous or anything...
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 03:56 PM
12:23-
I understand it's the market but I think it is outrageous and nearly sinful that someone who is 26 or 27, a year out of law school making over $200,000 a year.
From what I have found out people at my school will be lucky to make anywhere near that much. It would be more acceptable if firms like Cravath gave half a chance to people like me and others at Cumberland to get a job there.
Posted by: Cumberland 3L | October 30, 2007 04:15 PM
Cumberland 3L
It only seems sinful to you b/c you can't get in. There is a reason schools like yours exist and attorneys from your schools can't get into big firms---and you should appreciate it: normal people need lawyers, too. And honestly, you are what they can afford. Its not a diss, its a reality and be glad that you are in that market--b/c that isn't sensitive to mortgage markets and lock-step pay raise issues which force people out and make us big law associates miserable.
Stop bellyaching about not being able to play with the big boys, you should know by now that it ain't all that its cracked up to be. Its not going to change unless you prove to be an extraordinary attorney, and if you are, you will make more money working for yourself anyway.
Besides, your education didn't cost as much as ours. (If it did, you did some crappy cost benefit analysis and that's your fault, not Cravath's).
Posted by: Anon | October 30, 2007 04:27 PM
Cumberland 3L
It only seems sinful to you b/c you can't get in. There is a reason schools like yours exist and attorneys from your schools can't get into big firms---and you should appreciate it: normal people need lawyers, too. And honestly, you are what they can afford. Its not a diss, its a reality and be glad that you are in that market--b/c that isn't sensitive to mortgage markets and lock-step pay raise issues which force people out and make us big law associates miserable.
Stop bellyaching about not being able to play with the big boys, you should know by now that it ain't all that its cracked up to be. Its not going to change unless you prove to be an extraordinary attorney, and if you are, you will make more money working for yourself anyway.
Besides, your education didn't cost as much as ours. (If it did, you did some crappy cost benefit analysis and that's your fault, not Cravath's).
Posted by: Anon | October 30, 2007 04:28 PM
Cumberland 3L
Get over it! You don't go to a top tier school, it ain't gonna happen. It's not outrageous or sinful that we make 200K---esp considering the fact that most of us have over 120K in law school debt. We have to make that much to justify the expense---and we work our asses off for it, believe me.
If you have that much in debt, than you didnt' do an adequate cost-benefit analysis before you went to school and that's not anyone's fault but your own. you should have known what you were getting yourself into before you signed up to go a 2/3d/4th tier school.
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 04:32 PM
CWT might be a horrible place to work, but it's incredibly profitable and you have to be really good or have a massive book of business to make partner there.
That said, CWT is a powerhouse in structured finance, and structured finance hit a wall sometime around June. I wouldn't be shocked if that showed up in profits.
With all that said, CWT will match. The firm can't offer associates a reasonable shot at partnership or a decent / sustainable lifestyle, but is does offer great exit opportunities and cash. If it skimps on the cash it's associates are going to jump on the exit opportunities.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 04:32 PM
Cumberland 3L
Get over it! You don't go to a top tier school, it ain't gonna happen. It's not outrageous or sinful that we make 200K---esp considering the fact that most of us have over 120K in law school debt. We have to make that much to justify the expense---and we work our asses off for it, believe me.
If you have that much in debt, than you didnt' do an adequate cost-benefit analysis before you went to school and that's not anyone's fault but your own. you should have known what you were getting yourself into before you signed up to go a 2/3d/4th tier school.
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 04:32 PM
Cumberland 3L
Get over it! You don't go to a top tier school, it ain't gonna happen. It's not outrageous or sinful that we make 200K---esp considering the fact that most of us have over 120K in law school debt. We have to make that much to justify the expense---and we work our asses off for it, believe me.
If you have that much in debt, than you didnt' do an adequate cost-benefit analysis before you went to school and that's not anyone's fault but your own. you should have known what you were getting yourself into before you signed up to go a 2/3d/4th tier school.
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 04:32 PM
can we please stop the double and triple posting
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 04:36 PM
Cumberland 3L - I will be happy to give a shit what you think is sinful as soon as you offer me a special bonus for doing so.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 04:38 PM
4:27 -
So which structured finance specialty firm do you work for?
Thatcher, Mckee?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 04:51 PM
Associates running like mad? Where do you people come up with this nonsense - I have two friends that work at CWT and this is not the case - certainly no more drop off than other firms its size. Seems as if you have all this time on your hands to do non work related things such as spending time circulating false information - all the while, sitting by angrily wanting to know how much more your firms should be paying you to do such. What a joke.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 04:52 PM
Cumberland,
Please advise me why it is "sinful" to make a lot of money, whether young or old. Are you one of those judgmental a-holes who call people like me a workaholic while secretly wishing you were driving my SL500?
Posted by: Response to CL | October 30, 2007 05:09 PM
2:53 - Guess you don't work for Kirkland or Skadden.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 05:10 PM
Somebody should really respond to Cumberland 3L.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 05:42 PM
Cumberland 3L and Loyola 2L (now a 3L but kept his name) should start their own firm upon graduation:
Cumberland & Loyola LLP to $0 + a box of tissue for their tears!
