Judge of the Day: William Sosnay
Dressing up for court shouldn't be hard. Dark suit, white shirt, and appropriate neckwear.
But what constitutes appropriate neckwear? From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (via How Appealing):
Justice may be blind, but Milwaukee County Circuit Judge William Sosnay's sense of courtroom fashion is not.In the courtroom of the pompadoured judge long known as a fastidious dresser, a sentencing hearing in a misdemeanor case was delayed for three hours Tuesday after a veteran prosecutor turned up for court wearing an ascot.
A courthouse rule requires all lawyers to wear neckties, but prosecutor Warren Zier's occasional choice of creative cravats drew the judge's ire.
One haberdasher, contacted by the newspaper, respectfully dissented:
"Really?" Bob Norris, manager of Harleys for Men haberdashery in Shorewood, said by phone when told of the courthouse happenings. "Ascots aren't worn very much but would be considered formal."The silk neck loop, worn under the shirt around the base of the neck, is an unusual touch, Norris said, a wardrobe choice one might wear to a fancy dinner party. Hugh Hefner has worn them for decades....
Ah, but maybe prosecutors don't want to take fashion cues from a porn publisher.
What's your view? Was the judge ridiculous for flipping out over an ascot? Or was the prosecutor ridiculous for wearing one?
Post a comment, and take our fashion poll, after the jump.
Update: We see that Peter Lattman, who's obsessed with neckwear, beat us to this story by 15 minutes. Read the WSJ Law Blog post over here.
Not-so-natty neckwear raises judge's hackles [Milwaukee Journal Sentinel via How Appealing]
The Law Blog Ascot Society!? [WSJ Law Blog]












Comments
and...he's fat.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:01 PM
WOO HOO!
Posted by: gah!!! FIRST | January 9, 2008 04:02 PM
first to type "first!"
Posted by: first | January 9, 2008 04:03 PM
What an asshat for wearing an ascot
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:03 PM
He looks more like a pimp than a prosecutor.
Posted by: anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:04 PM
You forgot "Who gives a sh*t" in the poll.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:05 PM
I only wear an ascot while making sweet sweet love.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:05 PM
I had to look up what an ascot is.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:07 PM
If a female lawyer can wear a scarf around her shoulders, then this guy should be allowed to wear an ascot.
Posted by: A.Non.E.Mous | January 9, 2008 04:10 PM
Dick Deguerin says, "If you're going to go to court, look like a lawyer." -- not some pompous jackass.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:11 PM
Guys in Washington, D.C. used to try stand out by wearing pompous neckware all the time. It was no big deal.
Posted by: DC Stud | January 9, 2008 04:12 PM
Who does he think he is Lex Luther?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:13 PM
An ascot seems like evening/socially formal attire rather than courtroom appropriate. But I've only ever seen them paired with a coat with tails (wedding party attire).
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:14 PM
If a female lawyer can wear a scarf around her shoulders, then this guy should be allowed to wear an ascot.
Posted by: A.Non.E.Mous | January 9, 2008 04:10 PM
By that logic a male prosecutor should be able to wear a skirt to court as well?
Asshat.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:14 PM
doesn't an ascot count as a "necktie"?
what about those things that southern lawyers wear that's basically a rope?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:18 PM
the ascot is the finest choice in cravat. It takes a strong, confident man to pull of this look, but it is dashing. Think Cary Grant, Thurston Howell III, George Hamilton.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:21 PM
of course the judge was right to flip out. the superficialities of law -- like lawyers in suits or judges in robes or high ceilings in courtrooms -- are the only things that give law its legitimacy.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:22 PM
""If you're going to go to court, look like a lawyer." -- not some pompous jackass. "
How can you tell the difference?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:25 PM
Guys in my high school used to wear ascots to court all the time, it was no big deal.
Posted by: FRAT STUD | January 9, 2008 04:25 PM
4:14
Don't be dense. Skirts on women is proper business attire. Scarf around the shoulders is a deviation from proper women's business attire. The commenter was saying that if that deviation is tolerated, then the ascot should be tolerated as a slight deviation from proper men's business attire.
You're not very good at this "logic" thing.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:26 PM
Why is scarf on woman a deviation from proper attire? And around the shoulders? I'm not really sure what that is. The little silk scarves tied around the neck seems like the feminine version of a necktie.
Re southern lawyers - no, the rope is not proper courtroom attire. Do they really wear those to court?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:29 PM
He should have worn a neckerchief instead.
