What's Going on at Alabama Law?
Sweet home Alabama. It's the home of law schools that have given us great stories in the past.
A fairly recent story, involving a student at the University of Alabama School of Law who got into a silverware spat with his roommate, was on the lighter side. But our latest tale from UA is more serious -- especially in the wake of yesterday's tragic shootings at Northern Illinois University.
Read more, after the jump.
Yesterday afternoon, this email was sent out on behalf of Dean Ken Rendall:
From: Mary Spybey
Sent: Thu 2/14/2008 1:56 PM
To: [UA Law]
Subject: From: Ken RandallMany of you were aware of a situation today involving a first-year student, whom we have assisted. We also have addressed and resolved fully all other concerns connected to the situation. I appreciate the help of those involved. (Please forgive the uncommon lack of details in an email from me, but I know you appreciate the privacy aspects of the situation.)
This morning brought a new email from Dean Randall:
A few students have e-mailed me about the note I sent yesterday afternoon.Though federal privacy law restrains us from sharing certain details about the student who disrupted class yesterday, I will be happy to answer any questions that I can concerning any institutional concerns.
We took some precautionary steps yesterday in consultation with campus experts and our school has been and remains secure. Your well-being is my number one priority.
In order to make myself available to all students, I will have open office hours today for 3 hours from approximately 11:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m. You do not need an appointment to see me. You are also free to call me at my office [xxxx] or on my cell [xxxx].
Ken Randall
Dean
Clarification: The "office hours" email did in fact go out, but we're not sure how widely it was distributed. It may have been sent only to students who contacted the dean to inquire about the situation.
What exactly happened in that classroom is unclear. Here are some of the different accounts we've heard:
1.
It wasn't my section, but apparently some 1L had a nervous breakdown and started saying a bunch of really creepy/weird stuff in class. Apparently it was laced with school-shooting innuendo.
2.
From what I have heard so far a 1L made some comments in either his Property or Con Law classes this morning that made people extremely uncomfortable. The accounts I have heard so far claim that the Prof. teaching the class wrote "Happy Valentines Day" up on the board, a few minutes into class the 1L stood up and asked the Prof. to erase it because he had "a date on Saturday and it's making me nervous." Later in the class someone made up a hypo about Auburn University (the 1L's alma mater), the 1L stood up an allegedly said "I'm not like the guys at columbine or the guy at VA Tech, and you can search my backpack..." he then said something about how using Auburn in the hypo was upsetting him.The whole incident made several people (including the prof.) very nervous, the prof. ended class, and I guess someone came to talk to the 1L (one account I heard claims that the police were called, but I doubt it).
If it is really no big deal I don't understand why the dean sent the email out. It raises more questions than it answers and only serves to fuel the law school rumor mill.
3.
A guy in one of the classes was acting really strange this morning. He asked his property teacher to erase happy valentines day off the board, then he asked her to take Auburn out of a hypo. Then he asked if he could tell a poem or a joke which the teacher allowed. In his spiel, he was telling people not to think he was crazy like the student in Colorado or the guy from Nebraska or any of the crazy people that have done things in the past. Then he said you can search my locker, carrell, and backpack because I don't have anything. He made a few other references to past shootings like colombine and the mall shooting.The teacher said he could step outside if he wasn't feeling well and he just sat down. Then he jumped up and reached for his backpack and the guy next to him took his backpack and wouldn't let him get it.
People in the class said he was shaking and obviously upset about something.
4.
Yesterday, a first-year property professor apparently wished his students "Happy Valentine's Day" through a message written on his classroom's whiteboard. A student called on during the class stopped in mid-answer saying "that is so distracting" and not saying anything else. Said student then volunteered to answer another question later in the class, only to go on a long tirade all about school shootings, delivered while standing up. There may or may not have been crying involved. After class, the professor counseled the student to go home, relax, and try to just get whatever was in his system out of it.Several students in the class were immediately more concerned by these statements, however, due not only to the statements sheer oddity, but also the fact that the student had been seen continuously looking at Columbine and other school-shooting related websites for approximately the last two weeks during class. When contacted, the administration stood silent. Unsatisfied, the students then called the police, who went to the kid's house and performed a search.
