Clerks in Paradise? Maybe Not When It Comes To Hiring
Some people clerk for the experience. And some people clerk for the experience. From an interesting article entitled "Clerks in Paradise," which appeared in last month's American Lawyer:
[Some go clerk for feeder judges, and some go clerk for] courts in the Northern Mariana Islands, the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia and other tropical locales in the Pacific Ocean. These former United Nations trust territories have legal systems similar to those of the United States, and appeals from their courts traditionally lie with U.S. courts. Many of these territories invite American law graduates to spend a year or two working in their courts as clerks and counsel.The pull of the Pacific can be powerful.
When Timothy Schimpf accepted a position as court counsel in Palau, a nation of more than 300 islands that became independent in 1994, he turned down a permanent job as a trademark attorney with the federal government. "It's absolutely worth it to take a chance and go do something outlandish," he says.
The $40,000 salary he earned in Palau wouldn't go far in America, but life in the Pacific Islands had its perks. From Schimpf's government-provided beachfront housing, after-work swims and kayak sessions were easy.
Sounds like a pretty sweet gig. Read more -- about clerking in paradise, and about the current job market for law clerks applying to large law firms -- after the jump.
Another tale of clerking in the tropics:
[W]hat about adjusting from lagoon to big-firm life? That was the challenge for McDermott Will & Emery Chicago associate Michael Weaver, who spent last year as a law clerk at the High Court of American Samoa. The biggest source of culture shock? "Business casual in American Samoa is a little different," Weaver says. He wore sandals and a polo shirt to work every day except on Fridays. That's when judges and litigants donned traditional Samoan skirts, called lavalavas, and Aloha shirts -- what mainlanders call Hawaiian shirts. Stylish, perhaps, but a little impractical when the winter wind comes whipping off Lake Michigan.With applications coming due over the next few months, aspiring clerks will be fueled by tropical daydreams as they compose résumés, track down recommendations and draft writing samples.
If you think "clerking in paradise" might be for you, contact information for Pacific Island clerkship coordinators appears at the end of this article.
Meanwhile, back on the mainland, there's anecdotal evidence suggesting that the Biglaw job market for judicial law clerks -- usually highly sought after by firms, and wooed with ever-increasing clerkship bonuses -- may be softening. In our open thread on law clerk hiring, this comment was representative:
I wonder if the current perilous state of law firm economics is hurting the market for clerks. Rumblings are that it might be... i.e., "we just aren't looking to bring on that much talent, even if it clerked, since we don't have any work for the people we already have on payroll."
Some anecdotal evidence to that effect, from tipsters:
My former firm recently informed me that they would not hire me when my clerkship ends in August. I spent one year in the New York office of a large national firm upon graduation, and am currently a district court clerk in Boston. I had kept in touch with various partners at the firm over the past few months, thinking I would return.But when I asked about rejoining the firm in January, I was told by the head of litigation that they would not be hiring associates in "my position" seven months hence. So much for loyalty!
Accord:
A certain large New York law firm is not hiring any law clerks this year, despite having held a clerks' reception a few weeks ago. Sources at the firm have confirmed that they are in fact not hiring, and that [the form email letter I received] is not just a polite rejection letter.I find this a little odd, since they seemed interested in soliciting applications at their clerks' reception (which was held after the usual deadline for summers to accept offers). Perhaps a sign of a business slowdown?
Finally, one current law clerk -- someone who already graduated from law school, and who applied for permanent employment at the firm after her clerkship -- received this somewhat inept rejection message from Baker & Hostetler:
Dear Ms. X:Thank you for your interest in Baker & Hostetler LLP. Although we were impressed with your qualifications, we regret to advise you that we were unable to offer you an interview for our summer associate program.
We appreciate your interest in Baker & Hotstetler LLP and wish you every success as you further pursue your legal studies.
Sincerely,
Human Resources Manager
So which firms are still seeking clerks to join their ranks? If you know, feel free to mention them in the comments.