Posted by: boy scout 3L | January 9, 2008 04:29 PM
He should have worn an ascot made by Efthymios.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:32 PM
So you can wear an ascot to a formal dinner party, does that mean you can wear a tux to court? How about a kilt?
Posted by: County Kent | January 9, 2008 04:32 PM
what about jockstrap over pantaloons...would that be proper court attire?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:35 PM
To 4:18--Especially when it's worn with a clasp that looks like a cow skull.
Posted by: Don't diss the Bolo Tie | January 9, 2008 04:35 PM
No one should wear an ascot, ever, anywhere, for any reason. End of the issue.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:37 PM
"doesn't an ascot count as a "necktie"?"
No, but it does count as revolting.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:40 PM
Hey Lat,
Playboy is not pornography, asshat.
Posted by: Anon | January 9, 2008 04:47 PM
I believe the southern rope thing is called a bolo tie
Posted by: anon | January 9, 2008 04:49 PM
Reading the WSJ post, it sounds like the judge was more upset by the fact that he told this same prosecutor in the past to wear neckties and he refused to do so when appearing before the judge (though he would wear a necktie in front of a jury). It seems silly for the judge to care about an ascot, but it is not as silly for the judge to care about an attorney's decision to ignore the court's directives.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 04:52 PM
unless you are (1) a prince of the realm (2) the heir to an estate over $1B or (3) going to a costume party, an ascot is an absolute FASHION FAUX PAS.
Posted by: fashion po-lice | January 9, 2008 04:58 PM
"Are you mockin' me with that outfit?"
"No, judge, I'm not mocking you."
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:00 PM
I've worn a cravat. The judge flipped.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:00 PM
Give fatty a break. How could he possibly button that collar? And any silk necktie would be instantly ruined by the rubbing of the stubble and sweat on his neck flabby neck skin against the delicate silk. He probably has on suspenders, elastic waist pants and velcro shoes, too. This is all about discrimination against fatties who cannot reasonably be expected to fit into non-fatty clothes.
The judge could be a total hypocrite. I bet he had on a black flowing robe -- figure camoflaging -- and God knows what, if anything, the judge was wearing under that robe.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:03 PM
Hilarious. I hate neckties anyway - nothing like wearing a tiny noose around one's neck.
I'll take a bolo tie any day, especially one with a cow skull and/or turquoise stones on it.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:06 PM
Only the Solicitor General should be able to get away with wearing anything resembling morning dress to a court appearance. Otherwise the wearer looks like an asshat and/or an escapee from an expensive, elaborately-staged wedding.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:09 PM
Frankly, I don't see what the problem is.
Posted by: Charles Nelson Reilly | January 9, 2008 05:14 PM
I agree with a prior poster that he is an "asshat" for wearing an ascot to court, but the judge is a bigger "asshat" for the way the situation was handled.
A good natured comment, like "forget your tie today Mr. Zie?" or other humorous retort could have conveyed the message without blowing things out f proportion--in other words making a national news story out of it.
When I was a young lawyer SF L & M judge Ira Brown (a tyrant) was notorious for upbraiding lawyers during the rainy season for wearing a rain coat to the podium. But a three hour lecture is a little anal retentive.
“This is an issue which I believe deals with the integrity of the court.", the judge claimed.
No, this is an issue which deals with the mental stability of the court.
Now, about the missing strawberries....
Posted by: Lt. Cmdr. Philip Francis Queeg, USN | January 9, 2008 05:26 PM
Seriously, how do you let yourself get that fat? At some point -- perhaps when the gullet that was once your chin droops down to the upper chest region -- don't you realize that it's time to get some exercise?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:37 PM
Part of the problem is that he's wearing his ascot too tight. He's got it cinched in there like an undershirt. It needs to poof out a little more to be truly pompous.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 05:50 PM
I rarely go to the yacht club without an ascot, blazer and a pair of crisply pressed trousers (skin always healthily tanned) Guys that hate on the ascot don't have the testicular fortitude to dazzle women with a little silk around the color. I own several ascots and I look incredible wearing one.
Pasty faced lawyers are bound to criticize the ascot wearing class, because lawyers are generally risk-averse, terrible dressers with bad skin who suffer from self-esteem and self-confidence issues.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 06:12 PM
Women dig my ties because they are nothing more than large arrows drawing their eyes to my package.