Here the details become a little murky as we have no roommate or neighbors to confirm this with, but the word is that the kid was then arrested and taken to Bryce Hospital -- a local maximum security mental hospital -- for evaluation (where he remains). We do know for sure, however, that several areas of the school (specifically the library and clinical instruction areas) were cleared of faculty and students and bomb-sniffing dogs were brought in to sweep. Interviewers from the large regional firms were simply kept in their interview rooms unaware, however, and we have heard that they are now extremely pissed at the school. Students working in the areas swept were told explicitly not to talk to the media if contacted and that no mention of the dogs presence should be made to anyone.
Feel free to discuss (respectfully) in the comments, but please don't identify any individuals by name. Thanks.










Comments
wow. WOW!
Posted by: BC | February 15, 2008 03:10 PM
That is very scary - the kid's either planning something big or is having a breakdown of some kind.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:10 PM
um, way to follow instructions there, asshole.
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 03:12 PM
wow. WOW!
Posted by: BC | February 15, 2008 03:12 PM
How many comments until someone posts a play on the phrase "law school gunner"?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:17 PM
I think we're all missing the point. Since when is 11:15-1:15 three hours? I guess we know why he isn't dean of the business school.
Posted by: Anon | February 15, 2008 03:20 PM
5 apparently
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:22 PM
good job keeping students in the dark. If, god forbid, something was to happen, I hope everyone in administration loses their job.
Posted by: Mark Walburg | February 15, 2008 03:30 PM
No PC is acceptable in these cases. The Dean has to tell everyone exact facts and what was done. He also needs to identify the "student" so if anyone else has any info/experience with him they could step forward.
Posted by: safety first | February 15, 2008 03:35 PM
3:20: maybe when you have to start billing, you'll learn how to make 11:15 to 1:15 into 3 hours.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:37 PM
3:20: my first response, as well.
3:37: so clever
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:44 PM
This stuff is scary. This happened "in the morning," way before the NIU shooting. Who knows how many people are out there just waiting to go off like this.
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 03:47 PM
Follow up e-mail re: office hours sent 10 minutes after first e-mail:
Dean Randall’s open office hours today will run for three hours from 11:15 – 2:15 p.m.
(NOT 1:15 p.m.)
Thank you
Posted by: office hours | February 15, 2008 03:48 PM
3:35 - i'm sure you'd love the sordid details, but obviously the police are involved already. If the dean really did NEED to do any of those things, they would have told him and he would have done it already.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:49 PM
TTT and a nervous breakdown? Kid sounds well grounded to me. Realized his crappy prospects
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 03:49 PM
3:49 - grow up
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 04:00 PM
3:49 - give me a break.
Lat - disappointed that all of these "reports" are "he said"...none of the writers were actually there, apparently.
Probably should give the admin and school a break until all the facts are known.
Posted by: anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:04 PM
Something vaguely similar happened at Northeastern a few years back, with the similar result that the kid was evaluated at a local mental health facility. It's sad to see things like this happen.
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 04:19 PM
Something vaguely similar happened at Northeastern a few years back, with the similar result that the kid was evaluated at a local mental health facility. It's sad to see things like this happen. The administration didn't post anything about it in that case.
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 04:20 PM
I saw a girl have a breakdown at my law school right around exam time. She accussed some cafeteria worker of stealing from her. She started shouting obscentities at the workers, then ran weeping down the hall as people stood in shocked silence. It was like the eighth time this girl had an incident at the law school. She now works at a prestigious firm.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:22 PM
"Yesterday, a first-year property professor apparently wished his students 'Happy Valentine's Day' through a message written on his classroom's whiteboard."
Most human beings (i.e., non-Lawyers) would phrase this as: "Yesterday, a first-year property professor apparently wrote 'Happy Valentine's Day' on the classroom whiteboard."
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:28 PM
I heard from a friend at U.Tennessee law that something similar to this happened there a few weeks ago.
Posted by: 1L | February 15, 2008 04:30 PM
Well you know you have to be crazy to want to waste your time and money getting a degree from such a TTT
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:31 PM
I bet it was that Grammar chick. Not having the period probably drove her mad
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:34 PM
4:28 - is the doubt experienced by your "most people" whether the expression is truly on the board (the ink keeps fading in and out, for example), or whether the professor wrote it (notwithstanding that it was his classroom - at least for that time slot)? I think the original poster has done a little better job than you of describing the situation though, of course, language being what it is . . .