Clerks in Paradise [American Lawyer]
Earlier: Law Clerk Recruiting: Open Thread












Comments
Are there any courts near the Blue Lagoon?
Posted by: Anon | February 9, 2008 12:51 PM
Holland & Knight NY is NOT hiring any law clerks either. And they have a pretty large lit practice, so... Bummer.
Is old standby Jacoby & Meyers taking clerks this year?
Posted by: Mariah Denfert | February 9, 2008 01:32 PM
maybe they don't want to pay 50k sign-on bonuses?
Posted by: attorney | February 9, 2008 01:46 PM
I've gotten a similar reaction from firms in some of the midlevel markets and am concerned that I will run into the same issues in DC. Is the DC market soft for law clerks?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 01:52 PM
No surprise. There are risks to clerking, especially in this economy.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 01:57 PM
Chicago is soft. Kirkland and Winston are hiring clerks though.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 02:09 PM
Is HRC trying to use this whole "pimping" controversy as free publicity? Is she "pimping" the fact that she got called for "pimping" Chelsea?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 02:13 PM
Wow. Baker & Hostetler really sucks. Not only do they no-offer a high number of their summer associates, but they can't even send out the right rejection letters to people. What an inept firm.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 02:40 PM
Its a buyer's market out there. I've had trouble in DC and NY, even from a top 10 law school, and a prestigious district court.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 02:42 PM
I guess you could always clerk for another year, and hope the market looks rosier when you finish.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 03:20 PM
2:13 PM
Take the political warfare elsewhere. Or experiment with what happens when you refer to the children of important clients being "pimped" in a public communication coming out of your office.
Either would be acceptable course of action for you.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 03:26 PM
How do firms view career clerks? Similar bonus structure as term clerks? Do you get credit for the number of years clerking when you move into private practice (like moving up to a 5th year, etc.)?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 04:14 PM
I'll be clerking from 2008-2009. I have an offer from the firm where I summered. I'm in litigation. Should I be worried?
What steps should I take to ensure that I have a job upon completion of my clerkship?
Any advice is welcome.
Posted by: 3l to law clerk | February 9, 2008 04:15 PM
I'm a current COA clerk. My co-clerks and I have received unsolicited info from latham, jones day, keker and van nest, patterson bellknap, and a couple of the large firms in our circuit. I haven't contacted any of those firms, but I assume that they are hiring clerks, given the "effort" of contacting us. Anecdotally, I have heard of some folks struggling to get traction with their applications. I had hoped that this was based on firms being slow to determine their hiring needs for the coming year, but I'm starting to think that the economic downturn is really putting a crimp in the clerk hiring situation. I don't think clerks who are still looking for permanent employment should begin to panic, but I do think we may need to adjust our expectations a bit, and realize that it isn't the clerk-friendly environment that has existed in the past.
3:20 - too late to line up another clerkship for next year...those slots were filled in the fall.
For 3L to law clerk, my advice would be to accept your offer now, if your judge permits you to.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 04:27 PM
Federal clerkships are the new lower third of the class.
Posted by: Anon | February 9, 2008 04:49 PM
That Baker & Hostetler letter looks familiar...
Oh, that's right, I got the same one.
Posted by: Dinged 1L | February 9, 2008 05:03 PM
I wonder if bankruptcy practices are still hiring bankruptcy clerks even if general lit isn't? I'd certainly think so.
Posted by: Anon | February 9, 2008 05:38 PM
Be thankful you were spared Dinged 1L. Baker Hostetler is a shithole.
Posted by: Former Baker Hostetler Associate | February 9, 2008 05:46 PM
I don't suppose those Pacific clerkships trigger the clerkship bonuses from most firms?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 05:52 PM
I'm a current clerk and I have lowered my expectations. I'd even consider Baker Hostetler. My co-clerk and I have received unsolicited brochures from Keker, Quinn, and a few others. Anyone know of other CA firms looking for clerks?