Posted by: Hung Juror | January 9, 2008 06:14 PM
5:37, when one day you cross over the line from jackass to obese, I hope you will remember the hillarious comment you posted today
Posted by: anon | January 9, 2008 06:42 PM
I once wore a merkin in court. It did not go over well. Maybe I should have worn it inside my pants.
Posted by: lastagain | January 9, 2008 06:46 PM
Bolo-tie = Cowboys
Ascots = Ninja
Four-in-hand knot on leather tie = Pirate
Sarong = Indian
Suri = TomKat baby
Double windsor = white shoe firm
Braided Chest/Neck Hair = Priceless!
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 06:49 PM
I captured the penguin. He was wearing an ascot at the time.
Posted by: Batman | January 9, 2008 06:52 PM
I suspect the argument went on for some time:
Judge: "What is that?" (pointing to attorney)
Attorney: My Neck?
Judge: No, around your neck.
Attorney: My other neck? Oh, my double chin?
Judge: No above that.
Attorney: My goatee?
Judge: NO! Below that.
Attorney: OH! My ascot.
Judge: Your "ass-cot"?
Attorney: AS-cot, It is a formal tie alternative.
Judge: looks more like a neck hammock to me.
Attorney: Excuse me?! Are you calling me fat?
Judge: You are obviously fat, I was merely highlighting your contemptable choice in neckwear.
Attorney: Are you telling me how to dress?
Judge: Watch your tone, counselor or you will be wearing a noose.
Attorney: You will be wearing a pearl necklace, judge!
Judge: ORDER! ORDER!
and on and on...
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 06:54 PM
I wore a pearl necklace to court...
Posted by: linda lovelace | January 9, 2008 07:03 PM
Double Windsor = no such thing
There is the Windsor and the half Windsor. I gentleman slap anyone I hear using the term "double Windsor".
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2008 07:12 PM
"Ah, but maybe prosecutors don't want to take fashion cues from a porn publisher."
Or from Melvin Belli.
Posted by: S.F. Poster | January 9, 2008 09:06 PM
An ascot is officially a form of tie. This judge is an ass.
Posted by: anon fashion lawyer | January 9, 2008 09:34 PM
I think that 4:32 has it right. Is an ascot formal neckwear? Yes. Is it appropriate for court? No. Black tie (or white tie for that matter) is formal wear, but would not be appropriate for a court appearance. (see the film, Fracture).
Posted by: Anon | January 10, 2008 09:09 AM
I've researched this issue thoroughly by reviewing all of the postings to date. I have this comment:
4:21... is gay
5:03... almost won
6:12... is scary gay and far gayer than 4:21
6:54... wins hands down!
Posted by: fully briefed | January 10, 2008 09:29 AM
9:29 probably doesn't even know how to sail.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2008 09:41 AM
When you have three hot, blonde girlfriends and have banged every playmate since 1975, you have earned the right to wear whatever the fuck you want.
Posted by: Hugh Hefner | January 10, 2008 09:54 AM
9:41... is that an acknowledgment that you are, in fact, 6:12 and gay? If so, it's cool, guys in my high school used to get on their sailfishes while wearing ascots and bang each other on the lake all the time, it was no big deal.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2008 10:10 AM
9:41... is that an acknowledgment that you are, in fact, 6:12 and gay? If so, it's cool, guys in my high school used to get on their sunishes while wearing ascots and bang each other on the lake all the time, it was no big deal.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2008 10:11 AM
What about the defendant in this case... could you imagine sitting there three hours while the prosecutor and judge argue about the technical differences between an ascot and a tie!?
Is it ok to wear a tie under your ascot? Is everyone then happy?
Posted by: Anonymous | January 10, 2008 10:14 AM
If the judge says "don't wear the ascot in my court" then don't wear the ascot. It's a matter of respect for the bench.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 11, 2008 11:34 AM
what regulatory body determines whether or not an ascot is an "officially" a form of tie, 9:34?
Posted by: TJ McDrinky | January 11, 2008 02:54 PM
what regulatory body determines whether or not an ascot is an "officially" a form of tie, 9:34?
Posted by: TJ McDrinky | January 11, 2008 02:58 PM
you snobby pompous Yankees really do think we all run around in bolo ties and cowboy boots, don't you? Get real.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 14, 2008 02:06 PM
"If the judge says "don't wear the ascot in my court" then don't wear the ascot. It's a matter of respect for the bench."
What if the judge tells you to be his prank monkey? Gotta respect the bench.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 14, 2008 03:10 PM