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 04:47 PM
4:22 tells the truth: this happened in Scott Commons at UVA. The girl tried to get her money back for an extra thing of blue cheese or some such. VERY bizzare.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 04:47 PM
I once heard of a study that showed that people enter law school with the same relative proportion of mental issues as the normal population, but graduates of law schools have higher incidence. I think we -- as a profession -- frankly, should seriously consider the level of competition rampant in law schools, the stress level that it creates, and the challenges many students face in dealing with it. Not commenting on this issue per se, but in general, law students need to learn to RELAX.
Posted by: Anon | February 15, 2008 04:58 PM
Wow, what a crazy story.
I mean, the property professor is apparently both male *and* female. I had no idea Alabama was so open-minded...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:03 PM
My favorite part is them clearing the library of everyone but the big firm recruiters...really, there's so many ways you could go with that...you could say they cleared the library of all humans/worthwhile beings or that they were trying to create opportunity for more placements...okay, yeah, the issue is serious, but this is ATL, there has to be humor in that somewhere.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:07 PM
I was sitting in the room... within 6 feet. It wasn't 'nothing'.
I think the half-truths are probably more harmful than the real truth. We don't know what has happened since.
Class began fairly normal. Class begins and the professor began her lecture. Some time into it, he raised his hand and made a very weird comment. it was completely unrelated to everything going on in class, and the timing and content was very strange. Someone before class had written a happy valentines day note up on the board. (student, not professor). He asked if she could erase it off the board, and then started explaining that it was distracting, something about a date Saturday night, and how he couldn't do any of his reading this week because of that holiday. She asked if he was serious, and in a voice that sounded very joking, he said that no, he was only kidding. A little while later, maybe 15-20 minutes, he again raises his hand. We were looking at hypotheticals on a slide, and one involved both the University and Auburn. Again the timing and connotation of these comments were very weird and completely out of context. He asked her if she had written these herself or if she had gotten them out of the book. Again he looked very agitated. She said she had written them. He then asked her to change the slide up on the board, because Auburn up on the screen bothered him. He said something about how he has siblings that go there, and how it was very distracting to him. She seemed to notice something was wrong at this point, and just disarmed the situation by saying sure and changing the slide in the PowerPoint presentation.
After a while he began typing something on his laptop in Microsoft Word. He had been taking notes there, but what he was typing was different. I also heard afterward from someone sitting near him that he had been googling things on his laptop too (i.e. school shootings, OKC bombing). He raised his hand for the last time about 15-20 min before the end of class. At first he said he had a joke to tell, then an apology. He began reading it aloud. At first he said something along the lines of, I'm not like Nebraska or Colorado, and I'm not like Andrea Yates or Charles Murray or any of those other defendants we learned about in Criminal Law.. If you want to go through my bag, or my car, or my apartment, you are more than welcome to. and then some sort of apology about how he was sorry.
I think I was one of the few people that it clicked with that Nebraska and Colorado were references to school shootings. sometime during his talking, the professor asked him if this was the joke. He replied with something like 'yes, I just need to read all of it'. After he got finished, he was very visibly upset. He was shaking, his eyes had welled up and he was crying a bit. He was very twitchy and jumpy. He turned his chair and reached at the top of a black bag, and grabbed it by the top. He did not try to reach inside. Almost immediately, he put the bag back down, and then turned his chair face forward again. He reached for his keys, and his shaking intensified. He looked like he was on the brink of breaking down. With keys in hand, he got up and tried to leave. He did not pack up his things. He said 'excuse me' to the person next to him, and the guy began moving his chair up and out of the way very slowly. He suddenly seemed to change his mind and turned and sat back down. At that point he began using his laptop mousepad to highlight the text of what he was said in class, and made the font very large, so it took up the whole screen. After class I think the Prof kept him in there to talk to him.
To me it felt like he was trying to make amends, or apologizing for something he was about to do.. The room was very tense and very strange.. and I don't know how many people picked up on all the things that happened.. but it felt very intense sitting that close to him.