Posted by: Lowered Expectations | February 9, 2008 05:56 PM
I'm a current district court clerk and just finished finding a job in CA (in a non-Los Angeles market). I found a job but it was tighter than expected, and I was told by several prominent CA based firms that the office I had applied to was not hiring at the moment. Then again maybe I jumped the gun and applied too early?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 06:03 PM
I am clerking for a judge on Washington State's Supreme Court. It might just be that Seattle's economy is shrugging off much of the downturn of the rest of the country, but I had no problem finding firms in Seattle looking to hire.
Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2008 07:09 PM
hey guys -- I wouldn't put much stock in those "unsolicited brochures" from law firms. It's a form of marketing. Doesn't mean they actually plan to hire a set number of clerks at the time they send those out.
Posted by: CaliBigLaw | February 9, 2008 07:16 PM
I thought clerking was supposed to help your job prospects?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 07:36 PM
Ditto, CaliBigLaw.
Kellogg Huber sent me and my CoA co-clerks fancy brochures inviting us to apply and then didn't even acknowledge receipt of resumes.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 07:37 PM
7:36, having a clerkship on your resume definitely helps. But, with the downturn in the economy, firms are hiring very conservatively (if at all). Best of luck with your search.
Posted by: CaliBigLaw | February 9, 2008 07:46 PM
I'm clerking in a fed. district court in Texas and looking in Houston. It has been slow thus far. Anyone else with some thoughts on clerk hiring in Houston (or Dallas for that matter)?
Posted by: Tex. clerk | February 9, 2008 08:23 PM
In response to 5:38, a friend is currently clerking for the bankruptcy court, she had several offers (I think everywhere she interview with)
Posted by: anonymous | February 9, 2008 08:33 PM
I would presume your best bet will always be in the judicial district where you clerk. Firms will want someone with experience before the judges that handle their cases. I'm in a large county with only five judges, and I've heard back from some highly selective firms in that area.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 09:12 PM
Huh. I clerked N.D. Cal. last year, and applied to firms in SF this time last year (think KVN, QE, MoFo, Heller, OMM, Orrick, etc.) - 6 of the 7 I sent applications to called within two weeks, and I felt I had my choice of the SF market (graduated T3 school, summered V5 law firm). I haven't heard anything about the above-named SF offices NOT hiring, but I haven't been paying attention since it's no longer relevant. It'd be sad if the market for clerks had dried up in the past eleven months. Good luck to all the clerks looking!
Posted by: Anonymous | February 9, 2008 10:20 PM
I graduated from a top law school, clerked on federal district court, and am clerking on the court of appeals. I have had very little response from firms in the D.C. area even those that sent out marketing material.
Posted by: COA | February 10, 2008 12:31 AM
Considering how firms are reluctant to hire clerks, should 2L summer associates be worried about receiving job offers at the end of the summer?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 06:54 AM
I'm also a CoA clerk and have had no luck in DC, although I have put in my cover letter that I have an interest in the firm's appellate group. My sense is that DC firms are not hiring clerks at all to do appellate work. But I don't really have any desire to work at a firm unless I can do appellate work. If I can't do appellate work at a firm, I'm happy to go work at a non-profit or for the Government instead.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 12:52 PM
From what I hear, clerks from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the patent court) are still in big demand - and they get $100K signing bonuses from a number of firms. Has anyone heard of a downturn in the Fed Circuit hiring market?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 01:01 PM
to 6:54: Yes, you should be very worried. This is direct evidence that 2L summer associates will NOT be getting guaranteed offers this year. The firms clearly expect the economy to be slow in 2009, and will not be hiring everyone like in previous years.
Really sucks to be a 2L summer this year...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 01:07 PM
I think 2Ls will still be fine since they won't be starting until the fall of 2009 unlike clerks starting this fall. Firms will need cheap labor when work picks back up.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 01:32 PM
2L's will NOT be fine! Nobody knows when -- if ever -- the economy will pick up again. The firms will be very cautious and will be forced to cut back on offers.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 01:45 PM
1:07: What about 3Ls who will be starting in the fall? Any risk that their jobs will no longer be there when the fall rolls around?
