Featured Job Survey: Hiring Clerks?
There have been some rumblings on this blog of a slowdown in judicial clerk hiring, even as firms raise clerkship bonuses to $50K.
Today's ATL / Lateral Link survey digs a little deeper into who is (or isn't) hiring judicial clerks, and what their bonuses look like.













Comments
Twice in a row? Slap me silly and call it Christmas.
Posted by: Firsty McFirsterson | February 26, 2008 11:44 AM
Can an associate practicing 5+ years in a big law corporate group make a change in career direction and get a judicial clerkship. Possible? Ideas to get it done? Thanks.
Posted by: related inquiry | February 26, 2008 12:02 PM
Anything is possible. But clerkships tend to concentrate on litigation. A bankruptcy clerkship might be beneficial.
Regardless, apply and see what happens. Be prepared to field questions as to why you seek a change at this stage in your career, particularly if partnership track is along the not-too-distant horizon.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 12:10 PM
That's actually a very good way to use a clerkship. It can be like B-school -- you go into it because you want to change direction afterward.
Not every judge will look at you, but many will. The growing trend is to hire clerks who have been practicing for a while.
I would ask around among lawyers and law clerks in the district you want to clerk in to find out which judges have a pattern of hiring people a few years out.
Caution: Obviously you will take a massive pay cut! Way bigger than the Obama Pay Cut.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 12:11 PM
I definitely think this is a developing problem. I'm a clerk in who just went through the job hunting process in Boston. It was tough. I ended up with offers from the top three firms in the city, but it took some work to get my foot in the door and I definitely got the sense the firms weren't looking to hire unless the candidate had an in of some sort/someone to vouch for him.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 12:51 PM
12:51
When you say work, what do you mean? What did you do above and beyond the traditional cover letter and resume mailing?
Im a soon to be clerk, and am starting to think about these things and how I need to approach the job search as a clerk.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:02 PM
I think it may be tough, 12:02. You'll probably get some judge to bite, but I think the "trend" to hire individuals with some working experience is more in the line of 1-2 years, not 5. Best of luck, though!
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:05 PM
This survey is pointless if it doesn't account for whether firms are hiring non-clerks. I mean, Thacher Profit sure as hell isn't hiring clerks, but that doesn't mean it's bad to be a clerk right now.
All else being equal, your job prospects are better as a clerk than as a non-clerk.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:14 PM
Anyone know of EDNY/SDNY judges who prefer to hire folks with 1-2 years of experience?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:20 PM
In one respect, being a non-clerk is better - a non-clerk's current job doesn't have an end date. Mine does.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:23 PM
I concur with 12:51. I'm a COA clerk with great grades from a top school, applying in a secondary market similar to Boston. So far, I've targeted the few V50 firms with offices here, and my mailings have been essentially fruitless. I will, of course, apply more broadly, but I get the feeling that things are difficult this year.
@1:14 - But clerks are the ones going through the process right now. Right now, things aren't bad for students, because they've already made their plans.
Posted by: Clerk | February 26, 2008 01:30 PM
I worked for 4 years in a biglaw corporate group before clerking on the COA. My judge appreciates my work experience and doesn't mind that it focused on transactions. The more difficult part is finding a job after clerking. Firms are confused by my clerking, and I always get the question whether I want to be a litigator. I would advise knowing where you want to go after the clerkship, before accepting one.
Posted by: Mid Level Clerk | February 26, 2008 01:36 PM
1:30: By "fruitless" do you mean that firms are ignoring your applications? Or are they outright rejecting you? I've had difficulty in big markets, too.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:47 PM
I'm another COA clerk having trouble finding a job. I worked for a firm for a year before clerking. Went to a good law school, got good grades, etc. Any clerk can get a job somewhere like NY, especially if you don't have a practice group preference. But getting a job elsewhere (especially if you do have a practice group preference) is harder. My sense is also that I'm viewed as a lateral, not a typical clerk because of my experience. Because of that, firms will only hire me if they specifically need a lateral, as opposed to firms who will just hire a lot of clerks and consider them part of their large, first year batch.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 01:59 PM
Ditto to 1:59. I am also being viewed more as a lateral than a law clerk because of my prior work experience. I am wondering whether that view will be reflected in the clerkship bonus I receive upon accepting a job. In my secondary market, $50,000 is not standard and firms award varying bonuses. I haven't talked compensation with any firms yet, but I am going to fight tooth and nail for a full clerkship bonus.
Posted by: COA Clerk | February 26, 2008 02:05 PM
1:47 - Ignoring. No rejections yet. One screening interview, at which the partner said I'd be an excellent fit etc., but they haven't decided whether they will hire this year.
Posted by: Clerk | February 26, 2008 02:07 PM
I hear that the job market in Dublin, Ohio is great!
Posted by: Adam Kirgis | February 26, 2008 02:19 PM
No, seriously! The COL is low but the QOL is super high!
GO BUCKEYES
Posted by: Adam Kirgis | February 26, 2008 02:21 PM
i had an interview 2 weeks ago. how long before i just assume the polite letter is in the mail?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 03:23 PM
Atlanta raising to $35k clerkship bonus.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 03:29 PM
Does anybody think Bankruptcy Clerks done with their clerkship in 2009 are going to have a difficult time finding employment?
Or in the onslaught of the seemingly probably recession will bankruptcy clerks be in high demand?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 03:40 PM
It's murder out there. I have excellent grades, decent law school, a year of prior firm experience, but no one is biting.
All this rejection is starting to remind me of high school.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 05:10 PM
I got a job back in november.
Posted by: aheadofthecurve | February 26, 2008 06:05 PM
Anyone have Philly-specific information? And does anyone know what standard clerkship bonuses look like in Philly? I know that the big two there pay $50K for federal, but I assume they are way the heck out in front.
Posted by: Anonymous | February 26, 2008 06:19 PM
why doesn't Lat just go and blow Lateral Link - can he feature them anymore on ATL???
Posted by: Anon | February 26, 2008 06:38 PM
I was just starting to lose hope when, this past week, I received several invitations for interviews. I don't know what the time-line is normally like, but maybe things are just picking up now.
Posted by: mag clerk | February 27, 2008 02:20 PM
Does anyone have an educated guess on when the clerkship hiring season slows down/ends in LA (based on past clerkship recruiting)?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 29, 2008 11:29 AM
mag clerk, are you looking in NY?
Posted by: Anonymous | March 1, 2008 01:13 PM
mag clerk, are you looking in NY?
Posted by: Anonymous | March 1, 2008 01:14 PM