People that claim it's nothing are either stupid or naive. Saying you know him well enough to know he wouldn't do anything is the most invalid argument ever. The guy's parents from the NIU shooting also didn't think their kid was capable.
and please stop posting rumors and false truths. it wont assist in any way getting the kid the help he neds.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:12 PM
"4:28 - is the doubt experienced by your "most people" whether the expression is truly on the board (the ink keeps fading in and out, for example), or whether the professor wrote it (notwithstanding that it was his classroom - at least for that time slot)? I think the original poster has done a little better job than you of describing the situation though, of course, language being what it is . . . "
4:47, you must be the same illiterate who wrote "Said student then volunteered to answer another question later in the class, only to go on a long tirade all about school shootings, delivered while standing up. There may or may not have been crying involved. ... Several students in the class were immediately more concerned by these statements, ..."
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:18 PM
The incredible thing was that the professor tried to disarm the situation and release class. Yet some girl, who was too dumb to realize what was going on, continued to ask dumb question about future interests. Even though the prof. kept saying "we will go over that on mOnday."
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:20 PM
5:20, sounds like a case professional courtesy: just one gunner enabling another.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:25 PM
Ironic that she was curious about future interests while possibly on the verge of relinquishing all of her present interests.
Posted by: What a Dumas. | February 15, 2008 05:26 PM
"In order to make myself available to all students, I will have open office hours today for 3 hours from approximately 11:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m."
That Dean can't count. Sheez.
Posted by: math major | February 15, 2008 05:27 PM
@5:20
2 words:
Bottom. Quarter.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:42 PM
Ok, some of the "accounts" are just ridiculous. I pretty much second everything 5:12 says. The guy was seen looking at some school shooting articles just in that class and not the past few weeks. Students did not call the police. The administration brought in the police to err on the side of caution. The library was NOT cleared. I went to the library right after that class and stayed for a few hours. Some of the rooms were searched just in case. This was a serious situation and I think that the administration handled it the best that they could with the information that they had.
Please don't tell "your side" of the story if you weren't even there and just want to share a rumor that you heard from your friend who heard it from someone who heard it from someone that may have been there.
My prayers are with this guy because he's normally an easy-going, nice guy. I would have picked several other classmates to do this sort of thing before him.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:47 PM
4:58: i cannot agree more. i'm a generally calm and in control person, but i definitely lose sleep over law school finals. it just feels like there's so much at stake if you don't do well.
how do you get somebody to actually relax if it's clear that unless they shine they will not get a good job? law school is inherently stressful as hell, and it doesn't seem like there is any way to make it less competitive. employers only want to hire students at the top of the class because clients only want to be represented by the best and the brightest. but not everyone can be the best and brightest, and there you have the essence of why law school is what law school is.
the only alternative is to convince law students that biglaw is not all its cracked up to be, and the biglaw salary is what it is because the hours are insane... as one lawyer-friend of mine put it, "you earn every penny." but on the ground you're hard pressed to convince aspiring lawyers that they should work for small firms and make very little money. there is no glamor in that...
as far as what happened in alabama: i'm surprised that a kid would have a break down this early in the semester. if law school is going to break you, you would at least think it would happen closer to finals.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 05:59 PM
"In order to make myself available to all students, I will have open office hours today for 3 hours from approximately 11:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m."
On the first day of legal writing my 1L year, we learned to never say "In order to" Just say "To..."
Elementary, my friend.
Posted by: anon | February 15, 2008 06:05 PM
for what it's worth: at least one reader on this board finds it highly juvenile of posters to make light of this very serious situation. everyone makes silly errors in emails... i'm horrified to think that something like this could happen at my school.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 06:09 PM
Lat,
I hope you can confirm the office hours email from the Dean. I never received this email, nor did anyone else in the Property Class where the incident happened. The first email went to the entire school. There is a good chance that the office hours email is a fake. If it did not come from a law.ua.edu email address then it is fake.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 06:17 PM
So this all happened before the Illinois shooting? Think the guy knew the Illinois guy and had been told something was about to happen?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 06:21 PM
5:59, you're pathetic:
"i definitely lose sleep over law school finals. it just feels like there's so much at stake if you don't do well."
Uh, you should. Because there is, and rightfully so. Which leads into your next weepy little point:
"how do you get somebody to actually relax if it's clear that unless they shine they will not get a good job"
Who said anything about relaxing your way through life. Of course you're not going to get anything handed to you if you suck at what you're being hired to do.
