Justice Scalia's Pro-Defendant Tilt?
(At least if DUI's involved; death penalty not included.)
Justice Antonin Scalia is often wrongly viewed as being a knee-jerk conservative. If you survey his entire jurisprudence, you'll notice many cases in which he sided with the criminal defendant over law enforcement. His view of the Sixth Amendment, as articulated in the line of sentencing cases starting with Apprendi and moving forward, is generally pro-defendant.
And just the other day, in Begay v. United States (PDF), Justice Scalia once again sided with the criminal. Why? An observant ATL reader offers this speculation:
In Begay v. U.S., the Court decided drunk driving was not a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act. Nino concurred, saying the following: "because I cannot say that drunk driving clearly poses [a serious risk of injury to another], the rule of lenity brings me to concur in the judgment of the Court."Weird for two reasons. First, does Nino really think a DUI is not dangerous? And second, how often do we hear Nino invoke the rule of lenity?
But maybe not so weird after all. Recall Nino's daughter, Ann Banaszewski, getting busted for DUI, which was all the more shocking because she had her kids in the car. Hmm.
In other recent Nino news, a different reader reports:
Did you read Scalia's concurrence in Baze v. Rees? He pretty much gave Stevens a rhetorical beatdown; guess Nino won't be getting an invite to Stevens' birthday party this weekend....
Here's one part we especially liked (citations omitted):
The experience of the state legislatures and the Congress—who retain the death penalty as a form of punishment—is dismissed as “the product of habit and inattention rather than an acceptable deliberative process.” The experience of social scientists whose studies indicate that the death penalty deters crime is relegated to a footnote. The experience of fellow citizens who support the death penalty is described, with only the most thinly veiled condemnation, as stemming from a “thirst for vengeance.” It is Justice Stevens’ experience that reigns over all.
Or maybe Justice Kennedy's. Ain't judicial review grand?
(That's just one excerpt; the opinion as a whole is quite the benchslap. Check it out in full over here.)
Court: Drunk driving not a violent felony [SCOTUSblog]
Begay v. United States [SCOTUSblog (PDF)]

Her high-profile father continues to