Posted by: Anon | February 10, 2008 02:27 PM
1:07: what is the evidence you speak of?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 02:49 PM
4:15 - I would recommend you think VERY carefully about clerking. If your clership is not that prestigious (eg in a circuit court or similar level for different fields or the Supremes obviously), I would recommend that you forgo it...My firm has rescinded offers to 3 clerks who had offers upon graduation but decided to go for a clerkship...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 03:13 PM
3:13 can you give a vault range or market? This really surprises me that even federal clerks from top schools had trouble getting offers. I still think midlevels have much more to worry about than 2Ls though.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 03:24 PM
To 12:52 -- DC appellate practices are hiring. Not sure how widely, but they're definitely interviewing (at least COA 2/9/DC clerks).
From what I've heard, though, Latham DC is pretty much done and won't be hiring any new clerks.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 04:21 PM
Clerks,
Chill out. It is early. If you have strong credentials (top 10), you will have a good job lined up by the time you end your clerkship.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 04:26 PM
2:49: The evidence is all around us. The economy is tanking, and the firms were not on top of things when they were hiring for this summer. The summer classes are MASSIVE this year, because the firms did not anticipate the slowdown when they were hiring in the fall.
The fact that they aren't even interviewing clerks is further proof that the firms are in bad shape financially.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 04:26 PM
so what about the prospects of firm hiring for summer 2009?
Should I (a 1L at a top10) be extremely worried?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:04 PM
5:04-- nobody knows. Any advice you get on that would be a wild guess. So all you can do right now is sit tight and try to get great grades. The firms will not stop hiring any summers/entry level people, so don't freak out.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:19 PM
Clerks-- the DC market is tough for everyone. Almost EVERYONE went to top 10 schools, had top grades, and did prestigious internships/clerkships. You might just be a little too late to the table this year. Maybe try looking at smaller markets?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:23 PM
DC sucks. Go to another market.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:31 PM
I think 5:23 and other folks are overstating things. Yes, it might be harder for clerks to get jobs this year than it has been in the past, but I bet clerks will still be better off than non-clerks. I wouldn't take the advice of anyone telling you NOT to clerk for this reason.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:33 PM
5:23: Clerkships and internships are very different.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 05:45 PM
If things are really tanking why are they giving even bigger clerkship bonuses? And raising salaries in smaller markets? This is confusing...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 07:53 PM
I haven't heard a satisfying answer to the old (and documented) adage that as the economy worsens, litigation goes up, because companies are more likely to break contracts.
Could it be that the people who aren't finding jobs are flukes? (Or that the people who are most likely to read post like this, and to post comments, are those who are having trouble finding jobs, for whatever reason?) Are these people looking for jobs in transactional departments?
I just find it a little hard to swallow that it's tough to find a job as a law clerk. This is, all other things being equal, the very best of the candidate pool. I can't imagine that the demand for new associates is so low that law firms are essentially ignoring everyone who applies. Particularly since, when the economy rebounds, there would otherwise be a huge gap in staffing cases with associates of appropriate seniority level.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 09:15 PM
Good lord - are you people hysterial enough yet?? "2L's will NOT be fine! Nobody knows when -- if ever -- the economy will pick up again" LMAO - you really need to get a grip.
Posted by: anonymous | February 10, 2008 10:28 PM
with all this talk about the economic downturn and slow down in clerk hires does anyone know what the prospects for bankruptcy clerks will look like if in fact the economy tanks in 2008-09?
Posted by: mike | February 10, 2008 10:53 PM
I am a clerk at a State Supreme Court and the market for big firms in my area is very soft. My Judge's clerks from last year who are at big DC firms have reported that their firms are not hiring clerks at the moment.
Posted by: anon | February 10, 2008 11:03 PM
It's better than Texas, which is hell on earth.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 10, 2008 11:28 PM
Will law clerk hiring survive the Cloverfield monster?
Posted by: Anon | February 10, 2008 11:36 PM
With the increase in new associate salaries (at a faster clip than clerkship bonuses), the top candidates for the 2007-08 term were probably more likely to work at a firm than clerk for a judge.