"employers only want to hire students at the top of the class because clients only want to be represented by the best and the brightest."
Can you blame them?
"but not everyone can be the best and brightest"
If they're not, that's nobody's fault and nobody's problem but their own. Are they entitled to some sort of rarified, exciting, well-compensated, fufilling existance? No.
"as one lawyer-friend of mine put it, 'you earn every penny.'"
Uh, that's how it works with money, yes.
"you're hard pressed to convince aspiring lawyers that they should work for small firms and make very little money. there is no glamor in that..."
Sure. The problem is there's very little money in that. We could give a fuck about "glamor."
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 06:31 PM
1. Practicing law is stressful. If you cannot handle stress, it's the wrong career for you. Making law school less stressful doesn't solve he problem. It just delays the time when you find out you weren't cut out for that career.
2. Many areas of law involve "very serious situation[s]" -- say, wrongful death, child custody, criminal law, etc. You have to be able to remove yourself from the "serious situation" and be able to evaluate the legal and factual issues dispassionately. Paying attention to the precise wording of a statement or statute, for example, is not trivial or making light of the underlying factual situation, it is practicing law.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 06:33 PM
6:31: name calling will get you far in life. i'm not pathetic. i was simply agreeing with somebody else that law school is very stressful and makes some people crack.
you clearly missed the point of what i was saying. clients should not have lower expectations of their lawyers, and good firms should not hire students that did poorly in law school.
i was making an objective observation about why law school is inherently competitive. the point was not that firms should hire underqualified candidates, rather it was that many law students would benefit from lowering their expectations and not being devestated by ending up at a smaller firm that pays less than biglaw.
and it is more about the glamor than you care to admit. laywers at smaller firms start at around 50k and will be making 6 figures (or slightly under) within 7 or 8 years of working. that is more than enough to live a very fulfilling life and comfortably support a family. indeed, my parents put me and my brother through college and grad school on a similar combined salary.
however, for some reason law school culture views this outcome as a failure. how can i start at 50k? our perspectives are fundamentally skewed...
and no, i'm not a TTT student trying to justify my own outcome. i turned down a plush job making 80k at a smaller firm in a secondary market (with almost a guarantee of making partner) in favor of a large firm job in NY that pays 160. will i be happier there? no. i'm sure of it. will i make partner there? probably not. but that's where the glory was. law school culture would not have allowed me to take the other option, even though that's probably where i would be happier in the long run.
inherent stress aside, law school is set up in a way that makes it more stressful than it needs to be. why would you make the first year so much harder than second and third year. in college you start with 100 level classes and end up at 400 level classes by the time you're a senior and know what yoiu're doing. law school is quite the opposite. this is why many students have such a hard time first year. they are not less capable than their peers. indeed, they end up doing better than their peers in the long run, but they do worse at the beginning because they didn't catch the elusive magic formula that it requires to do well as a first semester 1L. people come to law school having no clue what they're doing, and they face the hardest semester of their three years. it doesn't allow for a learning curve.
my point is that, yes, law school is inherently stressful, but some of the stresses of law school are chosen by us as law students and by the requirements of the law school system. law school is more stressful than it needs to be.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 07:17 PM
just to point out - Clinic area wasn't cleared either
Posted by: alalaw -anon | February 15, 2008 07:53 PM
7:17, the reason 1L year is harder than the others isn't because the material is harder. It's because 1Ls are idiots.
I could easily see someone saying that they thought freshman year of college was the hardest (in fact, I'm pretty sure I *have* heard people say this). Likewise, many people say the first year at a law firm is the hardest. It isn't because it's objectively the hardest; it's because virtually everybody sucks at something when they're doing it for the first time. After you get over the learning curve you can handle much more difficult stuff with greater ease.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 08:11 PM
"will i be happier there? no. i'm sure of it. will i make partner there? probably not. but that's where the glory was. law school culture would not have allowed me to take the other option, even though that's probably where i would be happier in the long run"
That's a very sad comment. You took a job where you know you will be less happy than elsewhere? And this b/c law school culture ostensibly did not allow you to take the option that was the better one for you? You have bigger problems than "law school culture." One day you're going to have to figure your life out for yourself b/c you are responsible for your own life and happiness. In the meantime, I suppose you'll just have be miserable. . . with no one to blame but yourself.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 08:40 PM
and it is more about the glamor than you care to admit. laywers at smaller firms start at around 50k and will be making 6 figures (or slightly under) within 7 or 8 years of working. that is more than enough to live a very fulfilling life and comfortably support a family. indeed, my parents put me and my brother through college and grad school on a similar combined salary.