Posted by: cry me a river | October 30, 2007 06:29 PM
Go easy on the Cumberland dude. The head of SRZ's real estate group, Jeff Lenobel, is a Cumberland grad -- he did ok for himself.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 06:36 PM
C3L -
Are you some kind of fucking communist?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 06:41 PM
Does anybody here have a set of balls?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 06:48 PM
6:36 - since when is SRZ is good firm?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 06:56 PM
Look, I never went into law school expecting to make 200k after graduation because I am not willing to work in a place like New York or Washginton. I'd be willing to take a job in Atlanta but even that is a little too busy for me.
My ideal job would be 9AM to 5PM doing work where I don't have to go into court that much and occasionally really get to help some people out. I would also ocassionaly like to knock off work at noon. However, I don't think I should go broke having a job like that, which is why these bonuses are wrong.
I am going to come out of law school over $100k in debt. I'm in the top 20% of my class. I think these bonuses are outrageous and sinful because someone like me who wants to help people will be lucky to make as much as some of these bonuses. Furthermore, someone in their mid 20s already making $160,000 don't need another $40,000.
Posted by: Cumberland 3L | October 30, 2007 06:58 PM
6:56 - granted SRZ is not a top firm (though they are at the top of the pay scale -- does anybody know where they are in PPP?), but Lenobel is one of the top RE rainmakers in NYC. Have to agree with 6:36 here -- that Cumberland boy did alright.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 07:03 PM
Working 9-5 where you get to knock off work at noon and you don't think you should go broke having a job like that. You won't go broke, if you learn to live on minimum wage, which is what a job like that often pays.
Someone in their mid 20s making $160,000 needs another $40,000 if that person happens to have $150k in student loans. And, believe you me, I pay for every cent with my sweat and blood.
Posted by: Anon3 | October 30, 2007 07:13 PM
Cumberland -
Leave us alone you middle class fuck
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 07:16 PM
compared to what hedge fund or PE guys are getting, big law bonuses look modest at best...
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 07:25 PM
CWT will match, it is a big player money-wise. Its PPP are higher than a lot of top Vault firms. Really, it isn't even that bad a place to work, at least not in certain groups. Structured finance may have slowed down a little bit, but everyone is still really busy, and the unbelievable pace of the first 7 months of the year will make up for the slower 4Q. Not to mention the three HUGE (upwards of 20 billion deals) closing at the end of Oct, beginning of Nov.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 07:40 PM
I can't believe you guys have not figured out that Cumberland 3L is just trolling. Stop it, people!
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 08:14 PM
I hope CWT matches the bonus, which I suspect they will. This thread was atypically light on CWT bashing. I work there and think it's a great place. I don't get all the bashing - it's equally strange and pathetic.
Posted by: anon | October 30, 2007 09:01 PM
CWT will match ... most of the major NY based firms with $1 mil+ PPP will match. It'll be interesting to see where the line is drawn, however.
I think given that it is considered to be a one-year thing, though, most of NY biglaw will match. I was surprised not to see any come down the pipe today, but by the end of the week I'm sure we won't be disappointed.
Posted by: Anon | October 30, 2007 09:14 PM
I will go ahead and speak for most of my friends here -- Cumberland 3L is an idiot!! We work just as hard to get into lawschool and in lawschool as everyone in biglaw. Just because we didn't make a 175 on a 1 day test doesn't mean we aren't cut out for biglaw or don't desire to make more money than these retards in birmingham offer us. I am not looking for a job working 35 hours a week. I am looking to make as much bank as I can, as fast as I can.
Moreover, who says we can't get into biglaw. Sure, it isn't the path that most grads from here are on, but it can happen. I sent resumes all over the country this summer and landed 4 office interviews and 2 job offers to top 100 firms. Rankings are important, sure, but don't be surprised when you see someone other than a tier 1 greedy-f#ck in your summer class next year!
Posted by: Cumberland 2L - Don't judge us all by Cumberland 3L! | October 30, 2007 09:20 PM
if you're not from a top tier school, it helps to be an attractive girl...so i hear
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 11:16 PM
Cumberland? Where the fuck is that? If you're going to go to law school, at least pick one that people have heard of. i.e. not some cucumber/never never land hybrid that sounds like a kiddies playground.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 30, 2007 11:19 PM
Cumberland 3L, it's called economics. Perhaps you should study up, since you borrowed over $100k in debt to finance a 9-5 career. You may think that the bonuses are "sinful," but it's what the market will pay people who are billing 2100+ hours a year. Period. I'm 29, making $200k/year, and I'll take every extra penny that my firm wants to give me, without the guilt trip please.
Posted by: economics 101 | October 31, 2007 01:06 AM
Sinful! Ha, I love it. Yes, perhaps it is. But enjoy it while you can, kiddies... when Hillary, Nancy, and (most importantly) Charlie take over in '09, the good times will officially be over. The taxman is a'comin.
Posted by: DaGooch | October 31, 2007 01:43 AM
Cumberland 2L & 3L -
why don't you get the fuck off this board and go back to calling each other the n-word on your school's westlaw TWEN site
Posted by: Anonymous | October 31, 2007 01:44 AM
2:37...Wilmer has about 150 lawyers more than Goodwin, not quite "twice as big"
Posted by: Anonymous | October 31, 2007 08:17 AM
C3L- Biglaw associates work at least 3 tiems as many hours as you just said you plan on working, so why shouldn't they make at least 3x what you will? Never mind they were top of their class and went to top-tier schools, which should bump them up to deserving about 5-6x what you'll make. They earn every penny- and do so by living a largely miserable existence. Don't be a hater.
Posted by: Anonymous | October 31, 2007 08:45 AM