Could it be, that in addition to the law firm economy, this term's clerks are having a tougher time finding work because they were not the top candidates pre-clerkship? Maybe clerks from prior terms had an easier time getting a post-clerkship job because those clerks were the best candidates pre-clerkship.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 02:13 AM
I know a couple of clerks who've had trouble finding a job this year. By "trouble", I mean that they sent their resumes out in a mass mailing and haven't heard anything back. I don't consider not turning anything up instantaneously using such a passive approach "trouble." It's idiocy to leave your fate in the hands of any firm's recruiting department - too much sloppiness, too much turnover, etc.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 07:30 AM
I recently interviewed for pre-clerkship summer gigs at NY firms, and so did a friend of mine. If they're hiring for pre-clerkship gigs (which are sort of a boondoggle), I have to assume hiring is not that tight.
Posted by: Pre-clerkship summer jobs | February 11, 2008 09:48 AM
I haven't had any trouble, but I've been using a head hunter. While I was initially hesitant about the idea, it seemed to make sense -- they know which firms are hiring and which are not so that you don't have to waste your time with a mass mailing. I've done 2 full round interviews and gotten 2 offers.
Posted by: current clerk | February 11, 2008 10:37 AM
10:37 - which market?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 10:42 AM
LA
Posted by: 10:37 | February 11, 2008 11:05 AM
How did you find a headhunter?
Posted by: anon | February 11, 2008 11:13 AM
lateral link. i swear i'm not a troll. i've also just been chatting with a couple headhunters referred by friends. i worked for a year before clerking, so I don't know if that makes a difference in terms of working with a head hunter. i know that some firms (e.g., latham) refuse to pay head hunter fees for clerks).
Posted by: 10:37 | February 11, 2008 11:16 AM
I worked for a V20 firm in DC before clerking on the COA. Still, the top firms in my secondary, target market have not yet responded to my resume. I've received some bites from T2 firms. There is a definite unease in the market place regarding the need to hire more associates, even clerks. And the clerkship bonuses make clerks even more expensive.
Posted by: COA Clerk | February 11, 2008 11:18 AM
2:13,
You are an idiot. Anyone who takes a "bigfirm" job over a good clerkship is shortsighted, and does not have good judgment.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 12:08 PM
The market for associates in DC is tough right now for laterals and clerks. You may have better luck in NY.
Posted by: anon | February 11, 2008 12:51 PM
Yep, 2:13 is definitely wrong.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 12:55 PM
Mass mailings are lame.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 02:21 PM
How else to do it?
Posted by: anon | February 11, 2008 02:32 PM
Well, on the one hand I'm glad other clerks are having a rough time because it means I'm not alone. On the other hand, I'm worried b/c I'm a T2 clerk looking out of district.... Maybe the public defender is hiring.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 04:55 PM
I imagine this also depends on the market. I bet that clerks looking for jobs in NYC are not going to have a problem, but smaller markets might be more difficult.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 11, 2008 10:46 PM
Im am also curious as to the job opportunities for Bankruptcy Clerks, especially the ones who are done in Late Summer 2009.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 12, 2008 01:09 AM
...same question here, from a bankruptcy clerk to-be, I was curious what impact this economy will have on job prospects, especially if it keeps heading south? If we're knee deep in a recession come 2009, what kind of turn out can I except from nyc biglaw (bankruptcy departments)? note: clerkship is out of state plus I have the stigma of a ny TTT, albeit in the top 5%... is big law even an option? are clerkship bonuses just a pie in the sky if your judge is art. I?? …should I just continue clerking my way to district court?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 12, 2008 02:35 AM
I don't get the anxiety among the bankruptcy clerks. As the economy goes down the tubes, bankruptcies go up. That means the demand for bankruptcy associates goes up too...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 12, 2008 02:24 PM
I dont think clerks are having a rough time. Many firms might decline to hire a clerk as a summer associate, but thats different than their unwillingness to provide permanent offers to former law clerks. Clerks are jamming.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 19, 2008 01:55 PM