Has it occured to you, 7:17, that we'd rather make 190k to start, work hard at a job that inherntly requires a lot of compromises in our personal lives to do well while younger, and leave after five, maybe eight, years? By which time we're making lot more than 190k, enabling us to have some investments, that let us take a more relaxing job as we hit our mid to late 30's and have a supplemental income stream? That some of us have no interest in working as a fucking lawyer for the rest of our lives?
Posted by: 6:31 | February 15, 2008 09:16 PM
"law school culture would not have allowed me to take the other option"
If 'culture' influenced you, and not debt or desire for more money, you're an irrational moron.
"it doesn't allow for a learning curve"
Guess what: neither to most large law firms.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 09:27 PM
1L year is only harder if you didn't do well enough to make law review or qualify for any of the activities to make second year three times the work.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 15, 2008 09:36 PM
9:27,
Law firms don't allow for a learning curve? First years come in expected to, say, negotiate claw-back rights or tipping baskets, or to know what they are?
Posted by: You are retarded | February 15, 2008 11:25 PM
7:17 - "culture", really? if you know you'd be unhappy at a biglaw job but you can't stay true to yourself because of peer pressure, i have a hard time imagining you as an effective advocate. don't blame the "culture"--just own up to the fact that you want to make a shit ton of money right away or you're insecure enough to need validation from biglaw to be happy.
Posted by: chareth | February 16, 2008 01:17 AM
To imitate a great mathematician
$70k + NO billable hours = Loving Life
That is all!
Posted by: Anon | February 16, 2008 01:22 AM
Law schools only have oppressive cometition whenits not a top 10 law school.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 16, 2008 02:10 AM
Mark wrote..."I hope everyone in administration loses their job."
His job. Her job. Or, his or her job. Everyone is singular.
And federal law prohibits the school from releasing much in the way of information. You may disagree with that (as do I), but that's the law.
Posted by: Grammar Police | February 16, 2008 11:54 AM
first of all it is truly pathetic for people to use something like this as a chance to take pot shots at how good the law school is. Ignorant people making derogatory marks like this about a school they have never visited and know nothing about is bad enough, but after a potentially tragic event like this shows how worthless some people really are.
secondly almost the entire third paragraph of note 4 is completely BS. Students did not call the police, and we were definitely NEVER told not to tell the media or to keep it a secret in any way. I do not know how things like this get started, but to go a step further and post garbage like that without checking the facts is irresponsible and despicable. What happened to the student is not known either.
Posted by: UA student | February 16, 2008 05:35 PM
first of all it is truly pathetic for people to use something like this as a chance to take pot shots at how good the law school is. Ignorant people making derogatory marks like this about a school they have never visited and know nothing about is bad enough, but after a potentially tragic event like this shows how worthless some people really are.
secondly almost the entire third paragraph of note 4 is completely BS. Students did not call the police, and we were definitely NEVER told not to tell the media or to keep it a secret in any way. I do not know how things like this get started, but to go a step further and post garbage like that without checking the facts is irresponsible and despicable. What happened to the student is not known either.
Posted by: UA student | February 16, 2008 05:36 PM
Bryce is not maximum security. Bryce doesn't even have a gate. The maximum security facility in Tuscaloosa is Taylor Harden.
Posted by: UA Grad | February 17, 2008 02:05 PM
This stuff doesn't happen at top 10 schools.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 17, 2008 02:53 PM
Lat, stop posting about TTT law schools.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 17, 2008 06:05 PM
Obviously, the student suffers from an anxiety disorder. Symptoms of such disorders include thinking thoughts about topics that disgust/repulse you (such as, "I hope I don't fall on the ice and break my leg") over and over. Many of those experiencing this may wish to purge themselves of these thoughts, as it is disturbing to think this way.
I am truly surprised that members of a profession with so much stress/anxiety can't understand that this is a mental health issue, and that IT CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE. If you think it can't happen to you (b/c you went to a top school or b/c you never had an issue like that before) THINK AGAIN.
Have a heart Above the Law readers.
I would encourage you all to find out about the symptoms of stress-related mental health disorders so that you can respond with resources and understanding if someone you know experiences a problem like this. Judging others doesn't make you better than them - it makes you worse.
Posted by: Anon | February 17, 2008 11:01 PM
11:01, Just because the guy was out of paxil, doesn't mean he "shouldn't have better known better." Anxiety sucks, but you can still get your shit together without scaring the Duke of Norfolk's ghost out of everyone...
Posted by: Anonymous | February 17, 2008 11:51 PM
guys in my high school class would ask the teacher to erase happy valentine's day from the whiteboard and then make freaky incoherent comments all the time. It was no big deal.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 18, 2008 10:50 AM
11:51pm, I am shocked and appalled by your response here. If it is correct, why not use your real name? I think we all know why you posted anonymously - you are being ignorant and crude. A sad commentary on the legal profession!
Posted by: Improvilaw | February 18, 2008 11:18 AM
11:18, you sure get shocked easily. I had to scroll up to make sure you weren't talking about a different 11:51. And what part of his response do you refer to when you say "If it is correct?" The part where he says anxiety sucks? The part where he says even the anxious can get their shit together? You're just...retarded is all. And why would anyone put their real name on here.
You contribute nothing to life! :(
Posted by: Not 11:51 | February 18, 2008 11:32 AM
It always amuses me that people think during a tragedy is no time to make jokes. Certainly, a guy going nuts in law school is sad, but enforced solemnity will not make it any less so.
Posted by: TT | February 18, 2008 12:46 PM
I'd simply like to point out that UA is not a TTT as it has been in the top 50 law schools in the nation for several years now. In fact, I believe the most recent ranking was 36th. Last year's class had a 100% bar passage rate on the AL bar. Thanks.
Posted by: UA graduate | February 18, 2008 02:39 PM
Excuse me, Mr. "you contribute nothing to life." It is that kind of immaturity that makes me sick. The poster suggested that someone suffering from a mental disorder should just "get his act together" That is a ridiculous statement.
Posted by: Anon | February 18, 2008 05:34 PM
TTT? Anyone who refers to UA Law as a TTT has never looked at US News & World Reports and is most likely a homosexual. Have a great day!
Posted by: Anonymous | February 19, 2008 12:16 AM
Has nobody mentioned that he had stopped taking his prescription medications earlier in the week? On the medications, he had never raised any problems that his classmates are aware of.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 19, 2008 12:28 AM
US News and World Reports is BS, but bashing the public schools in general just makes you look like a cock and/or a spoiled trust funder.
Most kids at Alabama just want to be lawyers. Most don't think about jobs in New York. And they won't kill themselves billing 2100 and actually working god-knows-what either at some bastard firm that only hires T5 students, and find out a year or so in that they make less in real money than some guy working for a "no-name" firm in Memphis.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 19, 2008 07:42 AM
What is a TTT?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 21, 2008 01:53 PM
omg, alabama is terrible. i can't believe anyone would attend this ttt. I am impressed at the number of ridiculous attempts by students to legitimize their attendance there.
Posted by: hizzla | February 22, 2008 06:11 PM
I was 4 feet from this guy in class! I wanted to git my gun from the rack of my truck jest to be safe, but I left it at my hunting camp. This guy usually seems normal so I don't know what was going on their.
Also, UA is not a ttt! Anyone who thinks a top 50 school is a ttt is a idiot!
Posted by: anon | February 22, 2008 06:16 PM
Ummm, 12:16, really?
" Anyone who refers to UA Law as a TTT has never looked at US News & World Reports and is most likely a homosexual."
What a strange analogy. How does not news magazine or referring to UA as TTT relate to sexual orientation? Seriously, the third grade called, they want their immature gay joke back.
Posted by: anon | February 27, 2008 03:48 PM
Ummm, 12:16, really?
" Anyone who refers to UA Law as a TTT has never looked at US News & World Reports and is most likely a homosexual."
What a strange analogy. How does not reading a news magazine or referring to UA as TTT relate to sexual orientation? Seriously, the third grade called, they want their immature gay joke back.
Posted by: anon | February 27, 2008 03:52 PM